frame
Howdy Debater!
Sign In Register


Best Funny Content

  • We live on a flat plane

    Coveny said:

    Mhm, well, atleast you're admitting it now, after trying to deny it... again...

    "Also you have no grasp of what advertising is. You are selling the flat earth model and you want people to buy into it. You are doing so by "spreading the word" just like every other theist who believes this crap. (and no I didn't call you a theist, I said you were like a theist... I clarify this because I KNOW you will misrepresent me on this)"

    So after directly calling me a theist (which is unrelated to the topic we're discussing, aka the flat Earth), you're now saying you said I was "like a theist" Ahem... and by the way, could you also explain witch burnings which you also think is relevant to the flat Earth?

    So you're going to compare debating the flat Earth to buying and selling and advertising? Yep... troll.
    Didn't deny it.

    Didn't "directly" call you a theist.

    Theist is the bases of flat earth, so it is related.

    You are like a theist.

    Witch burning is an example (like flat earth) of theist passing off the bible as "facts"

    And rather than addressing the debate you revert back to insults/name calling again. Your next move is "I already addressed that", "I totally won", and "whatever you accuse me of doing... YOU DO THAT!"
    Sorry to remind you but we can actually look back and see what you said. Also, if calling you a troll is "dehumanization" then which bridge do you live under because it is so damn obvious you're just a bad troll at this point.
    namemcnameCoveny
  • We live on a flat plane

    subdeo said:
    Not only do NASA pictures show us that the earth is an oblate spheroid, we can see that the earth is not flat because any layman can go outside and see the International Space Station passing over their location. On many occasions, it can be seen to pass over twice in 92 minutes (The ISS's orbital period). If the earth was flat, the ISS would not return back around the other side of the earth.
    It is likely the ISS is simply a U2 Plane. Even then it is possible at certain angles to see the Earth as flat in the livestream and NASA has admitted on multiple occassions their images of the Earth are fake
    namemcnameCoveny
  • We live on a flat plane

    Not only do NASA pictures show us that the earth is an oblate spheroid, we can see that the earth is not flat because any layman can go outside and see the International Space Station passing over their location. On many occasions, it can be seen to pass over twice in 92 minutes (The ISS's orbital period). If the earth was flat, the ISS would not return back around the other side of the earth.
    CovenySilverishGoldNova
  • We live on a flat plane

    @Coveny which bridge do you live under, since apparently calling you a troll is dehumanization fallacy?
    You tried to dehumanize me. Why are you still digging, still insulting me, and still NOT debating me. I think we both know that's because your position is weak so you would rather draw me into an insult war where you can justify deleting everything. 
    ErfisflatSilverishGoldNovanamemcname
  • We live on a flat plane

    @Coveny which bridge do you live under, since apparently calling you a troll is dehumanization fallacy?
    Erfisflatnamemcname
  • We live on a flat plane

    Coveny said:
    Coveny said:
    Coveny said:
    Coveny said:
    @SilverishGoldNova it's not a refute because you don't "accept" pictures as proof. So it's just an insult... so ya it's spam. 
    thats actually sorta funny but I must ask, how do you define "spam"? I
    I'll go with Oxford's definition "Irrelevant or unsolicited messages sent over the Internet, typically to a large number of users, for the purposes of advertising, phishing, spreading malware, etc".

    Since when is an argument you don't understand malware?
     
    I have no problem understanding your argument, but even if I did that's not a requirement of:

    Irrelevant messages sent over the internet to a large number of users for the purposes of advertising your beliefs.

    I get you have trouble understanding things, so you change others positions to make it something you can easily argue against and "defeat", but don't think I'm not going to call you out on that BS.
    So now creating an argument and a debate for a flat Earth is advertising? Everyone, This Fine Gentleman Who Needs To Step Up His Arguments has just discreetly called me stupid after calling debate "advertising" *cue audience laughter*
    Didn't call you stupid, said you have trouble understanding things. Yet another strawman/misquote. 

    But I have called you stupid in the past, as a for the record thing, so you should know that if I feel like using the term toward you I'll neither imply or be "discreet" about it.

    Also you have no grasp of what advertising is. You are selling the flat earth model and you want people to buy into it. You are doing so by "spreading the word" just like every other theist who believes this crap. (and no I didn't call you a theist, I said you were like a theist... I clarify this because I KNOW you will misrepresent me on this)

    Mhm, well, atleast you're admitting it now, after trying to deny it... again...

    "Also you have no grasp of what advertising is. You are selling the flat earth model and you want people to buy into it. You are doing so by "spreading the word" just like every other theist who believes this crap. (and no I didn't call you a theist, I said you were like a theist... I clarify this because I KNOW you will misrepresent me on this)"

    So after directly calling me a theist (which is unrelated to the topic we're discussing, aka the flat Earth), you're now saying you said I was "like a theist" Ahem... and by the way, could you also explain witch burnings which you also think is relevant to the flat Earth?

    So you're going to compare debating the flat Earth to buying and selling and advertising? Yep... troll.



    Erfisflatnamemcname
  • We live on a flat plane

    Coveny said:
    Coveny said:
    My question is why an $18 BN a year company that allegedly has brought humanity beyond the solar system must now.... take scans of the Earth and put them in photoshop.
    "Now you misdirect rather than addressing or admitting to the fallacy you presented"
    Point stands unrefuted, answer my question instead of just dismissing it a fallacy
    "Correct MY point stand unrefuted, and rather than address it you have moved off in another direction."
    Could you just answer it, and stop with your deflection/reflection fallacy?

    Dawn was originally implying that Erfisflat said people were stupid if they "believed" in black holes (as his rebuttal to Rahu), so if anyone is using a strawman its him.
    "Now you move the goal posts. It's not that Dawn said it, it's that he "implied" it."
    You know with you, I have noticed the tiniest of things must be dissected for you and that 1 word can completely redirect the conversation.
    "Nothing added to the debate from insults, MY point stands.."
    So, is it a strawman or insults we're talking about? Gish gallop fallacy.

    dehumanization. "dehumanization"
    "Point stands unrefuted"
    Explain how me calling you a troll is dehumanization.
    "As you are confused about this and don't understand. Trolls are not humans."
    I didn't know you lived under a bridge. Which one? Ya know maybe I was exaggerating *before* when I said you admitted to being a troll, but now you're making it just so damn obvious. 

    Ya know, after the posts containing those quotes were deleted or I deleted most of your insults in the other thread you are now denying it ever happened.
    "I have not and did not deny insulting you, you are strawman'ing my position ... again" 
    You did and now you're just calling it a fallacy if I bring it up
    "I did not call it a fallacy for "bringing it up". You aren't addressing my point, or MY position. Point stands unrefuted"
    I've brought it up multiple times and each time its just "fulluci"



    namemcname
  • We live on a flat plane

    Coveny said:
    My question is why an $18 BN a year company that allegedly has brought humanity beyond the solar system must now.... take scans of the Earth and put them in photoshop.
    "Now you misdirect rather than addressing or admitting to the fallacy you presented"
    Point stands unrefuted, answer my question instead of just dismissing it a fallacy
    Correct MY point stand unrefuted, and rather than address it you have moved off in another direction.

    Dawn was originally implying that Erfisflat said people were stupid if they "believed" in black holes (as his rebuttal to Rahu), so if anyone is using a strawman its him.
    Now you move the goal posts. It's not that Dawn said it, it's that he "implied" it.
    You know with you, I have noticed the tiniest of things must be dissected for you and that 1 word can completely redirect the conversation.
    Nothing added to the debate from insults, MY point stands..

    dehumanization. "dehumanization"
    Point stands unrefuted
    Explain how me calling you a troll is dehumanization.
    As you are confused about this and don't understand. Trolls are not humans.

    Ya know, after the posts containing those quotes were deleted or I deleted most of your insults in the other thread you are now denying it ever happened.
    I have not and did not deny insulting you, you are strawman'ing my position ... again 
    You did and now you're just calling it a fallacy if I bring it up
    I did not call it a fallacy for "bringing it up". You aren't addressing my point, or MY position. Point stands unrefuted


    SilverishGoldNovanamemcname
  • We live on a flat plane

    Coveny said:
    My question is why an $18 BN a year company that allegedly has brought humanity beyond the solar system must now.... take scans of the Earth and put them in photoshop.
    "Now you misdirect rather than addressing or admitting to the fallacy you presented"
    Point stands unrefuted, answer my question instead of just dismissing it a fallacy

    Dawn was originally implying that Erfisflat said people were stupid if they "believed" in black holes (as his rebuttal to Rahu), so if anyone is using a strawman its him.
    "Now you move the goal posts. It's not that Dawn said it, it's that he "implied" it."
    You know with you, I have noticed the tiniest of things must be dissected for you and that 1 word can completely redirect the conversation.

    dehumanization. "dehumanization"
    "Point stands unrefuted"
    Explain how me calling you a troll is dehumanization.


    Ya know, after the posts containing those quotes were deleted or I deleted most of your insults in the other thread you are now denying it ever happened.
    "I have not and did not deny insulting you, you are strawman'ing my position ... again" 
    You did and now you're just calling it a fallacy if I bring it up
    @Coveny
    namemcname
  • We live on a flat plane

    Coveny said:
    Coveny said:
    Coveny said:
    @SilverishGoldNova it's not a refute because you don't "accept" pictures as proof. So it's just an insult... so ya it's spam. 
    thats actually sorta funny but I must ask, how do you define "spam"? I
    I'll go with Oxford's definition "Irrelevant or unsolicited messages sent over the Internet, typically to a large number of users, for the purposes of advertising, phishing, spreading malware, etc".

    Since when is an argument you don't understand malware?
     
    I have no problem understanding your argument, but even if I did that's not a requirement of:

    Irrelevant messages sent over the internet to a large number of users for the purposes of advertising your beliefs.

    I get you have trouble understanding things, so you change others positions to make it something you can easily argue against and "defeat", but don't think I'm not going to call you out on that BS.
    So now creating an argument and a debate for a flat Earth is advertising? Everyone, This Fine Gentleman Who Needs To Step Up His Arguments has just discreetly called me stupid after calling debate "advertising" *cue audience laughter*
    Erfisflatnamemcname

Debate Anything on DebateIsland.com

| The Best Online Debate Experience!
2017 DebateIsland.com, All rights reserved. DebateIsland.com | The Best Online Debate Experience! Debate topics you care about in a friendly and fun way. Come try us out now. We are totally free!

Contact us

customerservice@debateisland.com
Awesome Debates
BestDealWins.com
Terms of Service

Get In Touch