This is exactly why I didn't want to correct your statements. This is getting completely off topic. I do not understand why it matters if this debate is political or not. When I said political agenda, I basically just meant your opinions. That's it. Now that is true cherry picking. I don't understand why you also assume I am a resident of USA. Nonetheless, this is completely irrelevant to the current discussion. I am not going to spend the time reading through pages of other discussions for more details on your argument. If you want to present an argument, say it here. Copy and paste something from an earlier debate if you want. Now, you can make rebuttals to the arguments I made that were not just simply me correcting misconceptions on my wording.SilverishGoldNova said:@DawnBringerRiven Lets just start a brand new chain shall we, so I get the bold lol
Literally nothing to do with politics" You have said multiple times that the government is faking globe earth and spreading globe Earth propoganda. What the government does has to do with politics. Those images simply had clouds added on to them. Why are you trusting what NAsA says in the first place? And yes, proving a flat Earth is refuting current science. It is against accepted knowledge.
So because I mentioned the NASA several times, this is now a political debate? Your fallacy is:
Why not tell me if you voted for either of the puppets, and if so which one, since I mentioned NASA afterall?
If were are talking about the Earth being flat or not, we're talking about Science. If were are talking about say Conservatism, Liberalism, Anarchism, Etc, we're discussing politics. Learn the difference.
No. It is not a rebuttal. It is me showing a clear contradiction of logic. Erfisflat claimed black holes don't exist since you cannot see them, and then claims that a gigantic invisible object exists. I was simply pointing out a contradiction, not making a rebuttal/argument.
Did you leave even look at the proof I showed you, or are you just ignoring it? Go back and read the whole debate then come back to me.
No. I admitted to disagreeing with a Flat Earther and then being met with complete rage and an array of insults.
Huh? I never said any of this.
You're not the fine gentleman who needs to step up your arguments, otherwise I wouldn't be responding to you
They only claimed to be faking the clouds.
"The last time anyone took a photo"... yeah no. Also, if you go on their website you will notice they say all of their pictures are either CGI or Paintings.
I never said this.
Wasn't directing that at you
No they haven't. You just simply claimed them to be proven fake.
http://debateisland.com/discussion/1218/the-moon-landings-were-faked Maybe instead of just reading the title then sticking by that, watch the video
A lot of horrible things in this world get done for something greater then ourselves. Humans have invented thousands of gods over thousands of years and all have become myths when belief in them stopped. The only thing needed for gods to be true is belief. One need not own beliefs of any kind to establish scientific facts, observe and enjoy nature, or live a productive, moral, and useful life.
Because of it's certainty religious faith is both arrogant and ignorant. Far from being arrogant the scientific method is one of humility. It acknowledges the limits of our current knowledge. It doesn't provide explanations or answers from a position of ignorance, but investigates the unknown in an attempt to reach understanding based on empirical evidence. Surely it is the superstitious or religious approach which claims to know the answers without any evidence except "faith" that is the arrogant approach.