@just_sayin @MayCaeser I cannot find a reasonable physical explanation to this: it simply does not seem possible for the truck to end up in this position - yet it is.
Yet it isnt and of course you cannot find a resonable physical answer. Because your up to your usual dishonest tricks of posting totally doctored made up crap from scam websites that have now been bloked.
Your bovine doodoo never stops does it?
That's not how it works. You are making the assertion about the resurrection. You are responsible for presenting compelling evidence. Not @MayCaesar. He simply doesn't believe you or the bible, you have not produce anything but hearsay. The bible isn't evidence because it's claims are not completely unique to christianity. As Zeus pointed out here: https://www.debateisland.com/discussion/comment/176945/#Comment_176945just_sayin said:If there is good evidence of Jesus' resurrection then it would show a miracle that is more than just a causal miracle but something within Christianity associated with the very system of beliefs (forgiveness of sins).MayCaesar said:The very premise of your argument does not seem sensible. If it is established that Jesus, indeed, has been resurrected, it will only suggest two things: that 1) human resurrection is possible (which in itself would have quite dramatic implications), and 2) some witness accounts of Jesus' reappearance may have more than zero credence. It will not at all imply that thousands of claims made in Christianity are true.just_sayin said:If there is good evidence for the resurrection of Jesus, then there is good reason to believe that Christianity is true. If there is not, then Christianity collapses, as the apostle Paul said
Conversely, it is possible in theory that Christianity overall is true, yet this particular event - resurrection of Jesus - never occurred. Perhaps everything else in the Bible is true, but this particular part was a product of human imagination and written in by humans into the book, corrupting it with human-created misinformation.
I think your argument is yet another illustration of how corrupt religious thinking is. It consists of finding logical connections where there are none, and removing logical connections where they are there, out of convenience. Whatever makes it easier to arrive at one's conclusion goes.
What evidence would you give to claim that Jesus's resurrection did not happen? That would really help your case if you could provide some strong evidence to support your position.