The eclipse debunks the globe/heliocentric model of the universe.

SilverishGoldNova

Erfisflat said:

"This portion of it that you bring up now is easy to understand. The moon moves west. The shadow moves west. What's the issue?"

The shadow, once again, moved from the northwest to the southeast in the eclipse. What's YOUR issue?

"Also if you don't like that one, there's also the earth's magnetic field; the explanation for which doesn't make sense in a stationary earth as it assumes a spherical earth with a molten core of metal which is moving and generating this magnetic field."

There are also magnets with a pole in the center and one a ring around it.


Oh and they took down the ae map I just figured out( wonder why?). No biggie, it has been recorded.

Ampersand

SilverishGoldNova said:

Obviously incorrect model. Has the moon continuously on the opposite side of the earth from the sun when in fact it's position changes daily and you'll regularly be able to see it in the daytime and even quite close to the sun in relative position in the sky.

Erfisflat

Globetards will be globetards..

Ampersand

Erfisflat said:

Globetards will be globetards..

Fallacious arguments, just making baseless insults.

If you have actual criticisms of arguments then feel free to provide them.

Erfisflat

Ampersand said:

Erfisflat said:

Globetards will be globetards..

Fallacious arguments, just making baseless insults.

If you have actual criticisms of arguments then feel free to provide them.

Not worth the time, I point it out and you still cherry pick and dodge, grasp at straws. More competent people need my attention.

Ampersand

@Erfisflat

More baseless claims that you have not supported.

Erfisflat

Ampersand said:

@Erfisflat

More baseless claims that you have not supported.

I'm back, for a while anyway. Holidays are crazy. The claim, which you suggest is baseless is that you cherry picked my argument. The moon has never been observed to be moving in a SOUTHwest direction. You just keep repeating that the moon moves "to the west". Cherry picking.

Erfisflat

@Ampersand
"Also if you don't like that one, there's also the earth's magnetic field; the explanation for which doesn't make sense in a stationary earth as it assumes a spherical earth with a molten core of metal which is moving and generating this magnetic field."

Magnets lose their magnetism when heated.

Ghosty

I wonder... if I asked Erfisflat and SilverishGoldNova to go to the end of the Earth and see if it's really flat instead of staying at their homes typing away their flat-earth theories...would they say yes? Or would they say something about an ice wall and say it's too cold? Or another great excuse perhaps?

Erfisflat

Ghosty said:

I wonder... if I asked Erfisflat and SilverishGoldNova to go to the end of the Earth and see if it's really flat instead of staying at their homes typing away their flat-earth theories...would they say yes? Or would they say something about an ice wall and say it's too cold? Or another great excuse perhaps?

That wasn't funny the first time.

Ghosty

@Erfisflat
I wasn't trying to be funny. I was indirectly asking you a question. Would you go to the end of the world? Yes or no. Seriously.

Erfisflat

Ghosty said:

@Erfisflat
I wasn't trying to be funny. I was indirectly asking you a question. Would you go to the end of the world? Yes or no. Seriously.

Several things prevent me personally from sneaking over to Antarctica. You're just trolling, so I won't bother humoring you.