frame

Atheist Epistemology

Opening Argument

Can any atheist provide me their rational basis for knowing truth from fiction?
«134

Debra AI Prediction

Predicted To Win
Predicted 2nd Place
22%
Margin

Details +


Status: Open Debate


Arguments

  • Evidence, logic, likelihood.
    Hank
  • No question begging.  How do you know evidence from delusion?  How do you know you are being logiCal?  How do you know the stats?
  • Nothing is for certain in science. NOTHING. Their are always uncertainty. Their is a reason they are called theory's. I believe things when they have the best of evidence. Yes their is a chance that I am wrong. Their always is. As Einstein said you should go with the simplest answer. If their is a 99.99999% chance I am right. Well then I treat it normally as if it were true. I am not necessarily an atheist but I can act like one. I can't prove god does not exist so I won't say he does not exist. But with no evidence to prove he exist I don't bother with him. To say he exits would be to jump to a huge conclusion for no reason. Their are many things you can't prove are not real. But with no reason to say they are I don't bother with them. : )
    Hank
  • How does a Theist know fact from fiction? How does God know fact from fiction?
    DrCereal
  • OOPS! I just realized I am technically not an atheist. I will leave this Debate. Sorry <span>:blush:</span> : )
  • @PowerPikachu21

    No irrational red herrings.  Answer the OP or move on.  Thanks.
    DrCereal
  • How do I know truth from fiction?

    I only know two things: 1. that I can think and 2. that I can perceive. Since the only collection of objects I can perceive is the world, I assume (though do not know) that truths and falsities are determined soley by it. My perceptions and thoughts make up propositions. I check the validity of those propositions with logic (a process which is inherently knowable to me and is impossible to imagine not existing), and I check their continual soundness by perceiving the world. With these propositions and this process, I can determine what is "fact" and what is "fiction".

    (Sorry if this response is confusing, as this is the first time I have thoroughly thought about this matter.)
    Bis das, si cito das.
  • @DrCereal

    I did not ask what you know, but how you know what you claim to know.  You seem to answer with your perceptions, but how do you know they are not the product of your being delusional?
  • @DrCereal

    I did not ask what you know, but how you know what you claim to know.  You seem to answer with your perceptions, but how do you know they are not the product of your being delusional?
    Ah, I reread your original question.

    My rational basis for "knowing" (I would say that it is more of an assumption) what is truth and fiction is that I can not possibly imagine the nonexistence of my process of distinguishing between the two. I can not imagine a world where logic isn't valid (e.g. where the law of contradiction is false); I can not imagine not thinking; and I can not imagine not being able to perceive anything. I thusly must rationally assume that all these things exist and are reliable.

    "You seem to answer with your perceptions, but how do you know they are not the product of your being delusional?"
    The world that I perceive seems to be continuous so there is no actual way for me to distinguish between it being an "actual" or "delusional" world, and since the world does appear to be continuous, it is the world regardless if it is the "actual" or "delusional" world. There is no reason to assume that either is more "real" than the other because the only way they would be different from one another is if I was aware of one being a delusion.

    (Again, sorry. My thoughts are starting to become very hard to convey.)
    Bis das, si cito das.
  • @DrCereal

    So your basis for your knowledge claims is your poor imagination?!?!?!  And your poor imagination not withstanding, one does not have to question logic or perceptions, to question your logic and your perceptions.   I am sorry, but as expected, you have failed to provide me a rational way an atheist can tell truth from fiction.  Sorry.
    DrCereal
  • DrCerealDrCereal 99 Pts
    edited November 2017
    @DrCereal

    So your basis for your knowledge claims is your poor imagination?!?!?!  And your poor imagination not withstanding, one does not have to question logic or perceptions, to question your logic and your perceptions.   I am sorry, but as expected, you have failed to provide me a rational way an atheist can tell truth from fiction.  Sorry.
    I at least expected some refutation.

    It appears I have wasted my time.
    Since you have provided no adequate rebuttal, I will take it upon myself to refute my own argument. I will then come back to provide a better answer.
    Bis das, si cito das.
  • ViceRegent claims he knows truth from fiction, but he's really delusional.
  • @PowerPikachu21

    I am delusional?  Is this true?  How do you know?
  • Can anyone know truth from fiction? I don't anyone can. If I think something is true with rationality, then that's all that matters to me. It doesn't matter if it is actually true or not. This is only to the extent of where the human brain can't comprehend things, so I'm not saying this applies to everything. 
  • @ViceRegent
    How so? I'm simply saying that no one can truly prove that God exists, or God doesn't exist, or we live in a simulation. It is beyond my comprehension just like it is beyond any human's comprehension. If I think I exist, then I exist. That's all that matters to me. It doesn't matter if I don't exist in reality and it's all just a simulation. 
  • @ViceRegent
    This is ad hominem. No need for insults. How do you expect to convince me with insults? This is a civilized debate site. If you want to insult people then go to the youtube comment section. 

    In my argument I stated that:
    "This is only to the extent of where the human brain can't comprehend things, so I'm not saying this applies to everything. "
    My argument only applies to a certain extent. 
    How funny that a dude who admits he cannot fact from fiction makes truth claims he expects me to take seriously.  Did I not say mentally ill?
    Your statement that I admitted to not be able to separate fact from fiction is true, but only in a certain extent. My truth claims are not incomprehensible to the human brain, therefore I can say them without contradiction. 
  • @Fascism

    And now come the non-sequiturs.

    If we taught children logic in government schools, there would be fewer atheists, but then again, the last thing the state wants is an educated population.
    DrCerealFascism
  • AmpersandAmpersand 81 Pts
    edited November 2017
    The OP is making a solipsistic argument. As ever the response to solipsism is "Who cares?"

    It can't be disproven, but at the same time by every observable metric it also doesn't matter.
  • FascismFascism 248 Pts
    edited November 2017
    @ViceRegent
    Care to explain how it is a non-sequitur instead of just saying it is?

    Once again, an ad hominem implying that atheists aren't properly educated. 
  • @Ampersand

    This OP is asking a Q, not making an argument.   And did you really just say the ability to know truth from fiction does not matter?  Yep, that is atheism for you:  irrational and ignorant to the core.
    DrCereal
  • @Fascism

    How can I explain logic to someone who is ignorant of it but so arrogant as to think they know all about it.  Answer the OP, or move on.
    DrCerealFascism
  • No wonder this dude hates the freedom that is capitalism.
    DrCerealFascism
  • @Ampersand

    This OP is asking a Q, not making an argument.   And did you really just say the ability to know truth from fiction does not matter?  Yep, that is atheism for you:  irrational and ignorant to the core.
    If "the truth" is something that is undetectable to all senses, reason, logic, emotion, etc, etc then by definition it is something that has no impact on me.

    Either my observable reality is real or my observable reality is not real but in every conceivable way that  relates to me works as if it were real. Either way I would be foolish to treat it as fake.

    Counter question: Can you provide a rational basis for why you aren't a five year old black Kenyan girl, providing utter certainty that what you believe you experience is not a delusion?
  • @ViceRegent
    @Fascism

    How can I explain logic to someone who is ignorant of it but so arrogant as to think they know all about it.  Answer the OP, or move on.
    I might be ignorant and arrogant, but if you at least try to explain it to me then you can at least show others that you know what you're talking about. As of now all you're doing is spamming ad hominem, without any explanation. In other people's eyes you lost the argument and are just insulting me. 
    Also, quote the statement which I made which convinces you that I am arrogant and ignorant. 

    No wonder this dude hates the freedom that is capitalism.
    This is a completely different argument. Go and argue in my debate about fascism if you actually have a sound argument. This has nothing to do with the current argument. 
    DrCerealMissDMeanorNonCredenti
  • @Ampersand

    How do you know it works?  Or is this claim the product of your deluded thinking?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Back To Top

DebateIsland.com | The Best Online Debate Website!

| The Best Online Debate Experience!
2018 DebateIsland.com, All rights reserved. DebateIsland.com | The Best Online Debate Experience! Debate topics you care about in a friendly and fun way. Come try us out now. We are totally free!

Contact us

customerservice@debateisland.com
Awesome Debates
BestDealWins.com
Terms of Service

Get In Touch