The Island of Dr. Moreau and Vivisection

Opening Argument

The Island of Dr. Moreau and Vivisection

"The Island of Dr. Moreau" by H.G. Wells      Link:

(Has been converted into Movie(s) format as well)

" The Island of Doctor Moreau" is the account of a Mr. Edward Prendick, a shipwrecked man who washed up on the mysterious island home of Doctor Moreau, a mercurial figure who creates human-like hybrid beings from animals via vivisection. Prendick, as an observer and a guest, goes through an induced madness and an existential crisis in his analysis of his host and the bizarre work he's done in this timeless science fiction classic."

"While this riveting tale was intended to be a commentary on evolution, divine creation, and the tension between human nature and culture, modern readers familiar with genetic engineering will marvel at Wells’s prediction of the ethical issues raised by producing “smarter” human beings or bringing back extinct species. These levels of interpretation add a richness to Prendick’s adventures on Dr. Moreau’s island of lost souls without distracting from what is still a rip-roaring good read."


"Vivisection, or operating on living animals for the purposes of scientific research, has a long history in medicine. It is still practiced today, in part as an alternative to experimenting on people.

Before the publication of Darwin's theory of evolution, animal experimentation was more or less tolerated in England and other countries. Very few people considered animals as anything but inferior species, so anti-cruelty legislation was all but absent. But once Darwin's theory broke down the barrier between human and animal in the popular mind, many people felt a stronger connection to the "lesser creatures." The idea that there might be unbroken lines of descent connecting species to common ancestors ultimately served to humanize the animals (at least, the ones that seemed most human to begin with). Protests of inhumane treatment of animals became increasingly prevalent. As a result, there was something of a backlash against scientists who had been involved in vivisection.

Wells tapped into the horror and empathy generated by vivisection in his creating a story in which the main emotional weight is carried by the animals rather than the men. His story had the potential to persuade others that vivisectionists were like Moreau in their coldness to animals' pain.

The vivisection debate is part of a general debate about to what length scientists should be allowed to stretch morality in the pursuit of knowledge. Darwin himself felt quite conflicted about vivisection, and he eventually acknowledged that although the practice disgusted him, it was justifiable in the pursuit of knowledge. But Moreau's base curiosity seems to cross the line."

  1. Is Vivisecting Animals for Research Justified?

    1 vote
    1. Yes
    2. No
  2. Was Dr. Moreau Justified in Creating Half-Beast/Half Human Creatures?

    1 vote
    1. Yes
    2. No

Debra AI Prediction

Predicted To Win
Predicted 2nd Place

Details +

Status: Open Debate


  • OK!
Sign In or Register to comment.

Back To Top | The Best Online Debate Website!

| The Best Online Debate Experience!
2018, All rights reserved. | The Best Online Debate Experience! Debate topics you care about in a friendly and fun way. Come try us out now. We are totally free!

Contact us
Awesome Debates
Terms of Service

Get In Touch