It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Yes I believe that God exists but I do not believe He is an entity of good or evil, these are human concepts. I think he created the universe for his own amusement like a computer game. Sometimes he helps or hurts some character or other out of curiosity, to see what will happen
A lot of horrible things in this world get done for something greater then ourselves. Humans have invented thousands of gods over thousands of years and all have become myths when belief in them stopped. The only thing needed for gods to be true is belief. One need not own beliefs of any kind to establish scientific facts, observe and enjoy nature, or live a productive, moral, and useful life.
Because of it's certainty religious faith is both arrogant and ignorant. Far from being arrogant the scientific method is one of humility. It acknowledges the limits of our current knowledge. It doesn't provide explanations or answers from a position of ignorance, but investigates the unknown in an attempt to reach understanding based on empirical evidence. Surely it is the superstitious or religious approach which claims to know the answers without any evidence except "faith" that is the arrogant approach.
I personally believe in God, not because there's empirical evidence that he exists, but because I have faith in a higher power. Simply put, Scientists have been tossing aside their very own code and systems for decades while trying to explain the origins of life. Why? Because you cannot attempt to explain the origin of life without conceding that it cannot be observed, tested or experimented.
@Vaulk Seems you don't know too much about the scientific method
Why would a theist make something that isn't compatible with his religion?
And god doesn't have to be in the realm of the super natural alone, Why not the realm of the un seen?
Hubble is a plane.
Timeless debate of all time. Please vote and explain your position.
Religion is theory.
Science is simply a process we use to verify theories. As yet we have not been able to verify the existence of a god.
There is no evidence or proof of the existence of any sort of god. Because of this, I believe, as a rational person, that there is no god, however I am open to the existence of one if you can prove to me beyond the shadow of a doubt that there is a chance one exists. However, the only arguments I have had are very easily disproven and do not even come close to beggining to prove the existence of a god. The fact of the matter is that we have evidence to suggest that something such as the theory of the big bang is what created the universe. By observing our universe, the evidence leads to a logical conclusion. We cannot say for certain, it is just a theory, however there is more evidence to support whereas the no evidence to support the existence of a god.Feel free to challenge me to this and attempt to prove me wrong and try to prove god exists. Who knows, maybe you will come up with something original.
@Erfisflat - Before I even consider humoring you on this. Do you even care what science says about it? Or do you simply consider it nonsense since it doesn't fit to your agenda?
@Sylynn Just read and all the science you've learned pretty much fits on the model.