You ignored the fact
I ignored nothing. You denied that they are Israeli settlements, which is objectively untrue. East Jerusalem was seized by Israel in 1967.
those being evicted are squatters
They are not squatters. That is also objectively untrue.
and are simply living in the homes of the Jews
The old lady interviewed in the video has been living in the same home -- her own home -- since childhood. You have told three separate falsehoods in the space of three sentences. I'll not even engage you further because you are a nauseatingly dishonest toad.
Edit: And I see you're using your alt account to fist-bump your own false statements. That's your idea of "intellectual debate", is it? Relentlessly spamming false statements and using your own accounts to agree with yourself?
You're a horrible person. Truly horrible.
Nope, not wrong.Nomenclature said:@JulesKorngoldTrump will be arrested this week. How wrong you geniuses are.Mhm. How wrong we were. Oh no wait, we weren't wrong.
You denied that they are Israeli settlements, which is objectively untrue.Demonstrate how this is the case.
They are not squatters. That is also objectively untrue.In 1982, the Jewish owners (Sephardic Community Committee and the Knesset Israel Committee) sued the Palestinian families residing in Sheikh Jarrah and demanded their eviction on the basis that they were squatters on the property. The Magistrate Court determined that the Palestinian families could not demonstrate their ownership of the property, but that they enjoyed Protected Tenant Status. As protected tenants, they would be able to continue living on the property as long as they paid rent and maintained the property. This arrangement was agreed upon mutually in an agreement signed by the parties, in which the tenants recognized the trusts’ ownership in exchange for protected tenant status. - https://www.jns.org/sheikh-jarrah-a-legal-background/
The old lady interviewed in the video has been living in the same home -- her own home -- since childhood. You have told three separate falsehoods in the space of three sentences. I'll not even engage you further because you are a nauseatingly dishonest toad.And she has been a squatter in the residence since childhood, so what?
Edit: And I see you're using your alt account to fist-bump your own false statements. That's your idea of "intellectual debate", is it? Relentlessly spamming false statements and using your own accounts to agree with yourself?You caught me, Jules and I are clearly alts
Tell us some more about how the people you stole East Jerusalem from are squatting in their own homes. NaziFirstly, East Jerusalem was stolen by the Jordanians during the 1948 war, and even after the 1967 war, assuming that Israel did in fact steal it from Jordan. They signed a peace treaty regarding the validity of Israeli control over Judea and Samaria. The opinion of the international community is irrelevant regarding the legality of the issue if both parties come to peace with the annexation.
You're a horrible person. Truly horrible.Says the one who calls me a nauseatingly dishonest toad, among other insults. You berate every individual you debate with little to no argumentation, you have thus far failed to demonstrate how they have a legal claim to the land, and so your argument is void.
Uh-huh. Someone is vewy angwy.Nomenclature said:@JulesKorngoldYou are a lecherous, absurd, pathologically dishonest Zionist hypocrite who spends all his time projecting his crimes onto other people. Get out of my debate you pathetic creep.
Nomenclature said:
Nomenclature said:
This is their "contribution" to the debate.Nomenclature said:@jackCould it be, perhaps, to stir up Antisemitism?? NahhhLook, you insanely dumb individual...You're a total, window-licking moron.