Why do you think the NY Judge moved up the sentencing of President Trump?

Factfinder

@just_sayin

Without doing any research besides reading the article in your link I'd say it was a legal decision that made sense. I don't think anything was politically motivated about it though it appears Mr. Trumps views on the court system was an affront to him personally though. I was a little surprised the judge let that bit of info into the written decision but over all it was a good one. Trump can still appeal as I would, I mean a porn star suing cause she got paid,(?) come on. And he's practically all but guaranteed no sentencing including jail time, the sentencing will be discharged.

Now that concerns me a bit. What would happen if when he showed up for sentencing if he was jailed and the judge was politically motivated thereby bringing him in to make a public display? What would we do, how would we react as a country?

marke

@just_sayin
The democrat devils are still trying to destroy President Trump and this sentencing of him just before he takes office for a crime he did not commit is just the latest of a long history of hateful attacks on him for opposing their corruption.

jack

just_sayin said:

What do you think motivated the NY Judge to move up Trump's sentencing? 

Hello just_:

Uhhh, cause he was found guilty of 34 felonies..  Now, that's a lotta felony's, and believe me, I know about felony's

excon

polytheistwitch

This topic has nothing to do with religion.

marke

@jack

Trump was unjustly convicted of dozens of felonies he did not commit.  That is how wicked fascist tyrants deal with their political opponents.

just_sayin

polytheistwitch said:

This topic has nothing to do with religion.

Thanks for pointing out my mistake.  I appreciate it.

just_sayin

jack said:

just_sayin said:

What do you think motivated the NY Judge to move up Trump's sentencing? 

Hello just_:

Uhhh, cause he was found guilty of 34 felonies..  Now, that's a lotta felony's, and believe me, I know about felony's

excon

The 34 felonies require that the jury assume that Trump was found guilty of another crime he was never even charged with.  With all due respect @Jack, if Trump's hush money to someone was election interference, than that crime should have been prosecuted.  This was indeed a shame trial, where the 34 charges he was found guilty for were dependent upon him being found guilty for a charge he was never even charged with.  It was politically driven - be honest with yourself @Jack.  

jack

just_sayin said:

The 34 felonies require that the jury assume that Trump was found guilty of another crime he was never even charged with. 

Hello just_:

Uhhh, NO..  That ain't the way the law works.  Not even close.  Haven't you ever watched Law and Order, or Perry Mason??  Du*de.

excon

marke

@jack

The wicked unjustly and illegally impeached Trump and hauled him into court on unjust twists of the law and yet they think their legal processes were unbiased and aboveboard.  The wicked simply deceive themselves into believing good is evil and evil is good.