frame

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.


In this Debate




On balance, the benefits of United States participation in the North American Free Trade Agreement

Debate Information

On balance, the benefits of United States participation in the North American Free Trade Agreement outweigh the consequences.

NAFTA is 
an agreement signed by CanadaMexico, and the United States, creating a trilateral trade bloc in North America. The agreement came into force on January 1, 1994.[4] It superseded the Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement between the U.S. and Canada.
By eliminating tariffs, NAFTA increases investment opportunities. The NAFTA agreement is 2,000 pages, with eight sections and 22 chapters. 
The three signatories agreed to remove trade barriers between them.

Why NAFTA's Six Advantages Outweigh Its Six Disadvantages
https://www.thebalance.com/nafta-pros-and-cons-3970481

it led to the loss of 500,000-750,000 U.S. jobs
job migration suppressed wages
Third, NAFTA put Mexican farmers out of business.

joecavalry
  1. Live Poll

    On balance, the benefits of United States participation in the North American Free Trade Agreement

    2 votes
    1. Yes
        0.00%
    2. No
      100.00%
Live Long and Prosper



Debra AI Prediction

Predicted To Win
Predicted 2nd Place
56%
Margin

Details +




Post Argument Now Debate Details +

    Arguments


  • bandnerd126bandnerd126 4 Pts   -  
    Reasons to choose the negation of this article in which is standing firmly when stating that  United States participation's consequences outweigh the benefits.

    Reasons to choose NEGATION of the resolution:

      (Source 1: thebalance.com)

    N.A.F.T.A : led to the loss of 500,000-750,000 U.S. jobs. Most were in the manufacturing industries in California, New York, Michigan, and Texas. Many manufacturing companies moved to Mexico because labor was cheap. The automotive, textile, computer, and electrical appliance industries were impacted the most.

    Second, job migration suppressed wages. Companies threatened to move to Mexico to keep workers from joining unions. Without the unions, workers could not bargain for better wages. This strategy was so successful that it became standard operating procedure. Between 1993 and 1995, half of all companies used it. By 1999, that rate had grown to 65 percent. 

    Third, NAFTA put Mexican farmers out of business. It allowed U.S. government-subsidized farm products into Mexico. Local farmers could not compete with the subsidized prices. As a result, 1.3 million farmers were put out of business, according to the Economic Policy Institute. It forced unemployed farmers to cross the border illegally to find work. In 1995, there were 2.9 million Mexicans living in  the United States illegally. It increased to 4.5 million in 2000, probably due to NAFTA

     

      

    The recession drove that figure to 6.9 million in 2007. In 2014, it fell to 5.8 million, roughly double where it was before NAFTA.

    Fourth, unemployed Mexican farmers went to work in substandard conditions in the maquiladora program. Maquiladora is where United States-owned companies employ Mexican workers near the border. They cheaply assemble products for export back into the United States. The program grew to employ 30 percent of Mexico's labor force. 

    Fifth, U.S. companies degraded the Mexican environment to keep costs low. Agribusiness in Mexico used more fertilizers and other chemicals. The result was $36 billion more per year in pollution. Rural farmers were forced into marginal land to stay in business. They cut down 630,000 hectares of forests per year. That deforestation contributes to global warming.

    Sixth, NAFTA allowed Mexican trucks access into the United States. Mexican trucks are not held to the same safety standards as American trucks. Congress never allowed this provision to go into effect.

    Immigration

     

    Forced jobless Mexicans to cross the border illegally

    Workers

     

    U.S. unions lost leverage. Mexican workers were exploited

    Environment

     

    Canada exploited shale fields. Mexican environment deteriorated

       

Sign In or Register to comment.

Back To Top

DebateIsland.com

| The Best Online Debate Experience!
© 2023 DebateIsland.com, all rights reserved. DebateIsland.com | The Best Online Debate Experience! Debate topics you care about in a friendly and fun way. Come try us out now. We are totally free!

Contact us

customerservice@debateisland.com
Terms of Service

Get In Touch