frame

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.





Would you opt for a genetically engineered child if offered that option ?

Debate Information


CRISPR Invented in 2012, the genetic engineering technique, which is capable of quickly, easily and inexpensively performing precise changes in DNA, saw dramatically increased interest in 2015, and shows no signs of a slowdown as we enter 2016. 

The main concern with CRISPR is that it can be used to perform germline genetic modifications, which means making changes in a human egg, sperm or embryo. These modifications would be passed down for generations, impacting an entire lineage rather than just one person.Will removing one disease give rise to a different disease? Could a brand new disease spring up? What will changes and splices in DNA mean for the overall human genome?

Another concern is this technology could open the door to what is called “designer babies,” or genetically engineered children. For example, someone could use CRISPR to “make” a highly intelligent, brown-haired, blue-eyed child, or one that is given both height and athletic ability. The possibilities are endless—as are the ethical implications.





Debra AI Prediction

Predicted To Win
Predicted 2nd Place
11%
Margin

Details +




Post Argument Now Debate Details +

    Arguments


  • If, say that my family was prone to heart disease or some sort of cancer, in that case, I would use CRISPR. But only for that. Designer babies are unethical. When you do that, you treat them like products rather than humans.
    cheesycheeseZombieguy1987
    Not every quote you read on the internet is true- Abraham Lincoln
  • whiteflamewhiteflame 689 Pts   -  
    There are two issues at play here, so I'll separate them.

    CRISPR is not a perfect technology. Much as it is highly specific, tests done in animals have yielded about an 80% success rate. That's really good for research studies, and if we're doing screening of embryos for implantation, it might be sufficient for humans undergoing in vitro fertilization as yet another means of screening through genetic abnormalities. Some families might not want to take the risk of failure, though, and that's understandable. CRISPR can cleave in the wrong location, but if there's a screening step to check the location at which a new gene is inserted, I don't see a reason to believe that it could cause a new disease or have any substantive effects downstream. Our genome is full of movable elements, including virus genomes and transposons. Much as many would like to believe that our genomes are immutable, they're actually pretty malleable in this regard, and while there are certainly reasonable concerns about interrupting certain necessary genes that may prevent a certain kind of cancer or maintain immune responses, those are likely to become more and more minor as the technology improves.

    As for the ethical concerns... honestly, I don't know why this is an issue. It sounds a lot like the issue people have with genetically modified foods, the idea that there's something inherently "good" about the natural process of segregating genes and something inherently "bad" about site-specific changes. In many ways, we already try to "design" our children, often based on the mates we choose, the genetic counseling we receive (particularly for those with genetic diseases or a propensity for them), and any screening that goes on pre- and post-implantation. There are limits to what this can produce, of course, but I don't see why expanding beyond those limitations suddenly makes it ethically suspect. Why shouldn't parents try to ensure that their children have the best possible genetic code when so much of what they will go through in life is subject to chaos and uncertainty? And why does going through this process, as @AmericanFurryBoy puts it, "treat them like products rather than humans"? Is wanting the best for your child and actively seeking it through genetic engineering dehumanizing, and if so, how? It seems to me that being so focused on their well-being shows a desire to do what is best for the child.
  • @whiteflame
    Is making them taller or giving them other, atributes the best for them? I just don’t think its right to be able to choose stuff like that. If you wanted genes for those, you should’ve chosen a better mate.
    Also, I thin I’m GMOs are perfectly fine.
    Not every quote you read on the internet is true- Abraham Lincoln
  • whiteflamewhiteflame 689 Pts   -  
    @whiteflame
    Is making them taller or giving them other, atributes the best for them? I just don’t think its right to be able to choose stuff like that. If you wanted genes for those, you should’ve chosen a better mate.
    Also, I thin I’m GMOs are perfectly fine.
    The line between what's beneficial to them and what is desired by the parents is a tricky one, and I don't think it's one that anyone can easily define. To your question, I would say that many would prefer to have a height advantage both for themselves and for their children, but if we're talking about a medical reason to favor height, I could just mention that dwarfism can lead to serious medical problems that could be avoided by ensuring that the child is producing enough human growth hormone. Similarly, parents would want to avoid gigantism, which comes with its own set of problems, meaning they will seek to ensure that the amount of this hormone is regulated to some degree. Seeking to fall somewhere within those two zones seems like something parents should genuinely care about for the sake of their child. As for specifying specific heights, that might not matter quite so much, but I don't see an inherent harm to it. 

    I suppose where I take the greatest issue with your argument, though, is this line: "If you wanted genes for those, you should’ve chosen a better mate." If I'm reading you right, then what you're saying is that parents who want to have children with certain genetic characteristics should find someone who is genetically capable of providing those traits. So, essentially, parents can ethically select for specific traits, so long as they're doing it the old-fashioned way: find someone who has those traits and hope they segregate well. I'm not sure what your position is on in vitro fertilization, where embryos are screened for specific problems before implantation, but that is essentially doing the same thing except with more trials in rapid succession. If both of these are ethical (and I'm assuming that you believe they are), then why is the specific selection of certain traits before they are used to form an actual or potential person unethical? If you're fine with GMOs, which are essentially doing the same thing (the alternative is cross-breeding, which is a lot like in vitro fertilization in this regard), why can/should it not apply to humans?
  • MayCaesarMayCaesar 5965 Pts   -  
    It seems to be a no-brainer to me. Genetic modification is one of the most promising venues in our evolution, and modifying the embryos in order for the children to come out better is the step in the right direction.

    That said, I personally would be more interested in modification of my own genes (which should not be much more difficult technologically, than modification of an embryo's genes), since I am not planning on having children, and I would like to live for centuries - which should become realistic and affordable within my lifetime. 

    Genetic engineering and cyber-enhancement is how we move forward as a species.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Back To Top

DebateIsland.com

| The Best Online Debate Experience!
© 2023 DebateIsland.com, all rights reserved. DebateIsland.com | The Best Online Debate Experience! Debate topics you care about in a friendly and fun way. Come try us out now. We are totally free!

Contact us

customerservice@debateisland.com
Terms of Service

Get In Touch