A question, are some Millinials and some of the baby boomers, using the existence of the internet, to try to coax, persuade, or influence, the other internet users into trying to get others to see things their way, via their individual ways of thinking?
Religion, along with (God & Jesus) seems to be a popular indulgence of conversation?
The Democrats, and the Socialists Democrats, and how apparently want to change society, for the individual benefits of their followers, and or fan bases, and for themselves as well, seems to be a popular indulgence of conversation?
Some food for thought on the Democrats, and the Socialists Democrats:https://mobile.twitter.com/FrankLuntz/status/1114365734061137920?ref_src=twsrc^google|twcamp^serp|twgr^tweet
From Mr. Frank Lutz via Twitter:
“38% of Democrats said they weren’t willing to vote for a socialist, and 73% of Republicans said the same.”
The non race on race crimes, and race on race crimes conversations, seem to be an occasional conversation of indulgence, whenever a situation presents itself, and some of the local news media outlets point out those crimes via their individual news coverages?
Here's a term that I came across because of the above occurrences:https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Same-race_discrimination
"One form of racism
is same-race discrimination
, wherein the perpetrator and the object of the discrimination are of the same racial group."
Could the above, be a reason for why some of the non race on race, and the race on race crimes have occurred?
Because of same race discrimination?
(Another popular conversation of indulgence, see the below.)
Or when there are some of the illegal aliens, or immigrants coming into the U.S. illegally, might that be another form of discrimination towards the rest of the U.S. citizens who aren't pro illegal alien, or immigrant oriented?
Because there are apparently some U.S. citizens, who are maybe more focused, or concerned over their own bottom dollar, instead of how the illegal aliens, or immigrants might be affecting the overall csafety of the U.S. public?
I wonder if the above could be viewed as financial discrimination?