frame

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.





Couple faces possible fines or jail time for using RIGHT to religious liberty, and free speech.

Debate Information




Debra AI Prediction

Predicted To Win
Predicted 2nd Place
22%
Margin

Details +




Post Argument Now Debate Details +

    Arguments


  • all4acttall4actt 304 Pts   -  
    I think private buisness owners should have the right to run their buisness' the way they see fit.

    Afterall it can be to their detriment to cut off certain parts of the population but that still needs to be their choice.

    Especially a small buisness should have the the right to refuse service to anyone.

    In most of these cases it isn't like they can't go somewhere else to get what they need.
    Zombieguy1987
  • MayCaesarMayCaesar 5947 Pts   -   edited August 2019
    There are laws in some states extending anti-censorship protections to the private space for certain groups of people. Those laws do not necessarily violate the Constitution (note that the First Amendment only applies to congressional activities), but they are highly discriminatory by their nature, and obviously violating the business owners' property rights.

    At the same time, there is also the principle stating that public advertisement by default implies a unilateral contract offering, albeit what constitutes acceptance of the contract is a subject to debate.

    Morally, the verdict is corrupt. Legally, it is not obvious whether it is proper or not.
  • jesusisGod777jesusisGod777 115 Pts   -  
    The argument that people should live how they want to free from opression fails to provide ample reason that they are jailed in the first place, because the right extends to Christians.

    Christian persecutions real.

    Obviously, because of what is real, people sin and desire to disobey the Lord God Jesus the Christ.

    A Christian may face man's jail but the disobeidient face Jesus Christs eternal jail.


    Plaffelvohfen
Sign In or Register to comment.

Back To Top

DebateIsland.com

| The Best Online Debate Experience!
© 2023 DebateIsland.com, all rights reserved. DebateIsland.com | The Best Online Debate Experience! Debate topics you care about in a friendly and fun way. Come try us out now. We are totally free!

Contact us

customerservice@debateisland.com
Terms of Service

Get In Touch