Should late term abortion be legal, to save the baby, from a life of suffering? - The Best Online Debate Website | DebateIsland.com - Debate Anything The Best Online Debate Website | DebateIsland.com
frame

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

The Best Online Debate Website | DebateIsland.com. The only online debate website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the leading online debate website. Debate popular topics, debate news, or debate anything! Debate online for free! DebateIsland is utilizing Artifical Intelligence to transform online debating.


Communities

The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!

Should late term abortion be legal, to save the baby, from a life of suffering?
in Politics

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/02/opinion/letters/abortion-late-term.html 
Once the fetus has sufficient brain activity, I call it a baby, but if the baby would really suffer, I think the mother has the right to abort him.
SkepticalOne



Debra AI Prediction

Predicted To Win
Predicted 2nd Place
33%
Margin

Details +



Arguments

  • https://www.nytimes.com/2019/11/02/opinion/letters/abortion-late-term.html 
    Once the fetus has sufficient brain activity, I call it a baby, but if the baby would really suffer, I think the mother has the right to abort him.

    There is a violation of the hypocritic oath made in the statement of pregnancy abortion which alienates some woman, and or people form possible medical care.

    No, the horrid idea placed in a person’s head that an pregnancy abortion over female specific amputation is okay, or can be somehow justified is attempt to instruct other how to be negligent in constitutional equality in justice for woman, it is absurd.

    A terminal illness is not a reason to insist a self-incrimination be circulated publicly in the general welfare of woman, fertile woman who may become pregnant. The additional problem is that when we openly make a single choices between to states that violate the medical hypocritic oath it may become harder for people to seek treatment medically from those people who need treatment, maintaining the oath on behalf of our Doctor is part of the patient obligation for medical treatments. This is not measured by right it is described as necessity.

    A mother may be suffering for trauma in relationship to a child’s medical condition, terminal or otherwise, exploiting that duress by insistence that woman self-incriminate in a termination of immigration across a international border is negligent. That a woman would move to publicly crucify other woman in this way is inexcusable.

    There is a move to alienate the process of marriage as a general form of registration of childbirth by announcement, a formal immigration process by licensing. Again, self-interests are played on to avoid the responsibility to create all woman as equal in the matter of reproduction and recreational courtship for mating by woman and men. Again abortion is a admission by the self-incrimination a woman can self-incriminate herself, legislation has had duty to insure presumption of innocents as tranquility to the general welfare.

    All woman saying she may be responsible for the official end of immigration is not the same as having all woman state they must bear the weight of officially end human life. The 2nd Amendment has a much larger constitutional defense as it relates to lethal force then said in attacks against the right to bear arm. 


  • Late term abortions should be legal, regardless of the reasons invoked... Yours is as good as any...  Don't mind the previous poster, the Hippocratic oath is not legally binding so it's irrelevant here...
    " Adversus absurdum, contumaciter ac ridens! "
  • SO HAVE YOU NOTOICED THAT WOMAN ARE DEBATING.... IF A ADMISSION DESCRIBING CRIME IS LEGAL OR NOT. This is not an accusation of, it is a calling of black kettle, black. There is an open neglect to hear the admission of a homicide crime that is made public in a court of law, when it is made. Remember abortion would be a choice to give up United State Constitutional right to remain silent. By saying Female Specific Amputation, I along with other woman, men, and Medical Doctors are in a way remaining silent, as instructed, though only to the complex self-incrimination spread by pregnancy abortion legislation and debate. An accident is one thing

    Crimes against a licensed medical society can be proven as relevant as they are uncovered, found, identified, or understood. This goes with crimes against woman who have not been placed united State Constitution as created equal as well. MIND AND HEED WARNING. The grace period of woman creating all woman as equal under united state constitution is over. woman are welcome to preserve United State Constitution but like men fall short in the creator area by their own natural united state.

    plaffeivohfen, 

    YeshuaBought

    Do you, or do you not have clear legal reason why a woman can not have, or receive a female specific amputation?


Sign In or Register to comment.

Back To Top

DebateIsland.com

| The Best Online Debate Experience!
2019 DebateIsland.com, All rights reserved. DebateIsland.com | The Best Online Debate Experience! Debate topics you care about in a friendly and fun way. Come try us out now. We are totally free!

Contact us

customerservice@debateisland.com
Awesome Debates
BestDealWins.com
Terms of Service

Get In Touch