The message in the above image is that as I am an eagle and everyone knows I cannot swim, nevertheless, atheists would ignore the fact that I am also not accredited with any ability or knowledge of how to walk on water, either. Instead of debating why it is that I can suddenly walk on water - an observable fact because I have demonstrated it - they will argue the only reason I do this is because I cannot swim, declining to acknowledge that the inability to swim does not explain or prove the reason why I can walk on water. They treat material evidence on the historical record, regarding occurrences involving Christ, which are verified and authenticated, in the same way.
They do the same in the scientific discipline, denying the impact of DNA, that it is evidence of Intelligent Design in creation. Atheists deny that. Why? They do the same regarding Einstein's equation, E=mc², concerning the question of relativity. I don't think atheists truly understand the implications of Einstein's equation, which he said himself proves the existence of a higher intelligence, yet atheists will not accept even the scientist's own words on this. Why do atheists do this? The reason is obvious. It is because the facts do not support their position, so they are compelled to deny them, which subsequently sees them denying the historical and verified record, no matter how well-documented and authenticated it is. Can atheists prove me wrong?
The further back we look, the greater forward insight we can have. History speaks.