If there is one argument that regularly surfaces in this forum from theists, it is that life is too complicated to be an accident therefore it must have a creator.
From a logical point of view however, this viewpoint holds no substance since it is taking a non-stated point (that life came to be by accident), then refuting with an untested assumption (too complicated) and a single choice alternative (creation).
Life on Earth is certainly no accident and by learning the interaction of natural laws and forces we can understand how life did come about without there being any intervention whatsoever.
One argument against evolution that made me think was the idea that shaking a bag of amino acid will not start the life process.
However, if we get 10 billion bags of amino acid and shake them for 11 billion years, what might be the chances of something happening?
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments