We have seen many attempts by creationists to discredit the irrefutable and conclusive evidence of evolution by natural selection.
for example, "the missing link" argument is popular among creationists at making a futile attempt to discredit the origin of mankind. Of course, we know this to be an erroneous " introduced fallacy" argument since irrespective of such "missing evidence" the overwhelming amount of solid evidence already collected is more than conclusive.
Pre-eminent experts have presented overwhelmingly compelling evidence to support the conclusion that life is a result of evolution by natural selection.
If, as creationists like to claim, evolution is not so, what exactly is the process of creation and what evidence is there to support it?
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments