Across social conservative spheres, the denial of women's reproductive rights has become a hot-button issue. Many want judges to rule in favor of pro-life positions with the intended goal of overturning Roe v Wade so that abortion can be made illegal. However, I would suggest that not only is this completely misguided, but fundamentally inconsequential.
Why? Because turns out if women want to get abortions, there is no real way to stop that from happening.
You might think of these as being "back alley" abortions, but in practice it would look something more like Women of the Waves, a non-profit NGO that provides women's reproductive health services to countries that have restrictive abortion laws.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women_on_WavesEven if you get what you want, you will not have achieved your end goal, and since the support for abortion is a majority opinion and there will always be other avenues for those to get what they want. Trying to press your minority views on the public is a waste of time and resources, besides bringing with it a heavy social and political baggage.
At some point in the distant past, the universe went through a phase of cosmic inflation,
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments