In the world we live in we lack the technology to achieve 0 cabon emissions.
Democrates claim it is is achievable and do everything they can to block the USA's ability to not produce our own source of carbon fuels. Which will leaves us reliant on foreign sources for the carbon fuels that will still be needed.
Some environmentalist claim it is achievable while through bioenergy plants and biofuels which erode our plant of it's natural reasources and are not as easily replaced. These sources cause far more damage to the planet.
Corporations claim they will achieve 0 carbon emissions while the maufacturing of the equipment and the materials they use creates carbon emissions.
Vehicle manufactures claim electric cars are carbon emmision free. While in the production of the vehicles ithey require carbon fuels to build them.
Solar and wind which are questionable in their ability to deliver a constant flow of power also depend on carbon fuels to produce. There are also some environmental damages they create.
So if they start placing a penalty tax on the use of carbon fuels will it not increase the cost of all of these supposed renewable carbon free alternative.
So what is the answer?
Persuade me that I am wrong.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments