Should States Have More Rights? - The Best Online Debate Website | DebateIsland.com - Debate Anything The Best Online Debate Website | DebateIsland.com
frame

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally by activity where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.


Communities

DebateIsland Referral Program: Get a Free Month of DebateIsland Diamond Premium Membership ($4.99 Value) Per Each New User That You Refer!

Should States Have More Rights?

Debate Information

We are witnessing George Orwell's novel Nineteen Eighty Four.

"Totalitarianism is one of the major themes of the novel, 1984. It presents the type of government where even the head of the government is unknown to the public. This theme serves as a warning to the people because such regime unleashes propaganda to make people believe in the lies presented by the government."

We are witnessing a Leftwing media, in bed with a Leftwing Democrat Party, Leftwing Corporations, Leftwing Hollywood,  Leftwing Professional Sports, all pushing Leftwing propoganda through every medium. It is mind control at it's worse. We are witnessing a radical Leftwing Cult, indoctrinating all people to their radical political correct authoritarian doctrine. If you do not conform, you will be forced out of business.

There is no room for dissenting opinions. No room for diversity of thought. You MUST CONFORM!

State's no longer have the right to govern as their people choose. Every State, every Public school, MUST CONFORM to a big Leftwing Federal colletive. If you refuse, you will be sued, you will be boycotted, you will be denied sponserships, you will be denied Sporting events, you will be forced to capitulate or go bankrupt.

We actually have many on this site who are ok with this radical authoritarian takeover.

It's time for every American, who loves freedom, to speak out and stop supporting these radicals through our elections and through the purchasing of their products.
PlaffelvohfenCYDdhartaxlJ_dolphin_473SkepticalOneAlofRI



Debra AI Prediction

Predicted To Win
Predicted To Win
Tie

Details +



Arguments



Post Argument Now Debate Details +

    Arguments


  • Happy_KillbotHappy_Killbot 4759 Pts   -  
    @We_are_accountable ;
    "Totalitarianism is one of the major themes of the novel, 1984. It presents the type of government where even the head of the government is unknown to the public. This theme serves as a warning to the people because such regime unleashes propaganda to make people believe in the lies presented by the government."
    Aka, FOX news
    We are witnessing a Leftwing media, in bed with a Leftwing Democrat Party, Leftwing Corporations, Leftwing Hollywood,  Leftwing Professional Sports, all pushing Leftwing propoganda through every medium. It is mind control at it's worse. We are witnessing a radical Leftwing Cult, indoctrinating all people to their radical political correct authoritarian doctrine. If you do not conform, you will be forced out of business.
    We are witnessing a Rightwing media, in bed with a Rightwing Republican Party, Rightwing Corporations, Rightwing Hollywood,  Rightwing Professional Sports, all pushing Rightwing propoganda through every medium. It is mind control at it's worse. We are witnessing a radical Rightwing Cult, indoctrinating all people to their radical political correct authoritarian doctrine. If you do not conform, you will be forced out of business.
    There is no room for dissenting opinions. No room for diversity of thought. You MUST CONFORM!
    In the right-wing, no one has a dissenting opinion because they can't think of any.
    State's no longer have the right to govern as their people choose. Every State, every Public school, MUST CONFORM to a big Leftwing Federal colletive. If you refuse, you will be sued, you will be boycotted, you will be denied sponserships, you will be denied Sporting events, you will be forced to capitulate or go bankrupt.
    Because expecting any kind of educational or corporate standard is unacceptable. /s
    We actually have many on this site who are ok with this radical authoritarian takeover.
    Says the authoritarian who has no idea he supports authoritarianism, and most likely can't even define it.
    It's time for every American, who loves freedom, to speak out and stop supporting these radicals through our elections and through the purchasing of their products.
    The best way to do that is to vote blue.
    PlaffelvohfenCYDdhartaDebater123xlJ_dolphin_473We_are_accountableSkepticalOneAlofRI
    At some point in the distant past, the universe went through a phase of cosmic inflation,
    Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
    Through a long process of evolution this life 
    developed into the human race.
    Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .

    All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  • NomenclatureNomenclature 569 Pts   -  
    @We_are_accountable
    The authoritarian Left says

    I truly do not understand how you can call the left authoritarian after your own leader just tried to throw out the results of a democratic election.

    What is actually wrong with you?

    CYDdhartaDebater123xlJ_dolphin_473We_are_accountableAlofRI
  • NomenclatureNomenclature 569 Pts   -  
    @We_are_accountable
    We are witnessing George Orwell's novel Nineteen Eighty Four.

    Orwell was ON the left.

    My dear God you guys have gone mad.

    We_are_accountableAlofRIDebater123LiamThePersonPlaffelvohfen
  • anarchist100anarchist100 447 Pts   -   edited April 7
    @Nomenclature
    To be fair Joe Biden is said they should think about mandating vaccines, he also signed the patriot act.
    We_are_accountable
  • NomenclatureNomenclature 569 Pts   -   edited April 7
    @anarchist100
    To be fair Joe Biden is said they should think about mandating vaccines, he also signed the patriot act.

    Mandating vaccines would be done to keep people alive. I'm curious what you think is authoritarian about not letting vast numbers of people die horrible, completely unnecessary deaths. In a country where half the population weren't ignorant, there would be no need to mandate people to take something which is going to save their lives.

    George W Bush introduced the Patriot Act. It had nothing to do with Joe Biden. As you know full well, George W Bush and his entire administration lied to everybody about 9/11 and the bill he was pushing through. That would make Joe Biden a victim of lies coming from the right.

    In fact, all the right wing does or has done for the last two decades, is tell lies. These lies have become so ridiculous that they are literally becoming worse than the Nazis. See:-

    After the 2020 United States presidential election in which Joe Biden prevailed,[4] then-incumbent Donald Trump, as well as his campaign and his proxies, pursued an aggressive, unprecedented[5] effort to deny and overturn the election.[6][7][8] The attempts to overturn the election have been described as an attempted coup d'état[9] and an implementation of "the big lie."[10]

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attempts_to_overturn_the_2020_United_States_presidential_election


    CYDdhartaWe_are_accountableAlofRI
  • anarchist100anarchist100 447 Pts   -   edited April 7
    @Nomenclature
    1: If vaccines are so safe why did congress pass the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, in 1986?
    2: In Which Joe Biden Brags About Having Written the Patriot Act - Antiwar.com Blog
    Debater123We_are_accountable
  • We_are_accountableWe_are_accountable 1116 Pts   -  
    @anarchist100

    You are correct. People on the Left always have some excuse why they have the right to tell us how to live. They always say "it's for our own good".

    Freedom means we have the right to take risks. We can do dangerous things such as climb mountains, and all manners of dangerous activities.

    We have the common sense to not take risks if worried about safety. If we are afraid of getting Covid, we will not go to that baseball game in Texas.
    If we are an elderly person with underlying conditions, we will stay away from any family member who may have gone to the game.
    This is not rocket science. The authoritarian Left is using Covid to open the door to their radical Government control of the people.

    Can you even imagine MLB and corporations telling Georgia how they must carry out their elections? Ask yourself why they would care.
    As always, it's about politics. Money and power. The Democrat Party will pass future laws that benefit the MLB and Leftwing Corporations!

    What's so amazing with these hypocritical Corporations is that theu have no problem doing business with Communist China, even though this nation is carrying out ethnic cleansing.

    So I get it, they will boycott Georgia for wanting voter ID, WHICH MOST AMERICANS WANT, but having no problem doing business with CHINA!
    Plaffelvohfenanarchist100AlofRI
  • @We_are_accountable
    Freedom means we have the right to take risks. We can do dangerous things such as climb mountains, and all manners of dangerous activities.
    What freedom means is we have a right to perform without cost. We have the liberty to take a risk, the metal basic precedent held in America is safety is a declaration of Independence. In order to form a more perfect union can be applied to the independence of safety.

    As far as voting goes what does that mean in the creation of consitutional rights and the legal precedent of voting in the past? How do we form the more perfect union between the governing of the ability to vote and the original requirements that a male must own land to vote? For the sake of discussion, it would fare to ask that we presume that a landowner also had the burden of defending the lands of others as if it was his own. Often the service was in combat if necessary.
  • AlofRIAlofRI 1361 Pts   -  
    We have seen what "states rights" does when it is, well, "abandoned" by the federal government and left on its own. Capitalists take advantage of them. $5000 ventilators become $40,000 units. The states have the "right" to bid on them ... or let their people die. Masks become items for the more wealthy states and those that want to protect their people from neighboring states that don't, shouldn't .... because it's bad for business! States rights MUST be cooperative and the only way that can happen is with a federal government .... of state representatives ... deciding on agreements between the states. That's what makes U.S. the UNITED STATES! (What we USED TO BE!) Trumplicans and far right (are there any who are NOT?), politicians want states to compete against each other to weaken the unity ... divide and conquer! Moscow Mitch, Commie Cruz, Gulag Graham want a totalitarian government ... ONE PARTY ... control ... just like Russia.

    The founders wanted a democratic system WITH state rights under a UNITED agreement! Every state going their own way is NOT United ...States. State's rights must, at least, follow federal acceptance and be Constitutional ... be "united".
    PlaffelvohfenWe_are_accountableCYDdhartaDebater123
  • We_are_accountableWe_are_accountable 1116 Pts   -   edited April 8
    @AlofRI

    Tanslation, if Federal congressional Repubicans try to meddle in State election laws, IT'S RACIST RACIST RACIST, but when Democrats do it, it's a good thing.

    GET OFF DEBATE SITES, you embarrass yourself.
    AlofRIPlaffelvohfen
  • @AlofRI
     $5000 ventilators become $40,000
    When you need to expedite the production let's just say because we can make 10,000 + or- units a year for $5,000.00 does not mean you can turn around and make 100,000 units a day for $5,000.00 the costs of manufacturing is directly related to turn around time labor alone can drive a cost up 4x. With labor, you are not talking about just one manufacturing plant either production requires the advanced purpose of supplies as well.

    In my lifetime cloth sterilized masks had been the medical masks used by doctors.
    AlofRI
  • Again congress and the exsecutive office both had been involved in the ebola issue during the preceding years. What's the point?
  • AlofRIAlofRI 1361 Pts   -  
    @AlofRI

    Tanslation, if Federal congressional Repubicans try to meddle in State election laws, IT'S RACIST RACIST RACIST, but when Democrats do it, it's a good thing.

    GET OFF DEBATE SITES, you embarrass yourself.
    Says the person with over 5000 fallacy responses!  :joy:
    NomenclatureCYDdhartaWe_are_accountableDebater123Plaffelvohfen
  • NomenclatureNomenclature 569 Pts   -  
    @anarchist100
     If vaccines are so safe why did congress pass the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, in 1986?

    Vaccines are a lot safer than catching Covid you lamentably ignorant, tinfoil warrior.

     In Which Joe Biden Brags About Having Written the Patriot Act - Antiwar.com Blog

    The author of this is Matt Purple, a senior editor at The American Conservative. You have -- seemingly quite deliberately -- hidden the source of the article (The American Conservative), and linked a duplicate copy hosted on a left wing anti-war website, in order to try to hide the fact that this is a politically biased opinion piece written by a diehard Conservative. You personify the average American Conservative shockingly well: dishonest, biased and institutionally corrupt.

    Joe Biden wrote a bill called the The Omnibus Counterterrorism Act in 1995, not the Patriot Act, which was written in 2001.  See:-

    Meanwhile, Republican Senator Orrin Hatch, along with Democratic Senators Patrick Leahy (D-VT) and Arlen Specter (R-PA), had been working with John Ashcroft on a draft bill, called the Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001. On September 19, 2001, this first draft is introduced to Congress. Many of the most controversial aspects of the USA PATRIOT Act were first part of this draft and it was later to be introduced as the PATRIOT Act/USA Act — which in turn became the basis for the final USA PATRIOT Act. 

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_the_Patriot_Act

    We_are_accountableAlofRI
  • Cringe_TrainCringe_Train 209 Pts   -  
    @We_are_accountable

    Do you blame everything that makes you upset on the left?

    Happy_KillbotNomenclatureWe_are_accountablePlaffelvohfenAlofRI
  • anarchist100anarchist100 447 Pts   -   edited April 8
    @Nomenclature
    1: The National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, makes it so that you can not sue a vaccine producer for an injury that is a result of a vaccine. Without the prospect of being sued what obligation do they have to ensure safety?
    2: "Right after 1994, and you can ask the attorney general this, because I got a call when he introduced the patriot act, he said Joe I'm introducing the act basically as you wrote it, in 1994, it was defeated then not by any liberals, it was defeated then by the folks who worried that we'd have the minutemen would get in trouble, by the Mr. Bars of the world, who were worried about the right wing, not anything else. this has nothing to do with you all', but just to set the record strait, almost the same thing that got passed the patriot act was introduced by me in 1994 and it was the right wing and it was the right wing that defeated it, you guys tried to help get is passed including um the wiretap changes and the rest". -Joe Biden
    Also I'm not a conservative, not supporting Joe Biden doesn't make me a conservative.
    We_are_accountable
  • We_are_accountableWe_are_accountable 1116 Pts   -  
    @Cringe_Train

    I give you facts to the things that should bother everyone about the Left. You can never refute my facts because you know it's true. All you ever do is whataboutism, which proves nothing.
    AlofRI
  • Cringe_TrainCringe_Train 209 Pts   -  
    @Cringe_Train

    I give you facts to the things that should bother everyone about the Left. You can never refute my facts because you know it's true. All you ever do is whataboutism, which proves nothing.
    interestingly, i actually know it's NOT true. You see my dad's pretty high up in Cisco. upper management position. and he's never told me anything about this. So i asked him, and i've never seen my father look more confused and amused at the same time.
    NomenclatureDeeWe_are_accountablePlaffelvohfenAlofRI
  • NomenclatureNomenclature 569 Pts   -   edited April 15
    @We_are_accountable
    I give you facts to the things that should bother everyone about the Left. 
    Don't make me laugh. You wouldn't know a fact from a bowl of rice pudding. You're a brazen far right partisan nitwit who comes here to turn reality upside down. 

    You smear the left with words like "authoritarian" when less than 6 months ago your Fuhrer tried to literally overturn the results of a democratic election and retain power through force. It's so bizarre it's actually surreal.
    DeeWe_are_accountablePlaffelvohfenDebater123AlofRICYDdharta
  • We_are_accountableWe_are_accountable 1116 Pts   -  
    @Cringe_Train

    Unless your dad lives in some kind of bubble, he knows exactly what I am talking about. It's all over the news where corporations and MLB are climbing into politics and telling States how they must run their elections, or be punished!.

    https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-georgia-voting-companies/factbox-companies-speak-out-against-georgia-voting-restrictions-idUSL4N2LU38E


    Here is the tweet from Cisco's CEO...

    "Cisco CEO Chuck Robbins shared his concern for the new law in a tweet. “Our vote is our voice, and everyone deserves the opportunity to be heard. Governments should be working to make it easier to vote, not harder. Ensuring equal #VotingRights isn’t a political issue, it’s an issue of right and wrong,” he said."

    The sickest part of all this Big Brother corruption is that these election laws are not preventing anyone from voting. IT'S ALL LEFTWING LIES AND DISTORTIONS. They want to make permanent their unlawful changes to our mail in ballot election rules.
    Cringe_Train
  • We_are_accountableWe_are_accountable 1116 Pts   -  
    @Nomenclature

    LIAR... IGNORE
    PlaffelvohfenDebater123AlofRI
  • NomenclatureNomenclature 569 Pts   -  
    @We_are_accountable
    LIAR... IGNORE

    Great counter-argument my brother. You really cut my reasoning to pieces there.

    Plaffelvohfen
  • Debater123Debater123 500 Pts   -  
    @Nomenclature Two things:
    A. Trump didn't cause the January 6th riot, he in fact encouraged the protesters to peacefully protest, would a person who is trying to start an insurrection really say that?

    B. You call him a Fuehrer? I would call him the opposite, he is the best President of Isreal, the only Jewish State, would a Nazi be so friendly to Jews? I doubt it... Not only that, Trump is far from a socialist by any means and is often outspoken against it, he is also very much not an authoritarian, he's on the liberal side of the spectrum. Not only that, Trump is far from expansionist, and hardly seeks to expand the US's borders through conquest to gain glory for the nation.
    NomenclatureAlofRIWe_are_accountableCYDdharta
  • NomenclatureNomenclature 569 Pts   -  
    @Debater123
    Trump didn't cause the January 6th riot

    Ahahahaha! He literally told his supporters to go to the Capitol building and start a fight. He'd have been impeached for it if any of the Republicans had a spine or a hair's worth of honesty between them. 

    He clearly caused the riot and you are delusional. He'd just spent the last two months trying to have the election result thrown out and had been laughed out of court by close to 60 different judges. It was the last resort of a desperate authoritarian. He figured if he couldn't get what he wanted by abusing the law, he'd simply make up his own law.

    I feel that you are simply too delusional to even have a conversation with.

    Debater123AlofRIWe_are_accountableCYDdharta
  • NomenclatureNomenclature 569 Pts   -   edited April 16
    @Debater123
    You call him a Fuehrer? 

    He literally tried to overthrow the results of a fair democratic election and retain power by force. 

    Listen pal, you are a fanatic. Trump could turn up to work tomorrow with a swastika tattooed on his face and you would STILL feign surprise at the thought of him being a fascist.

    Debater123AlofRIWe_are_accountableCYDdharta
  • Debater123Debater123 500 Pts   -   edited April 16
    @Nomenclature
    1: He didn't say anything of the sort, that would contradict his whole message of peaceful protest.
    https://www.wsj.com/video/trump-full-speech-at-dc-rally-on-jan-6/E4E7BBBF-23B1-4401-ADCE-7D4432D07030.html You can watch the full speech here, please tell me where he told people to start rioting at the capitol.
    Ironically enough I've found you to be just as deluded, you cannot even argue, you just throw insults and attack only very selective parts of the argument, but you fail there as well.

    2: And you are not a fanatic? You are infinitely more fanatical than me, at the very least I do not ignore people's arguments and the facts, as seen in many of our debates, specifically the one about gun control, where if I do say so myself, wiped the floor.

    If Trump came to work with a swastica, he would be a Nazi, but why would he have a swastica? He has Jewish children and is the best President to Jews of all time, with perhaps the exception of Harry Truman.
    NomenclaturePlaffelvohfenAlofRIWe_are_accountableCYDdharta
  • NomenclatureNomenclature 569 Pts   -  
    @Debater123
    He didn't say anything of the sort

    Yes he did you delusional fanatic:-

    Trump urged his supporters to ‘fight much harder’ against ‘bad people’ and ‘show strength’ at the Capitol.

    "You’ll never take back our country with weakness. You have to show strength. When you catch somebody in a fraud, you are allowed to go by very different rules."

    https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/10/us/trump-speech-riot.html

    You are just simply not a well person. The house voted unanimously to impeach him for what you claim he didn't do, so your denials are as pointless as they are offensive.
    PlaffelvohfenDebater123AlofRIWe_are_accountableCYDdharta
  • Debater123Debater123 500 Pts   -   edited April 16
    @Nomenclature
    By showing strength he meant standing up against what he called fraud and a rigged election, that doesn't mean violence, in fact, many times during the speech he was against violence and urged his supporters to peaceful protest.

    Also, please address my argument and full, stop resorting to selective argumentation fallacies, ad hominem, and cherrypicking, and above all else, ignoring the facts.

    The house also didn't vote unanimously, hardly so, it was very partisan, 232-197 was the vote.
    NomenclatureAlofRIPlaffelvohfenWe_are_accountableCYDdharta
  • NomenclatureNomenclature 569 Pts   -  
    @Debater123
    By showing strength he meant 

    Ahahahaha! THOUSANDS of people stormed the Capitol building you clown. Funny how they all got the "wrong" idea about what he meant.

    I find it extremely difficult to take anything you say seriously. You are one of these political extremists who will gladly deny the nose on his own face.

    Also, please address my argument

    I haven't seen you make any argument. I've just seen you lay down a bunch of false excuses and justifications for 1930s fascism. Your fuhrer literally tried to throw out democracy in exactly the same way that Hitler did, so your credibility here is zero.

    AlofRIDebater123PlaffelvohfenWe_are_accountableCYDdharta
  • Debater123Debater123 500 Pts   -  
    @Nomenclature
    1: They didn't storm because of him, I believe they stormed because of the whole atmosphere, and that I believe that they felt it was the boiling point.
    Seriously, you are far more of a political extremist than me.

    2: Then you must have not read what I said, excuse me, but when have I defended Fascism? I am very much against it, which would be expected because Fascism has bred the Nazis, and the Nazis are the most anti-Semitic group ever.
    PlaffelvohfenWe_are_accountableCYDdharta
  • NomenclatureNomenclature 569 Pts   -   edited April 16
    @Debater123
    They didn't storm because of him

    Spare me your delusional, repetitive lies please.

    Then you must have not read what I said, excuse me, but when have I defended Fascism?

    I read what you wrote precisely. You are attempting to defend a man who slept with a book of Adolf Hitler speeches in his bedside cabinet. Your faux surprise at being labelled a fascist is born either of ignorance or of dishonesty. Either way your company is unwanted.

    Trump's Ex-Wife Says He Kept Hitler's Book of Speeches by his bedside.

    https://www.thequint.com/news/world/trumps-ex-wife-says-he-kept-hitlers-book-of-speeches-by-bedside

    Donald Trump using Adolf Hitler's 'Mein Kampf' playbook, says world expert on Nazi leader

    http://https//www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/adolf-hitler-donald-trump-mein-kampf-bluffed-way-power-nazi-leader-germany-fuhrer-us-president-election-ron-rosenbaum-a7568506.html

    Of course, you know better than the world expert, because that's what they teach you guys on the American far right. They teach you how to vigorously defend a bunch of insane garbage.
    PlaffelvohfenDebater123We_are_accountableCYDdharta
  • AlofRIAlofRI 1361 Pts   -  
    Leaders of the "proud boys", the "oath keepers", QAnon, etc. have been identified and were beating on "blue lives matter" people. No black lives matter or antifa folks would take their lives into their hands and show up with those friendly-type right-wingers ... especially when they brought their own "friendly-type gallows"! 

    I'd be careful who you back here, now that the FBI and Justice Dept. are not being blocked by Rump's personal AG the truth will be coming out. You might want to think just how unintelligent you might look when all is said and done. I expect the anointed ones may be on the inside looking out by 2022. ;-)
    PlaffelvohfenWe_are_accountableCYDdharta
  • Debater123Debater123 500 Pts   -   edited April 16
    @Nomenclature
    1: Saying what I said was a lie isn't a valid argument or retort.

    2: He actually denied reading Hitler's speeches, and he said he would never read it, I don't trust what the wife says because at the time they were separated, so that would mean relations were sour between the two, and she could just lie. Not only that, Trump actually mistook the book he was given for Mien Kumpf, meaning he never paid much attention to it. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-hitler-mein-kampf/

    3: The expert asserted it because the expert claimed he was similar to Hitler in the way that he lies a lot and that he changes his personality to 'bluff'. Even if this were true, it doesn't make him a Nazi by any margin. As that would mine all liars and manipulators are Nazis and are taking tips from Mein Kumpf. Furthermore, he is nearly the complete opposite of the Nazi Ideology, he is anti-racism, anti-socialist, anti-imperialist, a moderate interventionalist, and a Pro-Semitic.
    PlaffelvohfenNomenclatureWe_are_accountableCYDdharta
  • NomenclatureNomenclature 569 Pts   -  
    @Debater123
    He actually denied reading Hitler's speeches

    Ahahahaha! Literally, why would you admit that? 

    The expert asserted it because

    Look buddy, you denied that you support fascism. The expert disagrees with you. End of discussion.

    We_are_accountableCYDdhartaDebater123
  • Debater123Debater123 500 Pts   -   edited April 16
    @Nomenclature
    1: I'm quite sure any Nazi would admit that they have read Hitler's speechs.

    2: When did the expert assert that I supported Fascism? The expert didn't even call Trump a Fascist.

    Also, please respond to my argument in full, not just in little snippets.
    NomenclatureWe_are_accountableCYDdharta
  • NomenclatureNomenclature 569 Pts   -   edited April 16
    @Debater123
    I'm quite sure any Nazi would admit that they have read Hitler's speechs

    Why don't you explain more about what a good plan it is to openly associate yourself with Adolf Hitler during a presidential campaign? That's what you would have done to win votes is it? Admit that you read Hitler speeches?

    You are intellectually dishonest to the point of sheer absurdity. 

    We_are_accountableCYDdhartaDeeDebater123
  • We_are_accountableWe_are_accountable 1116 Pts   -  
    @Debater123

    You once again speak the truth, but these Leftists deny it. I will not waste my time debating these fake liars.
    NomenclatureDebater123
  • exconexcon 67 Pts   -   edited April 17
    @We_are_accountable

    Should states have more rights?
    Hello From:

    Your first misunderstanding is that states HAVE rights..  They DON'T.  They have POWERS..  PEOPLE have rights.  Nonetheless, your question has merit..  And, the Constitution dealt with it in the 10th Amendment..  I know you don't like me quoting the Constitution, but here goes: 

    "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it, are reserved to the States respectively....."

    In other words, the states have ALL the powers the Constitution left out.  What's wrong with ALL??

    excon
  • CYDdhartaCYDdharta 1494 Pts   -  
    AlofRI said:
    Leaders of the "proud boys", the "oath keepers", QAnon, etc. have been identified and were beating on "blue lives matter" people. No black lives matter or antifa folks would take their lives into their hands and show up with those friendly-type right-wingers ... especially when they brought their own "friendly-type gallows"! 


    Really?!?  A BLM, Inc. activist was the first person charged.

    Black Lives Matter activist charged for participation in storming of Capitol
  • Debater123Debater123 500 Pts   -  
    @Nomenclature He wasn't even running for president at the time of this interview, which was in 1990. 

    You have also thus far not given any evidence to prove that he has actually read it, despite the fact he denied reading it.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Back To Top

DebateIsland.com

| The Best Online Debate Experience!
© 2021 DebateIsland.com, all rights reserved. DebateIsland.com | The Best Online Debate Experience! Debate topics you care about in a friendly and fun way. Come try us out now. We are totally free!

Contact us

customerservice@debateisland.com
Terms of Service

Get In Touch