The Gay Wedding Cake Principle

CYDdharta

Blastcat said:

@CYDdharta

CYDdharta said:

@aarong; You really need to do something about  @Swolliw 's spamming.

you have sent this exact same message three times.. so, Ironically, this is spam.
@Swolliw  has taken the trouble to create a topic of debate.

All you seem to do is try to put him down.

So, I've your hateful spam to the moderators ...

its sad that you cant contribute.
Its even sadder that you take the trouble to attack someone.

Since this spam is completely irrelevant to the actual debate topic, I tagged your comment "Irrelevant", but I could have tagged it "Fallacy".
Too bad i can't use both.

Swolliw isn't here to debate, he's a man on a crusade.  His only purpose is to denigrate people of faith.  Swolliw could put all 687 of his religion threads into a single thread and not go off-topic. That wouldn't bother me at all.  Instead he chooses to spam the board with his garbage.  I will continue to draw attention to Swolliw's spamming as long as he feels the need to continue spamming this site.

John_C_87

The wedding cake is a piece of art. In constitutional translation, the cost is directly proportional to the art. Had this precedent not been set a court would be legally free without cost to dictate counterfeiting by lack of common defense to the general welfare of all.

I am sure a person can find a wedding cake knock-off. A person can also commit a crime by lawsuit forcing a witness to give false testimony on an official event. We can go on for days how the legal process has not provided representation or common defense to the general welfare for years about this topic. To keep the state of the union in basic principle however Binvir's and unosmulier's are not Wedding's and are verbally legally binding as a witnessed event. 

It's not against the law to be a  _ick and a  _sshole at the same time, but it should be,

John_C_87

Irrelevance from someone who does not understand. How relevant to a legal precedent of a public partnership witnessed between those of the same gender.

Swolliw

@John_C_87

I am sure a person can find a wedding cake knock-off.

And I'm sure that the price of pork is a major issue, however, that has nothing to do with the topic.

Now, how about a man of your great knowledge and understanding explain why it seems to be that Christians adhere to what is written in the Bible, but only those parts of the Bible that they happen to cherry-pick.

Blastcat

Swolliw said:

@John_C_87

I am sure a person can find a wedding cake knock-off.

And I'm sure that the price of pork is a major issue, however, that has nothing to do with the topic.

Now, how about a man of your great knowledge and understanding explain why it seems to be that Christians adhere to what is written in the Bible, but only those parts of the Bible that they happen to cherry-pick.

One has to cherry pick from the bible. Lets say one has a moral issue. One cannot be expected to read the entire bible in order to find out the appropriate passage. One has to pick and choose from a few ... With the internet, I fully expect christians will become more moral, since their search is more automated than it used to be when they were just books.

Google it.
Says I can eat the pork as long as I pray for repentance after.
Same with the gay sex.

One thing though, make sure you aren't going to die before you have the time to repent, repent, repent of your evil ways. Maybe repent while youre doing the nasty?

Swolliw

@Blastcat

Says I can eat the pork as long as I pray for repentance after. 

It's just that there are some people who refuse to have anything to do with pork and vilify anyone else who would dare go near a bacon sandwich. The irony is that they are bigoted pigs themselves but "oh no, it's not me, the Bible just happens to say that". 

Boar's ar-se.

Blastcat

Swolliw said:

@Blastcat

Says I can eat the pork as long as I pray for repentance after. 

It's just that there are some people who refuse to have anything to do with pork and vilify anyone else who would dare go near a bacon sandwich. The irony is that they are bigoted pigs themselves but "oh no, it's not me, the Bible just happens to say that". 

Boar's ar-se.

a true bacon sandwich is bacon inside of two bacon slices.
In other words, bacon, bacon, and bacon. Or just bacon.

John_C_87

Swolliw said:

@John_C_87

I am sure a person can find a wedding cake knock-off.

And I'm sure that the price of pork is a major issue, however, that has nothing to do with the topic.

Now, how about a man of your great knowledge and understanding explain why it seems to be that Christians adhere to what is written in the Bible, but only those parts of the Bible that they happen to cherry-pick.

The Bible is significantly cheap in price and quality of law books.

The Gay Wedding Cake Principle

It has everything to do with the topic title. A gay wedding is an assistance that the witness takes part in an event it might not want to see. The representation does not fit a biased view set by religion in that they do not require the observation of the act of creating a citizen by the union which is documented by the official ceremony. Why this would be argued as legal malpractice is that civil litigation is holding the courts responsible for the tampering of a public witness.

Try and bankrupt a city much?