Preamble to the argument:
Kirk Hartle was shocked that his dead wife was able to vote in the 2020 election, making it seem more likely that there might have been massive voter fraud. Kirk just pleaded guilty to voter fraud. He was sentenced for a year's probation and a $2000 fine for voting twice using his dead wife's name. The judge said " Ultimately, it seems to be to me that it was a cheap political stunt that kinda backfired and showed that our political system actually works because you were ultimately caught. "
________________
The argument:
P1: There has been many claims that the 2020 election suffered from massive voter fraud and Mr. Hartle, and the Republicans in Nevada made a huge deal out of this case. The idea being that if there is one instance of voter fraud, there might be many more. Who knows, right? Let's have many audits, just in case.
P2: It turns out that Hartle becomes the poster boy for voter fraud, got caught, proving that the system works to detect actual voter fraud. It turns out that this instance was a flat out lie.
P3 ( C ) : Therefore, claims of massive voter fraud have not been proved by this stunt, and in fact, backfires in that it proves that instances of voter fraud do get caught in the mighty state of Nevada. And it also proves that some republicans will stoop to lying to have their way. How many? Who knows, right?
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments