It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Head of DHS' Disinformation Governance Board discusses her resignation
Nina Jankowicz, the head of the Disinformation Governance Board at the Department of Homeland Security, has resigned. This comes after Homeland Security Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas paused the program amid criticism from Republicans. Jankowicz joins Jamie Yuccas on CBS News to discuss her decision to step down from the...
There are a lot of things that happen that you can see or touch or explain, what does science think about that.
One presumes that you missed out the negation on the word "can".
This is a very old throwaway question from creationists which I thought had died out eons ago yet ironically exposes the sheer ignorance and shallow minds of such people. You can't see radio waves or wind but they are easily detected. Everything can be and has been explained quite clearly and factually. For example, supernatural phenomena such as ghosts and God are easily explained by the condition commonly known as delusion.
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 25%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.44  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 79%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 46%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 60%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 61%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.16  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 29%  
  Learn More About Debra
So "how do we explain the unexplainable"? We should all (believers included) be honest enough to say that we all don't know. But I know that the pride and fear of believers won't allow for that sort of honesty most of the time, but as for me a nonbeliever, I'm completely comfortable saying "Well the evidence points here, but ultimately I don't know" and that's the most honest, humble answer to those questions.
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 80%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 42%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.04  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 48%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 83%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 44%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.58  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 87%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 30%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 35%  
  Substantial: 67%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra