How Should We Debate Responsibly?

Well thank you for the peer review made up of a panel of you?!?! 

Now, fair shake of the sauce bottle.....the fact is that making a personal attack is not a valid argument and loses you the argument in any case...that sort of disgusting behavior is just not on.

My refutation of your invalid argument and references was fact, not made up by me but actually taken from the text that you linked, for example the test you quoted had 960 test patients only 336 participated, the rest refused, the test did not include patients who complained above and beyond those who refused....fact.....the test was anecdotal only and is nowhere near conclusive and therefore invalid....I did not make that up.....your link said that. You provided one link that had absolutely nothing to do with chiropractic, another that was an editorial funded by the ACA  and another which was purely speculative and provided no evidence whatsoever.....these were objectively pointed out to you and you made no comment at all....I'm afraid that "If YOU personally have a problem with the data, that's quaint" simply has no credibility, ethics or honesty about it.

Apart from the fact that you have blundered your way into yet another defeat you should learn by it and realise that, by picking the wrong side is argumentative suicide in that you were doomed to lose anyway. A subject such as "What age should we vote" is conjectural and can be won either way. A subject that is clear cut and decided on solid facts such as "The sky is blue" or "Chiropractors are dishonest charlatans"  has only one winning outcome, unless the pro side is an incompetent twit however, in this case you chose to go up against a seasoned, experienced and competent debater......you didn't stand a chance and all the bullying, gaslighting and outright deception in the world will not change that.