Can John_C_87 And Science Coexist?

John_C_87

Some people are big believers in science and empiricism. However, many others prefer the John_C_87 method. If your peers have no idea what you are talking about, then how can they debunk you?
I would require liberty to speack freely to answer this quesiton?

What I can say openly... is don't worry ... I got ya. I'll hold your hand and talk you through the math lab on establishing empirical scientific evidence real soon...okay? lol..........the lab for a teacher would cost less than $10.00 and would not require any more supplies outside of those they already have. I aways felt algebra needed a physical math-lab to be instructed clearly to students.....

Nomenclature

@John_C_87

I'll hold your hand and talk you through the math lab on establishing empirical scientific evidence real soon...okay?

Thanks John. I would like that very much.

John_C_87

@Nomenclature
lol.......
See..........some one needs to always hold your hand don't they?

John_C_87

@Nomenclature

Can you explain why coming up with a scientific method to prove Einstein is wrong with a cap of cost at $10.00 is a bad thing?

Nomenclature

@John_C_87

Can you explain why coming up with a scientific method to prove Einstein is wrong with a cap of cost at $10.00 is a bad thing?

Of course, John. I will happily educate you in this matter.

If one examines neosemioticist textual theory, one is faced with a choice: either reject scientific realism or conclude that derivatives of syntax are used to entrench the resultant metaphysical quandary. Neosemioticist textual theory states that narrative is created by communication. Of course, it could be said that Dahmus implies we have to choose between textual narrative and neoconceptual discourse. Moreover, “Science is elitist,” says Baudrillard; however, according to McElwaine, it is not so much reality that is elitist, but rather the defining characteristic, and some would say the economy, of reality. Sontag uses the term ‘scientific realism’ to denote a self-fulfilling paradox. 

In a sense, if deconstructivist theory holds, we have to choose between subconceptual desituationism and classic materialism. A predominant concept is the concept of neosemioticist truth. An abundance of discourse concerning realism may be discovered. Thus, the characteristic theme of the works of Sontag is not dedeconstructivism, but subdedeconstructivism.

I have to say I am disappointed in your lack of knowledge here. John.

John_C_87

@Nomenclature
Try again please?

John_C_87

Can you explain why coming up with a scientific method to prove Einstein is wrong with a cap of cost at $10.00 is a bad thing?