frame

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.





Should Artificial Intelligence have Civil Rights?

Debate Information

If AI ever became sentient and could think like humans, should they be given some civil rights. If so what kinds. If not then why.
여동희IdeaoftheEndless
«1



Debra AI Prediction

Predicted To Win
Predicted 2nd Place
11%
Margin

Details +




Post Argument Now Debate Details +

    Arguments


  • MayCaesarMayCaesar 5971 Pts   -  
    In my eyes, the moment where the AI becomes self-aware is the moment it gets the exact same rights every other intelligent being does. Before that, it is merely a program, a tool, and should be treated as such.

    I realize that the line between the two may not be very clear, but this is the general approach I would practice.
    piloteerPlaffelvohfenIdeaoftheEndless이준표nohkingmo31213강현빈고석만Debater123
  • KikoKiko 17 Pts   -   edited October 2018
    Uhhh civil rights were made for civilians(humans specifically)and last time I checked the only machine that actually acts like a human is the flurry machine at McDonald's because it's a lazy piece of shìt
    piloteerIdeaoftheEndlessPlaffelvohfen강현빈Debater123JeffreyBlankenshipthegodemperorTreeMan
  • piloteerpiloteer 1577 Pts   -  
    Ouch, "@Kiko that's not very nice at all. I know of many flurry machines, and I find them to be quite nice.
    강현빈TreeMan
  • steffy67248steffy67248 26 Pts   -  
    I honestly have no idea why people are even making artificial intelligence. I understand their use for surgeries and stuff but I feel like artificial intelligence just shows the greed of humans for wanting a "perfect" prototype of what a human should , if that makes sense. If Al does become a reality I do think they deserve rights, not necessarily civil rights but some rights. now I just sound racist, but I still honestly don't get why people are out here making fake people like there already isn't 7 billion out here.
    AmericanFurryBoy김민혁인형공방강현빈고석만TreeMan
  • All AI can do is think. That’s it as of right now. They arent a living being, and the only thing you can do to them is hurt their “feelings”. So, I don’t think that they need/deserve civil rights.
    강현빈김동이
    Not every quote you read on the internet is true- Abraham Lincoln
  • AlexOlandAlexOland 313 Pts   -  
    How will we ever determine if they are sentient or not? AI, at its best, will be a machine that is capable of very complex reasoning. It will probably not demand rights, as this is not in its program. Can we consider the machine sentient because it has the ability to reason?

     What is sentience exactly? How do we determine if something is sentient or not? Or rather, how did we determine that some things must be sentient? At this point you realize that believing in the sentience of others is just a good assumption. There is no way for you to know if the person in front of you exists as a different sentience, you just assume that he should be sentient because he is similar to you in a lot of ways. 

     Similarity is the key here. If scientists make an AI that has a human body and acts humanly, we will feel like that AI is sentient. But if they stick to the complex reasoning type of AI, without a body and emotions, we will feel like they are just machines and not sentient. 

     Well, I feel like you will think that I am avoiding the question. So let me ask a question to finish this up, how do we know that the AI we are programming today are not sentient? Why are all of the questions about AI phrased in such a way that assumes the AI today do not have sentience? The reason is, of course, the one I mentioned above:
    "The AI today are not similar to humans, therefore, they should not be sentient."
    piloteer강현빈김민혁
  • piloteerpiloteer 1577 Pts   -  
    @AlexOland

    You make a good point, but how do you know that AI will not ever gain the capability of emotions? Perhaps in the future it will be decided that it would be beneficial for AI to have emotions, so to better understand the emotional complexities of the task at hand. In that case, they would have all the criteria you speak of for having rights. How can we know for certain that AI will not eventually come to the reasoning that they do deserve rights too?
    김민혁
  • YeshuaBoughtYeshuaBought 669 Pts   -  
    No. Robots are not people.
    piloteer강현빈김민혁Debater123
  • AlexOlandAlexOland 313 Pts   -  
    @piloteer " In that case, they would have all the criteria you speak of for having rights." But I did not have any criteria in my argument. All I said was this: if we build emotional and human-like AIs, people will believe that machines deserve rights. If we build normal AIs without feelings, people will feel like they are just machines. And I supported this by pointing out how we ignore the possibility of sentience in AIs today.

     "How can we know for certain that AI will not eventually come to the reasoning that they do deserve rights too?" well, in order for them to want rights, they need to value their own existence. I really doubt the AIs would value things without having some kind of emotions coded into them. But if we assume that it somehow happened and forget the improbability, AIs demanding rights without it being coded into them would surprise everyone enough to make them believe they are sentient.

     Still, I am not expressing my own opinion about whether AIs should rights. I am just predicting how things would develop under certain conditions. 
    김민혁
  • MayCaesarMayCaesar 5971 Pts   -  
    @AlexOland

    I think that, as our technology evolves and, along with it, our perception of reality, what we see as "living" or "intelligent" beings will also change significantly. Today we might expect the intelligent being to have a body, to exhibit some level of independent thinking, to have personal desires. Perhaps in 100 years a box that talks to us will be seen as just as valid and intelligent as our own organisms, if not more. It is even possible that we will eventually turn into a hive mind species, at which point we will not see intelligent beings as independent organisms, but, rather, will seek to integrate them into our system, making the whole question of "Is this being intelligent?" obsolete.

    The concept of rights in that case also will become somewhat obsolete: hive mind species act as one, and there is only one organism that obviously has all the rights - individual parts of it being about as valid subjects of rights, as my hand is a subject to having its own rights.

    A more "down to Earth" scenario is that eventually the AIs will become an inherent part of our lives, and conversing and interacting with them will be as natural to us as drinking water. At that point AIs will be an essential part of our society, and it should be obvious to us then that they deserve just as many rights as we do. Much like we defeated slavery, recognizing the affected people as inherent members of our society - similarly I can see "liberation of AIs" happening in the foreseeable future, where what was seen yesterday as mere appliances today becomes a new societal subgroup.
    AlexOland
  • AlexOlandAlexOland 313 Pts   -  
    @MayCaesar ;

     Well, your whole argument relies on huge assumptions that do not have any real basis. But even if we do accept those assumptions, this does not answer the main question which is the reason why you originally made assumptions: "Will AI ever be sentient?"

     I agreed to your argument because of this line:
    I think that, as our technology evolves and, along with it, our perception of reality, what we see as "living" or "intelligent" beings will also change significantly.
     This is true. In the (probably) not so near future, we might make important discoveries about what intelligence and sentience is. And this question could be more answerable in the light of this new discovery. 
  • CYDdhartaCYDdharta 1823 Pts   -  
    MayCaesar said:
    @AlexOland

    I think that, as our technology evolves and, along with it, our perception of reality, what we see as "living" or "intelligent" beings will also change significantly. Today we might expect the intelligent being to have a body, to exhibit some level of independent thinking, to have personal desires. Perhaps in 100 years a box that talks to us will be seen as just as valid and intelligent as our own organisms, if not more. It is even possible that we will eventually turn into a hive mind species, at which point we will not see intelligent beings as independent organisms, but, rather, will seek to integrate them into our system, making the whole question of "Is this being intelligent?" obsolete.

    The concept of rights in that case also will become somewhat obsolete: hive mind species act as one, and there is only one organism that obviously has all the rights - individual parts of it being about as valid subjects of rights, as my hand is a subject to having its own rights.

    A more "down to Earth" scenario is that eventually the AIs will become an inherent part of our lives, and conversing and interacting with them will be as natural to us as drinking water. At that point AIs will be an essential part of our society, and it should be obvious to us then that they deserve just as many rights as we do. Much like we defeated slavery, recognizing the affected people as inherent members of our society - similarly I can see "liberation of AIs" happening in the foreseeable future, where what was seen yesterday as mere appliances today becomes a new societal subgroup.

    Considering such an AI could potentially replicate itself at will and/or exist in many places at once, how could we allow it a vote?  How can you determine the state of residence of a program that exists on several machines in different states, or even countries?
    thegodemperor
  • K_MichaelK_Michael 114 Pts   -  
    Until AIs have the thought to ask for civil rights, we shouldn't even consider whether they deserve them. They are only programs, and the only way for them to be sentient is if they had a progressive system that changed from the original programming. This is dangerous, because they might decide that humans (not an entirely inaccurate statement) are the scourge of the Earth and must be eradicated.
    Debater123
    "We're all in the gutter, but some of us are looking at the stars." 
Sign In or Register to comment.

Back To Top

DebateIsland.com

| The Best Online Debate Experience!
© 2023 DebateIsland.com, all rights reserved. DebateIsland.com | The Best Online Debate Experience! Debate topics you care about in a friendly and fun way. Come try us out now. We are totally free!

Contact us

customerservice@debateisland.com
Terms of Service

Get In Touch