Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
Of course my claim is substantiated because a grouping of cells cannot be truly aware of itself or any benefits or consequences incurring upon it until it has a brain to perceive these things.
The problem with your point on fetal autonomy is that, yes, it can grow on its own potentially, but, until it has the capacity to experience itself as well as experience the benefits or consequences of morality, then what can we apply morality to? A basketball can’t experience itself and is not able to register benefit or consequence, so I can’t apply morality to it and thus it doesn’t matter what happens to it. What’s the difference here between a basketball and a currently non-sentient clump of cells?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
The answer is clear if you can’t understand the basic grievance created by self-incrimination. No.
Can I ask how old you are?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Well, to be honest, my issue with discerning your points isn't my age, but the lack of basic grammar in your sentences. Aside from that, since you've stated you're not in favor of abortion, why do you object? How does abortion create self-incrimination?
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: favor of abortion    self-incrimination   lack of basic grammar   issue  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Good judgment may not be due to age ? Are you sure about that? In relationship to admissions of guilt, after described felony crime, self-incrimination takes place when the person admits to making the choice, or Pro-choice.. No, I did not state I am not in favor of abortion. A woman has a constitutional right to describe a murder, then admit to carrying out the crime. I said you are not educated, or maybe just no wise enough to understand the problem of abusing constitutional unions as trust, by exposures to self-incrimination as an entrapment, then allowing the dismissal of presumption to innocence with United State Constitutional right.
Can all woman say they have had a female specific amputation without self-incrimination ?
Can all woman say after the official start of pregnancy the woman made a choice to terminate the pregnancy without self-incrimination?
Good grammar is very important, it may even help when spreading out written admission of guilt out over several sentences. I will keep that in mind thank you.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: self-incrimination    constitutional right   United State Constitutional   dismissal of presumption  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
Well point out the grammar concern directly, rephrase the statement in question to English grammar mistake, you are literally arguing the alibi given to the admission of crime as a women’s choice and you are questioning how abortion is self-incriminating to woman.
By the way in understanding how old you are may help me present the principles in an easier to understand way.  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Forget it, I'll not mention the grammar issue, as that's not helping me. So, is the reason you object to abortion because it implies self-incrimination? If so, are you making a moral case in principle or making a case in terms of U.S. legality?
  Considerate: 82%  
  Substantial: 73%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: moral case    self-incrimination   principle   reason  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 56%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.18  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: statements    nobody   website   claims  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
Preserving united State Constitutional right. The legal argument and the moral argument had already been made; damage done. The logical thing to do at this point is establish a united State constitutional explanation can be made.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
This one here is called "The repetitive United State Constitutional" fallacy.
No, it is not a unsound argument someone is doing what they have been told to do, quote. "You don't like abortion? Don't have one, problem solved..." Female specific amputation is literally NOT pregnancy abortion. Something else has been described other then life the basic principles as topic are danger and immigration.
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.68  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
But, they do know what self-incrimination is? Do they know what an admissions are ?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@대왕광개토
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 44%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Female specific amputation    basic principle   self-amputation   details  
  Relevant (Beta): 43%  
  Learn More About Debra
You failed in creating all woman as equal plaffelvohfen. You failed in preserving united state constitution. Fix the failure or not a union will take place that will create all woman as equal exposing negligence were it may fall.
  Considerate: 73%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.48  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: great concern    woman's united state   control of her criminal intentions   female specific amputations  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
I'm sorry, but I just won't be able to continue a debate with you specifically because I just can't sufficiently derive coherent points from your points due to their immense grammatical errors.
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 42%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: coherent points    debate   immense grammatical errors   points  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
No need to apologize since it is my grammar explaining self-incriminations used incorrectly, realistically though we are not talking English grammar as all goal in principle was to create all woman as equal without the use of criminal accusation to do so. As a trail was expected by this process.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 67%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Female specific amputation    choice   lot   person  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
So then if THIS (Self-awareness) is the standard, then how is someone in a coma any different? A person in a coma cannot experience itself and cannot experience the benefits or consequences of morality. A person in a coma cannot register benefit or consequence so, according to you, you cannot apply morality to a person in a coma and therefor it doesn't matter what happens to "It".
But therein lies the issue, whatever standard you attempt to apply to a fetus, clump of cells, zygote, whatever you wanna call it...when you try to apply it across the board and broadly...it doesn't work. This is because the standards that pro-choice supporters apply to these clumps of cells are illogical and teeming with hypocrisy for the sake of siding with Women on the matter because of the popular consensus that whatever they want must be what's right.
The undisputed fact of the matter is that, in the United States, the proximate cause of 99% of unwanted pregnancies is pure, unadulterated indifference. In the age of information, the age of technology, when more knowledge and data is available to more people that it EVER has been...there seems to be this inexplicable issue of "I just didn't know" and "Oops". The problem here is that those two statements don't really do us any justice. If the truth were forced out of the mouths of these accidental parents it would instead sound something more like "I just didn't give a damn" and "I figured I'd deal with the consequences later because...there's always abortions". THAT'S the true issue here and until we stop making excuses and offering 2nd and 3rd ways out of the consequences for the oldest and most effective way of getting pregnant...we're never going to end the abortion debate.
And to answer your question as to the difference between a basketball and a currently non-sentient clump of cells: A basketball is an inanimate object that possesses no life. The "Currently non-sentient clump of cells" is an autonomously growing life form of the Human species and if left to the natural progression set forth by 99% of the women who become pregnant by choice then it will develop into a fully formed Human infant. This is setting aside the difference that, autonomously speaking, a basketball will never be anything but a basketball.
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stup!d".
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
"So then if THIS (Self-awareness) is the standard, then how is someone in a coma any different?
Someone in a coma is 1) born... 2) already attained full personhood at some point before being comatosed... 3) We can and do, regularly unplug comatose patients with the family approval...
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 71%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 89%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 73%  
  Learn More About Debra
We can and do, regularly unplug comatose patients with the family approval...
We? The Medical practice does not have the patient self-incriminate before the machine assisted possible torture as life support is shut off.
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 63%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.52  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Medical practice    life support   possible torture   comatose patients  
  Relevant (Beta): 58%  
  Learn More About Debra
To your first point, my concern is not whether or not it is human, but rather if it has the conscious capacity to experience the consequences or benefits of morality.
To your coma point, there is still some degree of experience since there is still life, and, aside from this, the person in a coma will still experience the process of being stripped away of life, even in a subconscious state, because the process of becoming dead will actively strip away the subconscious state of being. So, no, this is not comparable so as to produce a contradiction in my line of reasoning.
To your point on standards of fetal development, I’m not sure what you’re trying to state. However, I’ll state my position is not predicated upon that it is currently socially expedient to be pro-choice, but instead as a result of discerning objectivity.
As for your fourth paragraph, this seems mostly irrelevant as it just pertains to the reasons people choose to have abortions, rather than talking about the morality of abortion itself.
I understand the material difference between a basketball and a fetus, but if both don’t have the capacity to experience what happens to them, then where does the moral difference arise?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
You've gone further and done me the favor of explaining that life equals a degree of experience. While I don't necessarily agree, I'll buy your standard and let's go with that. The zygote, clump of cells, fetus is alive by all definitions and therefor possesses a degree of awareness or "Consciousness" as you've stated and can "Experience" the stripping away of life as all living things can.
Lastly, a fetus has just as much capacity to experience the benefits or consequences of morality as someone in a coma does since they both possess life and, according to you, life inherently comes with some degree of experience despite being unconscious.
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stup!d".
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I suppose I'll admit I misspoke a bit. I meant cognitive capacity for experience, not conscious capacity, and the difference here is that while a sentient lifeform may be unconscious, it still has the capacity to experience to some degree and it definitely will experience the process of being stripped of all life since such a process would strip even a lifeform's subconscious self.
To your second paragraph, I didn't say life equals capacity for experience. The standard for life alone is merely that the given matter functions and maintains on its own, especially with the capacity to replicate. So, no, something does not experience just because it is life. It may react, but like a lizard's tail may twitch, this is just a process that is devoid of experience. For a lifeform to experience things, it must necessarily have a cognitive system in order to register itself as well as the things incurring upon it.
To your last point on fetuses, if a fetus has a functional cognitive system, then yes it can experience, but until it has developed such a brain, it cannot experience at all and thus morality cannot be applied to it.
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 98%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: cognitive capacity    sentient lifeform   cognitive system   conscious capacity  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
People in a coma have no ability to consciously feel, speak, hear or move and cannot experience stimuli. Coma patients cannot initiate voluntary actions...similar to your lizard's tail example where tissue can react but not voluntarily. People in a coma show no signs of being aware and therefore are "Devoid of experience".
https://brainfoundation.org.au/disorders/coma/
People in a coma cannot feel pain. This lays to rest your claim that coma patients are incomparable to a fetus because they will inevitably experience the "Stripping of life" . This is flat out wrong, coma patients C A N N O T feel pain, they can't feel A N Y T H I N G.
http://www.healthtalk.org/peoples-experiences/nerves-brain/family-experiences-vegetative-and-minimally-conscious-states/what-coma-and-what-vegetative-state
Even with emerging evidence of new consciousness theories, in your established standard of consciousness and cognitive function...coma patients aren't aware, cannot feel anything and cannot experience morality or the benefits/draw backs of said morality.
Coma patients and Fetuses are both alive but neither have the capacity for cognitive function because neither are aware. Neither can experience anything including moral benefits. In the case of the coma patient having been born...the level of dependency of a coma patient is actually exponentially higher than that of a fetus so I'm not sure how "He's already outside the womb" adds an additional qualifier to the person who has no capacity for cognitive function. Now if we were to move from your point to another point of "Potential" cognitive function then we might have something but then again...fetuses also have the potential for cognitive function as if they're left to their natural state of development...they'll mature into cognitive people.
Lastly,
Yes, you did.
This is you justifying that a degree of experience must exist BECAUSE life is present.
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stup!d".
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
A comatosed individual, at some point crossed at least 2 thresholds to get in that vegetative state. 1) it was born alive, 2) it actively exercised cognitive abilities at some point prior to being comatose, if it never actively exercised cognition then it never was a person... A human born in a vegetative state with no cognitive ability, is not a person, as it is not living, it's alive but will not "live", it would only exist and "existence" is not "life"...
But if at some point, it did fulfill all the requirements for being a person, once those requirement are fulfilled and rights acquired, it's harder (but not impossible) to withdraw rights...
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
Perhaps one in a coma doesn’t feel pain, but they will necessarily experience the process of dying because, as I’ve said before, this process of death will definitely strip them of the minute essence of being they possess in even a coma. A comatose state is still a cognitive state, it’s just not active consciousness, for cognition doesn’t literally disappear into nothingness during a coma since nothingness doesn’t exist to begin with, therefore, something is necessarily still there and will necessarily still be stripped away if killed.
Okay, when did I say that life equals capacity for experience? The truth is that life can exist without the capacity for experience because not all life possesses a cognitive apparatus to register itself and the things incurring upon it. All I’ve said is that morality can only be applied to life once it has cognition, for if it doesn’t, then this grouping of cells or single cellular life is no more or less morally comparable to inert matter.
Lastly, I’m not justifying that experience must exist because life is present. If you actually present my argument correctly, my statement is that life can only experience if it has a cognitive apparatus. Until it has cognition, it is just living matter as opposed to abiotic matter and it has just as much moral worth as abiotic matter.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 56%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: thought pattern    response   outlook   nbsp  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra
Do as you wish, though I'm not sure if Vaulk is going to respond or not, so if he doesn't inquire later down the line, feel free to jump in. Feel free to jump in any time, actually.
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 65%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.52  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: @MichaelElpers    line   Vaulk   time  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Cognition: The mental action or process of acquiring knowledge and understanding through thought, experience, and the senses.
https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/cognition
You C A N N O T acquire knowledge or understanding through thought, experience or the senses while in a coma because you're not conscious. It is medical fact that coma patients are not aware of anything and are unconscious.
Unconscious: Not awake and aware of and responding to one's environment.
https://www.lexico.com/en/definition/unconscious
This almost seems as if you're insistent upon having your own meaning of words...like they only mean what you want them to mean when it's convenient for you.
I'll conclude by saying that, "Words mean things" and while I enjoy the challenge of debate...at this point our debate is starting to feel like hitting a brick wall over and over expecting different results. I wish you the best of luck on your debates in the future.
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stup!d".
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: seriousness Pro-Choice    Pro-life   only logical position   points  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
In addition to our different view on personhood we may also hold different views on the morals of the decision itself. THAT might be something we can debate effectively as I'm of the understanding that the reason for your choice is as impactful as the action itself regarding the morality. For example, giving someone a million dollars is generally seen as charitable behavior and being gracious however, if you gave it away with the intent on seeing it destroy the life of whomever you gave it to...then the act itself has no moral merit. Thus my point regarding the "Why" being just as important as the act.
"There's going to be a special place in Hell for people who spread lies through the veil of logical fallacies disguised as rational argument".
"Oh, you don't like my sarcasm? Well I don't much appreciate your stup!d".
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
The problem is that you do not properly represent my point. Sure, a brain is not actively aware in a comatose state, but the comatose state is indeed still a state because it’s not the same thing as a deceased brain. There is an important differentiation between a brain that is inactive versus one that is dead because the brain that is simply inactive still holds the presence of being a brain, whereas a brain that is dead no longer has this presence because the matter comprising the dead brain is just part of inert nature now. So, while a comatose patient cannot directly and actively experience, their comatose state will be stripped of them in the process of being killed and that still morally qualifies because something at all is still there. So, this brick wall you’re hitting is merely a fictitious one that you’ve conjured one from either misunderstanding me or from actively misconstruing my points out of bad faith.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
What are you talking about here?
"Because if point out the relevance of the united state as a constitutional instituted things become clear about
(the womans choice and the featus of Barak Obama and Donald Trump.")
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 38%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 78%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.48  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Agreed, when it comes down to it, it's a question of belief, right? We each have a belief that we hold for true, regarding personhood and the value of life, correct? And I don't think that we can actually KNOW when personhood begins because personhood (as well as qualitative values) is intrinsically a subjective concept, would you agree with that?
The question then becomes, how do we go forward when 2 opposing subjective value come in conflict?
  Considerate: 96%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: subjective concept    question of belief   value of life   qualitative values  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 68%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.82  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: cluster of cells    Skin cells   abortion   purpose  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 97%  
  Substantial: 6%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 2.92  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Yes, I am stating that a potential equates an actual
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 21%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: potential         
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
This cluster of cells may become a sentient lifeform over time, but until it has a brain, do you recognize that there is nothing that can be morally measured since this non-sentient cluster of cells currently cannot experience the benefits or consequences of morality? As for your claim on differentiation between skin cells and fetal cells, skin cells and non-sentient fetal cells are both morally equivalent as they both are just as aware as inert matter like rocks and water.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Ok, could I ask how you came to this conclusion? It doesn't seem very intuitive...
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 25%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: AmericanFurryBoy Ok    conclusion   nbsp    
  Relevant (Beta): 77%  
  Learn More About Debra
I thought of it????
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 14%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 80%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
Ok, so you would let a surgeon operate on you using a potential scalpel? Can you defend yourself now, with a potential gun? Can you drive a potential car?
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 47%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: AmericanFurryBoy Ok    surgeon   potential scalpel   potential gun  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
Ah, I see your point
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 13%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: point         
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Will you respond to my inquiry?
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 19%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 86%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: inquiry    AmericanFurryBoy      
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
To your first point, yes. Yes I do recognize that “it cant be morally measured since it isn’t capable of morality.” To your second point, no. Skin cells and fetal cells are different types of cells that, depending upon what stage said fetus is in (5-6 weeks), are already aware.
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Skin cells    fetal cells   different types of cells   second point  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Yes, Pregnancy abortion can be morally measured before religion. How it is measured before law and religion are not the same, they are made the same by limiting choice. The age of the object that is officially stopped to end life is not relevant because the target is the official stopping of life by a sinful claim. It is the claim itself that woman tell before god which is immoral. The truth does not appear to matter in religious confessions such as pregnancy abortion before god, only the fact a wrong is of such importance by moral implication that men and woman need to confess their sin to be forgiven.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra