Question for Anti-Science Evolutionists - The Best Online Debate Website | DebateIsland.com The Best Online Debate Website | DebateIsland.com
frame

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!





The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!

Question for Anti-Science Evolutionists
in Science

Is the universe infinitely old, violating the second law of thermodynamics, or did the universe arise by natural means out of nothing, violating the first law of thermodynamics.  You have no third alternative.  If you wish to state there is a third alternative, state your scientific or philosophical credentials.
DrCerealSilverishGoldNovaEmeryPearson



Debra AI Prediction

Predicted To Win
Predicted 2nd Place
56%
Margin

Details +



Arguments

  • Is the universe infinitely old, violating the second law of thermodynamics, or did the universe arise by natural means out of nothing, violating the first law of thermodynamics.  You have no third alternative.  If you wish to state there is a third alternative, state your scientific or philosophical credentials.
    Are you aware of how space-time works? If not I suggest you wiki it for a simple explanation.

    Your argument assumes causality - which under standard conditions is a no-brainer and would be a standard assumption. Unfortunately for your argument, prior to the big bang when space was compressed to a single point, that also means time and hence causality did not exist.

    Although we cannot condense all matter into a single point to test the theory, this is the expected outcome based on Einsteins theory of special relativity and we can test that in more measurable ways to check that it confirms with reality.
    EmeryPearson
  • Time and causality did not exist because the space occupied by the universe was really small?  ROFL. I would ask this dude to prove this, but he has admitted in another thread that he has no way of knowing if he is delusional or not.
    EmeryPearson
  • Atheists despise science and logic.
    DrCerealEmeryPearson
  • You don't seem to be able to offer an argument in response besides your own personal skeptism. Do you have any actual evidence or logic to dismiss space-time - a scientific theory which disproves your claims and is backed up by experimental results?
    EmeryPearson
  • Dude, without proof, your claim needs no argument in response.  We do not argue with the deluded.  We feel sorry for them and confine them.
    EmeryPearson
  • Special Relativity has been proven. as mentioned above, if you are not familiar with the concept the easiest thing for you to do is just wiki it to get a basic understanding as I suggested:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tests_of_special_relativity

    Also if you aren't familiar with a subject, you shouldn't make unsupported claims about it as you'll often be wrong - as evidenced by your claim that there is no proof for special relativity when it is actually something scientists have been finding proof for for over 100 years as described in the links above.
    EmeryPearson
  • ROFL.  Let me help you out.  Prove time and causality cease to exist when matter occupies little space.  ROFL
    EmeryPearson
  • This question always stumps the pretend atheist scientist.
    EmeryPearson
  • I provided you with links explaining the evidence and math supporting the theory. Do you have an evidence or logic rebuttal?
    EmeryPearson
  • I am not interested in your question begging links.  I am asking you to prove your claim that time and causality does not exist when matter occupies a tiny space.  You have one more chance to provide this proof or I will infer you have none and are bound by anti-science atheist mysticism.
    EmeryPearson
  • One of the ways you can tell you are dealing with a pretend scientist is that they Wikipedia is scientific proof.
    EmeryPearson
Sign In or Register to comment.

Back To Top

DebateIsland.com

| The Best Online Debate Experience!
2018 DebateIsland.com, All rights reserved. DebateIsland.com | The Best Online Debate Experience! Debate topics you care about in a friendly and fun way. Come try us out now. We are totally free!

Contact us

customerservice@debateisland.com
Awesome Debates
BestDealWins.com
Terms of Service

Get In Touch