Not to mention, @Erfisflat , that our model can predict events with astounding accuracy. This means that our model perfectly represents reality. Everything in the sky moves in the way that we calculated. Every experiment confirms our theories. But then you come out and say this: "Oh maybe the earth, by pure chance, looks curved in every way but it is somehow actually not?". It is idiotic. Not to mention that there exists no logical reason for why people would want to convince you that the earth is round. You say they want to hide land? Well, they can do it on a flat earth too. They do not need to invent this elaborate concepts to hide some land. There are much simpler ways to hide it than to come up with hundreds of fake theories that somehow represent reality perfectly. 

 And who exactly are "they" by the way? The Illumunati? Satanists? Jews? 

 The problem is that you make these absurd and irrefutable claims. Yes, maybe the earth is somehow - denying all observations and years of research - flat. And, yes, maybe this flat earth is controlled by Donald Trump or something. The problem is that YOU HAVE NO EVIDENCE. Even if you somehow show that the ball earth has no evidence, this will not prove that the earth is flat. And this will not prove that Jordan Peterson and Richard Dawkins are a gay couple that control everybodies minds. 

 You have no proof. You just have: "But, maybe?"s. 

@John_C_87 Well if we were to get technical about it, the earth could not be a cube either. Everything is made up of atoms after all correct? 

 Anyways, you know what "flat earth" means. And I do not think anyone here does not. So we really do not need to get that technical.

 Pretty self-explanatory. Art and Design is too broad of a community. Literature deserves its own place considering there are even communities for airplanes, cars and MAFIA GAMES... Guys, mafia games.

@Evidence So you ask for an example showing a change from one species to another and when you are given this example, you say you are not satisfied because the new species is not different enough? Yes, wild sheep and the sheep of today have similarities. That, however, does not change the fact that they are two different species. 

 The same goes for pigs, cows, cabbages, bananas... and so on. 

 Evolution is inevitable. If there is variation and if there exists a competitive environment, evolution is the long-term logical consequence of this. You can also say that: "adaptation + time = evolution" (which is not completely true but it still kind of is. )

 I will not touch NASA or any other space agencies and I will propose a simple way of knowing that the earth is curved.

 Fact 1: The sun does not change size during the day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhNFoy2fAr4
(Do not forget that the sun has to change size more than 2x on a flat earth, so flat earth videos showing 1-2 milimeter differences will not help your case.)

 Fact 2: You surely know about that experiment with sticks done by the ancient Greeks. Contact with a friend. Do that experiment. Or, if you have not completely lost your trust against all human beings, you can examine the experiments already done by people. 

Conclusion: If these two facts are true, the earth needs to be a ball (Well, at least it has to have a curve between the two places you did the experiment.)