How does removing legal guns from society

Legal versus illegal guns is a false dichotomy with no relevance to the crisis of violence your country is in. You are making a completely false assumption that the level of danger a gun poses to the public is dependent upon whether it was obtained legally or illegally, and from that initial false assumption come all your other false assumptions. Americans do exactly the same thing when they attempt to divide crime on the basis of race. It is utterly warped quasi-logic.

To make matters even worse, your data is radically inaccurate in the first place, which implies that you have obtained it from a source which is biased. 

When it comes to mass shootings, which is what this topic is actually about:-

93 of the mass shootings in the United States between 1982 and March 2023 involved weapons which were obtained legally; a clear majority. Only 16 incidents involved guns that were obtained illegally.

https://www.statista.com/statistics/476461/mass-shootings-in-the-us-by-legality-of-shooters-weapons/

And when it comes to your claim about less than one percent of gun crimes being committed with legal guns, then that is also false. This 2008 study puts the true figure twenty times higher:-

They found that in approximately 8 out of 10 cases, the perpetrator was not a lawful gun owner but rather in illegal possession of a weapon that belonged to someone else.

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/study-vast-majority-gun-crime-isnt-committed-lawful-gun-owners/

Yes you can. You can feel safe and buy one to feel safer.  Which is why i perfectly fine riding without one, but when readily available will put one on. Why not?

I understand your argument Michael, and at least you are trying to remain rational. 

Ultimately, the problem with feeling unsafe inside an urban environment largely boils down to the proliferation of guns in the first place, so people are compelled to contribute to the wider problem in order to solve their own individual problem. I would probably buy a gun in an environment where everybody else had one, because it would put me at a disadvantage not to have one. However, I would then become a potential problem for everybody else. 

The issue is really that people think to themselves, "OK, I have the right to protect myself, so it's perfectly fine to own a gun", without really considering that a large number of people (possibly including themselves) are irrational, volatile, self-righteous and frequently plain dumb. In a highly educated society where everybody was perfectly rational then guns might not necessarily be so much of a problem, but when you throw them into the mix in a place which is dominated by extreme political and religious propaganda, and the average person isn't particularly intelligent (or reasonable), then it's a surefire recipe for disaster.

Its not as simple as you'd think. 

It is my friend. Every single developed country which has taken action to regulate the proliferation and/or use of guns has recorded a decrease in gun crime.

You're going around with a costume on

What? Lol.

you've never owned or shot one before least to say experienced an armed confrontation.

Just another fallacy, buddy. I don't need to smoke to know smoking is harmful to health. I don't need to be a geologist to know the moon is made of rock.

Come outside of your closet one saturday and go out and ask any criminal. You tell em, go to that house and steal and they wouldnt do it.

You're just writing sheer nonsense buddy. We have plenty of house thefts in this country and none of the criminals have guns. Why would they take a gun, which will earn them five years prison time if caught, to a crime which they would ordinarily only receive two years for? 

The fact of the matter is that as a country you have been brainwashed. Not just in relation to guns, but guns are a fine example of the irrational beliefs the vast majority of Americans have been indoctrinated into through the media.

Any laws meant to take away our arms is an attack against the United States

This is exactly the kind of dangerously mentally ill nonsense I'm talking about. Wanting to reduce the vast numbers of innocent people killed in completely preventable, senseless deaths, is about as far away from an "attack against the United States" as it is possible to get. I'm afraid you are a literal moron. The language you are using is the language of a fanatic. 

Alarm codes, cameras, the projected value of the prize for invasion, and availability of knives or other weapons at location of the home invasion are clear reasons.

No they aren't John. A gun is useless against an alarm or a camera, I have no idea what your third item is about, and most people don't sleep with a knife nearby. Even if they did, a thief has a much greater chance of escape than they would facing a gun.

There is not one single iota of reason or rationality in any argument made in defence of guns in the home. They are all ridiculous. Home theft is not intentionally a crime of violence. The aim is to steal stuff. Once you add guns into the equation you create a potential bloodbath.

In Washington, the US military is routinely feted as the best equipped, the best trained, the most lethal, indeed, the greatest force ever fielded. However, its dismal war record since 1945 suggests otherwise.

An uneasy draw in Korea was followed by humiliating withdrawals from South Vietnam, Somalia, Afghanistan and Iraq – with dire consequences for US policy, interests and reputation. These disasters were counter-balanced only by small-scale successes – the invasions of Grenada and Panama – or limited-objective wins, such as the liberation of Kuwait in Gulf War I.

Indeed, a detailed 2015 briefing by the US Special Operations Command analyzing the last century of American overseas conflicts found nine losses, 43 ties and only 12 wins.

I would laugh but I know that you're serious.

Why would you laugh? You got your arses kicked in Vietnam, Korea, Afghanistan and Iraq. The last war America won on its own was the war of independence. 

Funny that you mention this because I dont know of any other country in the world able to pull off what the United States did 

Me either. Losing four wars in a row is quite the achievement. That puts you right up there with France.

you can bet your little fairy a** that US boots were there right in the middle of it every single time.

Well, no. You chickened out of both world wars until the very last minute. You didn't arrive until years after the fighting began. 

I dont know what nationality you are but whatever country you derive from, it wouldnt match United States in comparison. 

A comparison of what exactly? Number of prisoners? I agree with you there, given that the "land of the free" has more people in jail than anywhere else in the world. 

The problem with Americans is that you are loud-mouthed nationalist halfwits who can't win a war despite spending more on your military than the next 12 countries combined. That's quite a feat when you think about it. 

Dont you mean ISIS 

ISIS began in Iraq, John. After the American military had turned the country into a medieval warzone.