A Helicopter on Mars? NASA Wants to Try - The Best Online Debate Website | DebateIsland.com - Debate News And Just About Anything The Best Online Debate Website | DebateIsland.com
frame

Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

The Best Online Debate Website | DebateIsland.com. The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!


The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!

A Helicopter on Mars? NASA Wants to Try
in News

By joecavalryjoecavalry 393 Pts edited May 12
Will NASA sending a helicopter to Mars be productive?



Article -
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/11/science/mars-helicopter-nasa.html
DebateIslander and a DebateIsland.com lover. 



Debra AI Prediction

Predicted To Win
Predicted 2nd Place
22%
Margin

Details +



Arguments

  • EvidenceEvidence 789 Pts
    Will NASA sending a helicopter to Mars be productive?



    Article -
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/11/science/mars-helicopter-nasa.html

    Why 'try'? They already have the videos of the "helicopter on Mars";
    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/05/11/science/mars-helicopter-nasa.html 

     just as they have the videos of the "Rovers-on-Mars", not that they'll show us anything more after robbing us of more Billion$.
    Yes, for NASA this scam "IS Productive" .. for NASA, .. just as the Moon landing, Mars Rover landings were.

    Why not stick with the "Trip-to-Mars School busses"?



    Since when did NASA ever need an excuse to rob us of more billion$?
    someone234Erfisflat
  • someone234someone234 606 Pts
    NASA wants to try many things, they always have heavy funding requirements for them and take money, at least in part, from taxation.

    This money is then assumed to be going to top secret space research that we are only entitled to hear the before and after of but never the 'during'.
    EvidenceErfisflat
    Be tomorrow's hero, not today's idol.
  • EvidenceEvidence 789 Pts
    NASA wants to try many things, they always have heavy funding requirements for them and take money, at least in part, from taxation.

    This money is then assumed to be going to top secret space research that we are only entitled to hear the before and after of but never the 'during'.

    Yeah I hear you @someone234
    .. I was just wondering; which entertainment Industry makes the most profit, Sony, Disney or NASA? 
    Now Sony and Disney does put out some high quality entertainment, especially in movies, .. but what do we get from NASA? Some grade-school level CGI art, and a few desert photos taken through a red filter at astronomical prices, and their budget is assured by the World Banking system, which is our money. As for NASA shooting up rockets now and then, hey, that's their hobby. I used to shoot up rockets as a kid, many which ended up on rooftops, same as NASA's rockets end up in the oceans. We don't count hobbies which is for their own personal entertainment. So what else do we get from NASA? Even their sci-fi stories are pitifully poor: "NASA finds Tatooine-like planet in the Dagobah system" .. or: "NASA found 666 more black holes, which cannot be seen or detected with anything, but here is a third graders depiction of them!", .. pitiful, .. truly pitiful.
  • MayCaesarMayCaesar 541 Pts
    The atmospheric density on Mars is extremely low (below 1% of that of Earthen atmosphere), and as such the energetic efficiency of a helicopter vehicle on Mars is likely to make this plan financially catastrophic. Old good rovers have been used all this time for a reason. <span>:smile:</span>


    Erfisflat
  • ErfisflatErfisflat 1601 Pts
    edited May 28
    MayCaesar said:
    The atmospheric density on Mars is extremely low (below 1% of that of Earthen atmosphere), and as such the energetic efficiency of a helicopter vehicle on Mars is likely to make this plan financially catastrophic. Old good rovers have been used all this time for a reason. <span>:smile:</span>


    That's just silly. "Mars" (Greenland) has nearly the same atmospheric density as the flat Earth.


    Evidence
    Pseudoscience: noun; a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method.

    Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.

    https://www.gofundme.com/mwmvf-is-the-earth-flat

    The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.

    Wayne Dyer
  • ErfisflatErfisflat 1601 Pts
    Did they already put an astronot on Mars, @joecavalry, there is a man in that image.
    Pseudoscience: noun; a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method.

    Scientific method: noun; a method of procedure that has characterized natural science since the 17th century, consisting in systematic observation, measurement, and experiment, and the formulation, testing, and modification of hypotheses.

    https://www.gofundme.com/mwmvf-is-the-earth-flat

    The highest form of ignorance is when you reject something you don't know anything about.

    Wayne Dyer
  • EvidenceEvidence 789 Pts
    MayCaesar said:
    The atmospheric density on Mars is extremely low (below 1% of that of Earthen atmosphere), and as such the energetic efficiency of a helicopter vehicle on Mars is likely to make this plan financially catastrophic. Old good rovers have been used all this time for a reason. <span>:smile:</span>


    @MayCaesar look at this "Real Time" video of NASA's Mars (which supposedly is 54.6 million km from NASA) landing:



    They forgot all about the "time-delay", and opened the shoots, and everything else in real-time!
    Or maybe like @Erfisflat mentioned about the AstroNOT or guy hiding behind a rock was doing all the controlling!?

    See the hugs and pats on the back in the video? That's for pocketing another 2.5 billion dollars for giving us evolving apes some cheap, very cheap red tinted photos of our desert.
    Time 1:01:00 got to be the worst acting in NASA theatrical history! 
    Erfisflat
Sign In or Register to comment.

Back To Top

DebateIsland.com

| The Best Online Debate Experience!
2018 DebateIsland.com, All rights reserved. DebateIsland.com | The Best Online Debate Experience! Debate topics you care about in a friendly and fun way. Come try us out now. We are totally free!

Contact us

customerservice@debateisland.com
Awesome Debates
BestDealWins.com
Terms of Service

Get In Touch