Should "In God We Trust" be on American money?

TTKDB

@Zombieguy1987

Why do view the below as a fallacy?

Again, can a God, or God do anything to you in real life?

If a God in general, has zero influence in your life, or influences how you live your life, then why would you or anyone else feel some sort of need to place any "trust" whatsoever in your life, if you have nothing to do with a God to begin with? 

Prayer gets a court ruling, driving it out of schools.

(Some atheists, hear a public prayer being said for some kids, who were affected by gun violance, and then afterwards, filed a lawsuit over that prayer being said in public?)
Is this another example of the separation of the church and state conversation? 

(A memorial shaped like a cross, is getting grief over it's shape, because some individuals are upset over a grave stone shaped like a cross, and want the grave stone visually amended to suit the anti religious individuals?)
Is this another example of the separation of church and state conversation? 

Is taking the (In God We Trust) wording off of US currency, another example of the separation of church and state conversation?  

Could you please present some counter arguments to them? 

TTKDB

@WordsMatter

What is the point that you're trying to make? 

"why not put an elephant on a unicycle on all our money? Or lil Wayne? Or beelzebub?"

Isn't this the theme of the forum? 

"Should "In God We Trust" be on American money?"

@WordsMatter ;

What does putting an elephant on a unicycle on all our money?
Or lil Wayne?
Or Beelzebub?

Have to do with the forum? 

midopreal

Well considering the separation of church and state is a thing. But you could say the currency is privately owned I guess.

TTKDB

@Zombieguy1987

Why do you view the below as irrelevant?

Can you provide any counter arguments to them?

(What is the point that you're trying to make? 

"why not put an elephant on a unicycle on all our money? Or lil Wayne? Or beelzebub?"

Isn't this the theme of the forum? 

"Should "In God We Trust" be on American money?"

What does putting an elephant on a unicycle on all our money?
Or lil Wayne?
Or Beelzebub?

Have to do with the forum?)

John_C_87

@TTKDB ;
You do understand that "IN GOD WE TRUST." can be prove to already be off of some forms of currency in circulation inside the united States of America right? So it isn't really a debate about 

John_C_87

What holds the American Federal Reserve Note legal Tender for debt both foreign and domestic?

John_C_87

@midopreal ;
The separation of church and state is a legislated governing process which takes place in certain forms of judicial separation. It is not a democratic idea that is blindly applied by popularity, it is a judicial republic process of constitutional separation that is applied in a well regulated democratic method, hence the name separation of _________ and state.


The state in this instance is how belief is shared to the public as the basic principle in whole truth, nothing but truth, religion is a united union publicly as shared belief. It is at this state which it can not be sorted out by the general welfare of a common defense. Public. 

John_C_87

So under the Federal Reserve seal on the left of the note the words read. “This note is Legal tender for all debts both foreign and private”

That is a big claim to be made in writing. All debt public and private. “IN GOD WE TRUST” A statement of saving to be made on the rational or irrational creations of debt and its burden. In relationship by axiom in a declared value set by numbers, as receipt, then held separately by each note.

Again. What is it that holds the Federal Reserve’s Claim of Legal Tender for all Debt both foreign and private true? What other forms of payment are using the word dollar, and also can uphold this specification? Do some forms of payment imply that if legislation is past to establish unconstitutional laws a legislation may not have to pay its own debt?