Creation and Evolution, which is a long debate that has been happening since Charles Darwin lived and wrote his book origin of species, are both religious because you need to believe. According to the Pew Research center survey, approximately 60% of Americans, unfortunately, believe in either theistic evolution or scientific evolution. What is evolution? The evolution theory is that 14 billion years ago there was a big bang. Around 4.6 billion years ago the earth formed a hard-rocky crust then it rained on the rocks for millions of years making soup and the soup came alive 3 billion years ago and evolved in everything we have today. I believe that the earth is only around 6,000 years old. What Charles Darwin observed was variation in kinds, which is called microevolution.
(2 In the Evolution theory there needs six stages. First there is Cosmic Evolution, which is the origin of time, space and matter. They try to explain that through the Big Bang. Next is chemical Evolution. They exclaim that the big bang produced helium and hydrogen. How do we have all the other elements? There is fusion in stars that create the elements but they have a chicken and an egg problem, the elements create the stars and the stars produces the elements. Which came first? That is a gigantic chicken and egg problem. Next, there is planetary and stellar evolution. We have never seen a star form or a planet. Next is organic evolution which is the origin of life. Life cannot come from non-life. People, which have tried, have been unsuccessful. One DNA molecule is more complicated than anything we can imagine or create. Next is Macro Evolution, which is one kind changing to another kind. Next is microevolution, I do not approve the term because it is just variations within kinds. The first five are religious the last one is science. When a mother dog has a litter, she might attain big dog or little dog but they will always give birth to a dog. While evolution believes in the beginning dirt, creation believes in the beginning God. Of the six stages, five are definitely religious.
Some evidences that the evolutionist put up are fossils, embryology, vestigial structures, similar DNA, poor design. I will not be able to explore everything but I will touch on a few important points. Fossils do not count as Evidence. You can’t prove that the fossil produced any offspring with mutations. Even if Fossils did count as evidence, they have not found any intermediate stages. Embryology has been proven wrong years ago. I am amazed why some evolutionist still bring it up. They tell us that the human embryo has gills similar to a fish. Those little flaps of skin later develop into bones in the ear and glands in the throat. They never have anything to do with breathing! Vestigial structures, which is brought up a lot, has lots of information. Some of the common vestigial structures brought up is that the whale has a vestigial pelvis. 6That is not true. The whale's pelvis is used in mating. Another one is the human tailbone is another one. The human tailbone is not vestigial because it is an anchor point for nine muscles. Similar DNA proves more of a common powerful designer than a common ancestor. Even with the similarities there still so many differences that it proves more of a common designer that a common ancestor. They also try to communicate that we are poor designed. They talk about the eye and how it is poorly designed. They tell us that our blood vessels are in front of our eyes and that having the blood vessels behind the Renata the blood vessels in front of our eyes a out the last defense to from uv light. One more thing, mutation are a loss of information not a gain of information. There is much more to this debate . In this short paper, I did not even touch on the big bang. In conclusion, I realize that evolution has no evidence.
is evolution a good theory?