DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
what we think is our? well maybe it really isnt and thats why we pay taxes http://dollarsandsense.org/archives/2010/0310alperovitzdaly.html the mail man, the milk man the guy that repeairs your car and your air conditioning, fixes your roads, he gets a cut man we all do
The passion for destruction is also a creative passion. Mikhail Bakunin
By the same token, crime is committed by the group, not the individual - hence, say, every time someone murders someone, everyone should chime in and serve some jail time.
It does not matter how wealth is created; what matters is what contract defines who receives it. When I hire a gardener to tend to my farm, we agree that I pay the gardener the money, and he tends to my farm. Everyone gets something out of the deal as agreed, hence any further wealth redistribution is obsolete: we have already agreed on how to distribute it.
In case of taxes, the difference is that the contract is forced on people. Me and the gardener can discuss the terms and come to the agreement that works for both of us. But me and the government cannot discuss anything: I do not have the option to just refuse the deal, as the government will jail me for tax evasion if I try to.
This really is a lousy argument, sorry to say.
Debra AI Analytics      +   
  Considerate: 84%     Substantial: 98%     Spelling & Grammar: 96%     Sentiment: Negative     Avg. Grade Level: 10.72     Sources: 0     Entity Sentiment Detection: further wealth redistribution    jail time.It   it.In case of taxes   tax evasion  
____________________
  Political Analysis: No Political Affiliation  
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
It does not matter how wealth is created; what matters is what contract defines who receives it. When I hire a gardener to tend to my farm, we agree that I pay the gardener the money, and he tends to my farm. Everyone gets something out of the deal as agreed, hence any further wealth redistribution is obsolete: we have already agreed on how to distribute it.
In case of taxes, the difference is that the contract is forced on people. Me and the gardener can discuss the terms and come to the agreement that works for both of us. But me and the government cannot discuss anything: I do not have the option to just refuse the deal, as the government will jail me for tax evasion if I try to.
This really is a lousy argument, sorry to say.
  Considerate: 84%  
  Substantial: 98%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: further wealth redistribution    jail time.It   it.In case of taxes   tax evasion  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra