It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
From the big "bang" to the Eternal singularity
its not news that science disagrees with everything it's ever said, but this week, science takes the preverbial cake off the shelf and calls it's a sandwich.
Science has redefined the big bang as,
"the Big Bang is described by a hot, dense state that simply expands and cools."
-New science and the big bang explained Pg. 5
Newton's law of cooling
Newton's Law of Cooling determines that the rate of change of the temperature of an object or mass is proportional to the difference between its own temperature and the ambient temperature (i.e. the temperature of its surroundings).
That is if an object loses heat over time as a result of ambient temperature
However, Newton's law of cooling addresses, that any object or mass that is the result of Nuclear fusion, creates heat and photons.
If a singularity was always hot ( ie the existence of the singularity was always hot as a result of Nuclear fission)
The singularity it's not subject to a condition of change IE, cooling.
1. thermal energy or masses defined as the state of the existence of matter
1.retrain heat, or produce heat
2. Do not produce heat and as a result cool
3. do not expierience change when their molecular composition ( the cause of their heat) is the cause of the thermal energy a mass produces.
The second Dilemma
if the singularity is subject to change
The cause of it's change must be defined or definable
Based on Newton's law of cooling,
there has to be a cause for change and the or a decrease in tempreture of a mass.
However because cooling is proportional to the heat of an object and the ambient tempreture
The only cause of a decrease in tempreture would be opposing or ambient temperature
As a result without a change in ambient tempreture a singularity would not cool or expierience any change in tempreture.
To suggest so would be to suggest that the sandwich would cool significantly too fast for anything to expand, because the rate at which it cools, would be based on the ambient tempreture as the cause of it's cooling.
Which would determine, that when masses form molecular bonds and isolate any particles, molecules, or matter prior to a rate of expansion
Or that the rate of expansion is evuivalent to the rate at which a mass cools determines the universe along with the rate of radioactive decay should be about as wide and big as my finger.
Sciences age old tune
But let me guess that took millions of years?
Newton's law of cooling, is a differential equation, and the Stefan boltzman constant describes that the thermal yield of a mass that expieriences high tempreture produces 4 times the amount of thermal output when the ambient temperature of surrounding masses effect it's own.
Antimatter is not hot or cold, it lacks material substance
Newton's law of cooling states an object or mass cools as a result of
1. A condition that causes thermal energy to be lost over time, due to the effect of ambient temperatures, and the rate at which an object cools as a result of the ambient tempreture of it's enviroment
2. It's obvious,A mass can not maintain or retrain tempreture for any period of time if it's own thermal energy and heat are the result of nuclear fission and cool at the same time, that's proposterous BS.
It's hilarious to watch science suggest that the ambient tempreture of the universe at time of expansion is 1 billion degrees and it suddenly started cooling, because it implies the half life of the thermal energy in the universe, or, the rate of radioactive decay, caused the universe to form and live outside the boundaries of it's half life or rate of decay.
Based on this week's BS
The universe should have stopped expanding at 8 seconds during expansion and weighing Newton's law of cooling in, the universe should be about as big as my finger.
the singularity always existed and never expanded, as science state, the singularity did not expierience any type of expansion or change, prior to what they refer to as the big bang,then they imply
that the singularity and the conditions that define it do not allow for expansion to occur because of it's existence as a mass of thermal energy or nuclear fussion.
A singularity that is not subject to change, because of what aspect defines the singularity, it's existence, and subsequently the conditions of the singularitys existence are in contradiction to the theory of expansion
Science fail count as numerous as they have spoken.
Jesus I'd Lord.