The Best Online Debate Website | DebateIsland.com. The only online debate website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the leading online debate website. Debate popular topics, debate news, or debate anything! Debate online for free! DebateIsland is utilizing Artifical Intelligence to transform online debating.
The best online Debate website - DebateIsland.com! The only Online Debate Website with Casual, Persuade Me, Formalish, and Formal Online Debate formats. We’re the Leading Online Debate website. Debate popular topics, Debate news, or Debate anything! Debate online for free!
Atheism/materialism doesn't justify morality in Religion
I'm a Christian. One of the biggest problems I see with materialism is the inability to justify objective moral values and duties if you have a materialistic worldview.
Let's take Ted Bundy. He raped and killed women and girls. A materialist can believe what Ted did to be wrong, but a materialistic worldview doesn't allow for the condemnation of Ted's actions. You may think (and feel) that Ted was wrong to rape and murder, but ultimately the universe doesn't care. Moreover, the rapist doesn't agree with you: he thinks and feels that he's completely justified in murdering/raping. Ted just isn't interested in playing by the rules.
The question now becomes, whether we can call what Ted did 'wrong'. I see no reason to suggest we can (based on a materialistic worldview). Can a jury rightfully sentence Ted? On what grounds/rules would a jury sentence Ted? We can't use 'our' moral rules because Ted never agreed to play along. This leaves us with his own rules, but his rules don't condemn his actions, they justify them.
See, the problem isn't that atheists can't be moral, the problem is that atheists can't expect someone else to be. And a society that can't expect everyone to adhere to moral laws is not a society I want to live in.
The ground is level at the foot of the cross. Therefore, I boast in nothing but Christ.