There seems to be a variance of views as to what constitutes orthodox religion, non-orthodox religion and atheism for that matter since some people seem to misguidedly label atheism as a religion.
So, let's just clarify the issue and take a random, non-contentious, simple, neutral piece of prose. Let's say, for example, Mary had a little lamb. Sounds very straight forward, but how do different ways of thinking interpret such an eloquent piece of literary brilliance?
Now, a mainstream non-orthodox theist would read it as meaning Mary ate a small portion of sacrificial meat.
Whilst an orthodox follower may interpret; Mary had a "relationship" with an underaged sheep.
Then, of course, an atheist or realist would interpret the same passage as Mary had a little lamb.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments