It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
If you had read the premise as opposed to wallowing in your festering hate for all things good and Christian, you would know that children are secure in my Lord's compassion because where there is no law or ability to comprehend the repercussions of violating same, there is no sin.
I did read the premise and for the third time you side-stepped the issue, and for obvious reason.
It doesn't matter if you were to preach that God is going to give ice cream to kids. The point is that you are using innocent children to promote your ugly contrived agenda of doom, gloom, fear and guilt if people don't subscribe to the same radical, bizarre thoughts as you. It's one thing to pick on those who are naive, gullible, weak and vulnerable to pedal your usual vulgar, contrived tripe but to target innocent children is taking depravity to a new level.
So all children are secure, are they?
Secure from what?
Shall we elaborate on all the doom, gloom and morbid consequences that you are proposing about kids?
For example, what if a child has parents or grown-up siblings who are avid atheists (as I and most of the civilised population do)?
Isn't it so nice to instill the thought in that kids head that he is going to be "secure" while the rest of his or her family are going to suffer the most repulsive, morbid agonising torture in Hell for eternity?
Already courts are filling up with cases where children (some made wards of the state) are suing and prosecuting parents and church authorities for psychological abuse of children who have been taught such repugnant untruths to satisfy the ulterior nefarious motives of those who dish out such cruel and fearful nonsense.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments