Should we abolish charities and humanitarian aid organizations?

theinfectedmaster

Argument Topic: Yes we should.

Charities don't often help poor people, and humanitarian aid organizations often destroy the economies of other countries and/or they go to the corrupt leaders of their country. I'm talking about charities that are specifically designed to help poor people. I think we should have a government program instead.

Barnardot

@theinfectedmaster This is a good question and I feel very strong about this because yes we should have charities but I reckon there are a lot of charities who just take the mikey and skum off all the tax free profit they make and get rich off of it. For example take churches for example. What they do is register them selves as a charity and all the money they get is tax free and all they do is buy more land and buildings and art treasures and get rich out of it. The Catohlic church for example is a prime example of this because they have about 14 billion dollars worth of art treasures and palaces. And mother Theresa was a real sower faced bitsh because she didn't use the charity money to feed and cloth kids she spent it on building buildings. So it made her look like she was doing some thing and they made her in to a cannon. And also the Catholics who doughnate all the money get half of it back on tax refuns. So thats the kind of charities we should abolish. And then we can turn the churches in to cinemas or housing for the poor.

jack

theinfectedmaster said:

Should we abolish charities and humanitarian aid organizations?

Hello the:

Only if you hate your fellow man.

excon