DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
@walterba The eyewitnesses could be faked. It has been done in the past.
Also something like this could be faked. It could give the Chinese reason to hate the Japan. It could also justify the war crimes the US and China did against Japan.
Their are many people who witnessed the massacre possibly. Also, I don’t believe that something like that would be faked.
I, personally, trust logic and evidence, not anecdotes or eyewitness accounts.
I am no longer active on DebateIsland or any debate website. Many things I have posted here and on other sites (Such as believing in the flat Earth theory or other conspiracy theories such as those that are about the Las Vegas Shooting or 9/11) do not reflect on my current views.
The Nanking Massacre was a relatively minor event, compared to the whole array of historical records of the war crimes the Japanese army committed during World War II. Falsifying one such event would not change the status quo significantly, and there were hundreds of reasons to go on the offensive against the Japanese Empire. Even if there was no real evidence of those events (and there is plenty), I fail to see why anyone would want to falsify historical records this way.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
  Considerate: 76%  
  Substantial: 38%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Can you point to some examples of evidence.
  Considerate: 89%  
  Substantial: 21%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 80%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Besides eyewitness.
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 14%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 50%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 61%  
  Substantial: 31%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Also something like this could be faked. It could give the Chinese reason to hate the Japan. It could also justify the war crimes the US and China did against Japan.
  Considerate: 66%  
  Substantial: 58%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1p6M-VgXHwwdpJarhyQYapBz-kRc6FrgdOLFAd3IfYz8/edit
https://debateisland.com/discussion/comment/18248/#Comment_18248 (Me officially stating that I am no longer a flat-Earther)
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 27%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 96%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra