It won't be the end of his movement, he has inspired an ideology with himself at the center, while Ron Desantis may replace him as the representative of the Republican party, he is an opponent of Trump, many of the Trump supporters will not be on board with Desantis, they're not going to support any politician who's not fully in line with Trump's ideology and against the rest of the establishment, because they will have become convinced that the system is corrupt, and that Trump is their savior, who then will replace Trump? One that Trump likes, perhaps Donald Junior, or maybe even Tucker Carlson, and once this happens, what then? Politics will be far more divided, the democrats already think Trump is a danger to their "democracy" and Trump fans feel the same way about the rest of government, so things are going to get a lot more nasty, as one side gets more nasty the other side will follow, building up each other's hatred, and it probably will end badly, with a civil war? Who knows, hopefully things will cool down before that happens, despite what they say, I think they all know that would be a disaster. but the people are fully prepared for that, they will want a civil war, they might even try one themselves, in all likelyhood it won't turn into a real civil war, just a few random acts of political violence, but perhaps someone will capitalize on it? What do you think? What are your predictions?
This is all theoretical, Trump probably won't go to jail, but none the less, the attempts as prosecution have been successful at convincing people that Trump is being persecuted by a corrupt establishment, whether or not it's Trump in power or his friends, the division's going to get worse.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
The maximum possible sentence for Trump is 740 years in prison. This is calculated by multiplying the maximum sentence for each count by the number of counts (37). The maximum sentence for each count is 20 years.
However, it is highly unlikely that Trump would receive the maximum sentence for each count. Federal defendants are rarely given the maximum possible punishment. In fact, the average sentence for a federal felony is only about 5 years, for a total of 185 years.
There are a number of factors that a judge will consider when sentencing Trump, including his age, health, and prior criminal record. Trump is 76 years old and has no prior criminal record. This means that he is likely to receive a sentence that is lower than the maximum possible sentence.
In another thread, I predicted Trump will die in prison in 2039. I stand by that prediction.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
What will happen if Trump is convicted?
He loses a presumption of innocence.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Well thats like saying what happens when its not day. Well like derrr its night.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Well thats like saying what happens when its not day. Well like derrr its night.
The fact is the sun does not ever go away, it is day all the time as whole truth, and a person losing a presumption of innocence is a rather major victory in making connection to established justice. Part of the issue that may not fully understood is that being a republican is an American Constitutional Right there is no other political party as whole truth. Executive officer Trump can be described as a walk on having never understood we do not have a choice to be republican or not. The object of this point of American republic is to establish up front beyond reasonable doubt damages created in the political arena are those reflective in the court be established justice Civil cases may lose credibility of criminal credibility have been fulfilled.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Let us not kid ourselves: 99% of the people who want Trump to be convicted want it not out of some deep sense of justice, but out of desire to not face the possibility of him becoming the next US president. This is what makes this situation despicable. I am all for people going to prison for committing heinous crimes, and that applies to every single individual - but singling out someone who is one's political opponent and wanting them to be imprisoned in whichever way it can be practically accomplished is a completely different stance, one I find disgusting and extremely dangerous.
I think that Trump would be (and was) an awful president, and yet I would strongly prefer him becoming the next president to this scenario. If Trump is convicted, then whoever wins the 2024 election will be widely perceived (by both Democratic and Republican voters) as illegitimate/undeserving of their position, much like Ding Liren winning the latest world championship match in chess is not taken seriously by most chess players on account of Magnus Carlsen being objectively the strongest player in the world. A country in which almost no one believes that the current president has won the election fair and square... what could go wrong here, right?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Try to obstruct justice much?
If Trump is convicted, the USA could be looking at another civil war.
America is looking at several ongoing civil wars no matter what happens to Ex-Executive officer Trump his conviction like others in politics has little to do with anything else other than the repercussions to their own actions over time.
The productive, tax paying people of America will realize that a totalitarian coup has taken control of their country which has no legitimacy.
Totalitarian control is based on the use of Executive orders which are illegal in many conditions of law anyway it is following these type orders which is the greater cause of risk, even as a voter. You are simply mistaking a legal malpractice of law with a coup and Armed Services court intervention has become necessary due to the political use of Executive order. Stop trying to create a disturbance as distraction the level of appropriate legislation is far too low to be explained as a democratic issue alone. You are right though Executive officer Trump will not be the last political figure to face consequence right or wrong.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I hope you're right.
He isn't right though, don't worry............With all the luting and damage ever caused before, during, and after by the American's 1st Civil War the evidence had not been destroyed in its entirety. The three major grievance set as issues of civil unrest are discrimination, sexual prejudice, and improper use of unsecure credit on a national level. Trump may have made out a lot better overall had he not made an argument to negotiate and address the illegal process of legislation which is a legal malpractice of law built around pregnancy abortion at the level of American Supreme court. Which is simple only a very small part of the Sexual prejudice grievance which by self-evident truth is addressed directly by female specific amputation, with now an additional necessary assignment in Armed Services Court of law / tribunal. Just as the idea of sexual prejudice is directly addressed openly as the more perfect state of the union on American constitutional right with the declaration of women's independence under the United States Constitutional Right "Presadera."
This type of grievance negation may have worked for council had the opposing council side had a more perfect state of the union to established justice. But, just like the 1960 had unethical interference by educational instructors. The idea of the importance and necessity of having better written constitutional state of union had actual meant to a cause of ending Civil War’s unrest including the unrest in the Korean War.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
What do you call the process when computer AI temporarily shuts down live trading midstream on the almost new an almost pefect state of the union set for the stock exchange?
Got to say one thing for sure, any person who files claims of corporate bankruptcy must know by experiance a little about shredding and burning documents. The more corporate bankruptcies the better someone should get by experience, right?. Stock market circut breakers.......still work.
New Stock-by-Stock Circuit Breakers | Investor.gov
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Oddly, enough the press does not need be excluded to hold the constitutional right of freedom of press to the media. The press is simply not allowed to write or repeat trial information about the trial until after the proceeding has been fully completed. This could mean for as long as the appeal process takes to be finished as well. They the press / media are nothing more than an additional witness at any trial, for the record America has never held a perfect constitutional state of the union yet. So, any America that is to be great again, is an America without realistic goal in a legal sense to begin with.
The idea that Trump is even the first Executive officers to face criminal issues in the practices of law is false as many have most have also happen to just cut deals, maybe just better than Executive officers trumps deal.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@MayCaesar
I understand your concerns about the precedent that would be set if a former American president were to go to prison. However, I believe that the rule of law is more important than any political considerations. If Trump has committed crimes, then he should be held accountable, regardless of his political status.
I also disagree with your assessment that 99% of the people who want Trump to be convicted do so out of a desire to prevent him from becoming president again. I believe that many people want Trump to be held accountable for his actions, regardless of the political implications.
I agree that it is dangerous to single out political opponents for prosecution. However, I do not believe that this is what is happening in the case of Trump. The charges against him are serious, and they have been brought by a bipartisan group of prosecutors.
I believe that it is important to uphold the rule of law, even when it is inconvenient or politically difficult. If we do not hold our leaders accountable for their actions, then we are sending the message that they are above the law. This would be a dangerous precedent for our democracy.
I understand that you are concerned about the potential for instability if Trump is convicted. However, I believe that the long-term stability of our democracy is more important than the short-term risk of instability. If we allow our leaders to break the law without consequences, then we are undermining the foundation of our democracy.
I believe that we can overcome our differences and build a better future for our country. However, we must be willing to uphold the rule of law, even when it is difficult.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Here rests part of the problem President of the United State of America is not a political status it is a legal status. It is only an international political status outside America due as there are no political obligations to server, protect, and defend American constitution in any of courts not with direct ties to the United States of Supreme court appeal process, it is not an American Political status it is a legal status created by constitutional right. Thus, it is why a woman such has Kamala Haris or Mrs. Clinton can never be a President of the United States of America they are to be considered Presadera of the United States of America. The Federal laws that many including Trump, Biden, and Mrs. Clinton influence may or may not have broken are not to stop the American United States Constitutional Rights which have received damaged and left broken from reaching trial.The first grievance is none of the executive officers mentioned had in fact been President of the United States of America. The reason for this is due to appropriate legislation was never conducted by congress…
We can attempt to assemble a tribular ourselves, but it is the appropriate legislative path to seek an official American Armed Service tribunal asking the Armed Services act as liaison… in this matter.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
My argument though does not imply that political considerations should overrule the law. It, in fact, says the exact opposite: that the law should apply equally to everyone. That is not the attitude that most people wanting Trump to be imprisoned display, and that is precisely what the issue here is.
It seems to me that mishandling a bunch of classified documents is a much smaller offense from the justice perspective than, say, throwing the economy into chaos and causing a runaway inflation. Which is going to impact your life more: the former, or the latter? If Trump really has done something atrocious (say, murdered a political opponent in the dark alley), then absolutely he should be convicted. Him being convicted over something this marginal does not bode well for the country. Ever heard of Khodorkovsky and what Putin did to him in Russia? The guy was accused of "corruption" and imprisoned for many years, while in reality, first, he did not do anything that most other oligarchs did not (therefore, all of them should have been imprisoned by the same logic), and second, he funded organizations opposing Putin's regime. Do you not see the parallels here?
Consider the fact that the court has had many years to look into this, yet the process only really began when it became clear that 1) Trump is planning on running for president in 2024, and 2) he is quite likely to win the election. The timing of this, as well as the sloppiness of the prosecutors, has the same flavor as political persecution in other pseudo-democracies. It is possible that all this is just a huge set of coincidences, but... do you expect a large fraction of the population to buy it?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Trump has been accused of mishandling classified documents on multiple occasions. He has also been accused of obstructing justice and of abusing his power. If these accusations are true, then he should be held accountable for his actions.
I do not believe that the parallels between Trump's case and the case of Khodorkovsky are accurate. In Khodorkovsky's case, he was accused of corruption and imprisoned for many years. However, there is evidence to suggest that he was actually imprisoned for political reasons. In Trump's case, he has not been accused of corruption. He has been accused of mishandling classified documents and of obstructing justice. These are serious offenses, but they are not the same as corruption.
I believe that it is important to allow the investigations to proceed without interference. The American people deserve to know the truth about what happened, and they deserve to know whether or not Trump is guilty of any crimes.
I understand that some people believe that the investigation is politically motivated. However, I believe that the evidence shows otherwise. The investigation is being conducted by experienced prosecutors who are committed to upholding the law. I believe that they will follow the evidence wherever it leads, regardless of who it implicates.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Bogan
I agree that the majority of American people do not like bullies. However, I do not believe that the majority of American people believe that government officials are misusing their power to persecute people who they either do not like, or who present an existential threat to the power, prestige, and prosperity, of the elite.
In fact, I believe that the majority of American people believe that the government is doing a good job of upholding the law and protecting the rights of all citizens. They may not agree with every decision that the government makes, but they believe that the government is acting in good faith.
I also do not believe that most Americans will vote for Trump because they see in him a persecuted individual who personifies themselves. In fact, I believe that most Americans are tired of the political polarization and gridlock in Washington, D.C. They are looking for a leader who can bring the country together and get things done.
I do not believe that Trump is the answer to this problem. He is a divisive figure who has only exacerbated the political polarization in the country. I believe that the best way to move forward is to elect a leader who is willing to work with both sides of the aisle to find common ground.
I understand that some people believe that the "Deep State" is a real threat to the American people. However, I believe that this is a conspiracy theory that has no basis in reality. The government is not a monolithic entity that is out to get anyone who disagrees with it. The government is made up of millions of people who are simply trying to do their jobs.
The government is not perfect, but it is the best system we have for protecting our rights and our freedoms.
I hope that the American people will choose a leader who will unite the country and get things done. I believe that this is the best way to move forward and protect our democracy.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
My argument though does not imply that political considerations should overrule the law. It, in fact, says the exact opposite: that the law should apply equally to everyone.
This statement makes no sense as whole truth there are several American United States Constitutional Amendments that say quote "Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation." This is a written record that members of Congress have already set in motion a means to political rule over law. The American United States Constitution is the only document that describes the more perfect state of the union with established justice and its protection of the voter was ingored by many states for political gain. As whole truth nothing of law should ever apply equally to all it is a self-evident admission of legal negligence a law must make a direct connection between right and wrong with truth, whole truth, and nothing but truth.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Trump has been accused of mishandling classified documents on multiple occasions. He has also been accused of obstructing justice and of abusing his power. If these accusations are true, then he should be held accountable for his actions. I do not believe that the parallels between Trump's case and the case of Khodorkovsky are accurate. In Khodorkovsky's case, he was accused of corruption and imprisoned for many years. However, there is evidence to suggest that he was actually imprisoned for political reasons. In Trump's case, he has not been accused of corruption. He has been accused of mishandling classified documents and of obstructing justice. These are serious offenses, but they are not the same as corruption. I believe that it is important to allow the investigations to proceed without interference. The American people deserve to know the truth about what happened, and they deserve to know whether or not Trump is guilty of any crimes. I understand that some people believe that the investigation is politically motivated. However, I believe that the evidence shows otherwise. The investigation is being conducted by experienced prosecutors who are committed to upholding the law. I believe that they will follow the evidence wherever it leads, regardless of who it implicates
None of it matters as the focus of legal matters by the Federal Court or State court cannot hear the case. "Congress shall have power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation." The Federal and state governments are involved in the matters directly by the instruction congress has placed on guidelines of written legislation of law in advance. You are making a argument that is over privacy of an accused person.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
How on earth you figure that out is one of life's enduring mysteries.
Next comes the revelation from Elon Musk that the fibbies told all of the online media organizations that Hunter's laptop "had all the hallmarks of Russians disinformation." That was to bury the story, influence the election, and give Joe an "out" when he debated Trump. He claimed that 52 intelligence agents had cleared the laptop as "Russian disinformation." In other words, my dear Jules, the President that you supported looked the US public in the face on TV and told them a lie. He knew it was not true. I have got to hand it to Joe, he is a very polished . He can do it without any tell tale embarrassment at all.
Next comes Joe who had stolen classified documents stored in his garage and all over Chinatown. One would have thought that if they were going to indict Trump for not storing clasified papers properly, then they should have indicted or impeached Joe at the same time. But they will wait until after he withdraws from the Presidential race for "health reasons" and then say that he is too senile to prosecute. One law for Trump, and a different law for Biden. All courtesy of the FBI and the Department of Justice.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Anyway...Trump will die in prison in 2039.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
They will order Joe to step down, and when he does, they will guarantee that the US Justice System which they own will not prosecute him. They will say that yes, he was corrupt, but now he is just is too senile to prosecute. Gavin Newsome or Robert Kennedy Jr will be the next Democrat Presidential nominee. They can't use Kamala because she is even more unpopular than Biden, and that's saying something. And Kamala, although a fool, is probably honest, so that character flaw will not sit well with Deep State Democrats.
I also predict that Trump will beat the charges as the whole thing was dreamed up, just like the Russia hoax, and the claim that 51 US intelligence experts opined that Hunters laptiop, detailing many of the crooked deals that he and his father were up to their necks in, was "Russian disinformation." Even if Trump gets convicted on one of the 37 charges he has been charged with, , it will just make him more popular, and he will appeal all the way to the Supreme Court who the last I heard, have not yet been corrupted by the Dems. Trump will win the next Presidential elections by a landslide. As a matter of fact, if they could prevent every US citizen who has a degree from some loony left university from voting, it could be the first unanimous Presidential vote in history.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Bogan
I understand that you are concerned about the possibility of corruption in the Biden administration. I share your concern, and I believe that it is important to hold our elected officials accountable for their actions.
However, I do not believe that the evidence of corruption against Biden is as strong as you suggest. The allegations against Biden and his family have been investigated by multiple law enforcement agencies, and no charges have been filed.
I also believe that it is important to be fair and impartial in our assessment of these allegations. It is possible that Biden and his family are guilty of corruption, but it is also possible that they are innocent. We should not rush to judgment until all of the evidence has been evaluated.
As for your prediction that Trump will win the next presidential election, I believe that it is too early to say. The political landscape is constantly changing, and it is impossible to predict what will happen in the future.
I believe that it is important to focus on the issues that matter to Americans and to choose our leaders based on their positions on these issues. We should not allow our elections to be decided by personal attacks and conspiracy theories.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
As for your prediction that Trump will win the next presidential election, I believe that it is too early to say. FALLACY! E.O. Number #45 is about as far away from president as a man equal to all other men might get. To be honest I do not feel he even wants to be President of the United States of America. There has not been a Presidential election ever in America, every election that has taken placed and has been called a Presidential election is in fact, meaning truth, has only been for an Executive officer. Funny enough a Presidential Presaderial finding would be a Congressional act performed in a federal court much like a civil lawsuit inwhich a process of appeal could still overturn the court ruling of a man proving himself President.
To point out just how imperfect the state of the union has become with the idea a women could ever be President of the United States of America the federal court could hold massive criminal trials as the number of people who have possibly committed perjury while voting is so high,it would be the only way to ensure the voter no longer qyuilifed to vote be removed from then voting pool. Provided if those voters are convicted in a just and expedient way without prejudice, liberlay educated ir not as this has not bearing on the potential causes of criminal perjury. This liberty and justice for all includes Lawyers, Doctors, Politician’s, and of course, "We the people." The voters remaining as members of the state of the more perfect union, can the connection to established justice get any better than that?
Here's where we wholeheartedly AGREE.. If you could SUPPRESS the libs from voting, Trump would win..
In a show of hands, who here believes sending a potential candidate to commit crime to law school with Federal loans has a higher potential to create smarter criminals?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Bogan
I understand that you believe that Joe Biden is a corrupt president and that you have evidence to support your claim. However, I would like to point out that the allegations against him have not been proven in a court of law. In fact, many of the allegations have been debunked by fact-checkers.
For example, the allegation that Biden used his position as vice president to pressure Ukraine to fire a prosecutor who was investigating his son, Hunter Biden, has been repeatedly debunked. The prosecutor in question, Viktor Shokin, was widely seen as corrupt and ineffective, and his removal was supported by the United States and other Western countries.
The allegation that Biden laundered money through his son's business dealings in Ukraine is also unsubstantiated. There is no evidence that Biden or his son engaged in any illegal activity.
The allegation that Biden engaged in racketeering is also unproven. There is no evidence that Biden used his position to extort money from businesses or individuals.
The allegation that Biden committed treason is also serious, but it is important to note that treason is a very specific crime. It is not enough to simply have contact with a foreign government. In order to be convicted of treason, a person must knowingly and willfully betray the United States. There is no evidence that Biden has done anything that meets this standard.
I understand that you may be skeptical of these facts, but I urge you to consider the source of your information. Many of the allegations against Biden have been made by right-wing media outlets and politicians, who have a history of making false and misleading claims about Biden.
I would also like to point out that the burden of proof is on the person making the accusation. In this case, the person accusing Biden of corruption has not provided any credible evidence to support their claim.
In conclusion, I believe that the allegations against Joe Biden are unsubstantiated and unproven. I urge you to consider the source of your information and to demand evidence before making any judgments about Biden's character.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Bogan
There is strong evidence that Donald Trump has committed crimes, including:
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I am not in favor of stopping these investigations, but I am in favor of being very clear and open about their nature. I do not care much for Trump's fate, but it is not about Trump: Trump is just one person. It is about what this system is like. Just as in Khodorkovsky's case, the problem was not that Khodorkovsky was such an amazing guy who everyone loved and they were deprived of their lover's embrace - it was what that sham trial and subsequent imprisonment meant about the nature of the ruling regime. If Khodorkovsky can be eliminated like this, then so can anyone else. You think the political hawks going after Trump will stop at him? Please. Complacency is the best trigger for political cancer that is totalitarianism.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Boing? Boing? Boing? Hey dummy. Biden is on video tape BRAGGING about how he got the prosecutor fired. In what must be the most du-mb as-s things that Biden has ever done, he bragged in front of a camera about how he withheld $1 billion is US aid to Ukraine unless the Ukrainian prosecutor investigating his son was fired. That tape by itself legally proves that Joe Biden uses US taxpayer money to prevent lawful investigations into his family businesses. It is exactly like Tony Soprano bragging in front of a camera about how he had somebody whacked. Honestly Jules, you have to stop playing video games and have a look around.
You must be living in a cave with no electricity to say something as stu-pid as that. The fibbies have had Hunter Biden's laptop for over four years which listed all of his shady deals. Even the computer guy who looked at Hunter's data knew it was proof of very illegal activity. That is why he took it to the FBI who buried it. Fortunately, he kept a copy and gave it to Rudy Guiliani. Once again proving that the FBI is running a protection racket for the Biden Crime Family.
Juleskorngold quote There is strong evidence that Donald Trump has committed crimes, including: Obtruction of justice on multiple occasions, including by firing FBI Director James Comey, attempting to fire Special Counsel Robert Mueller, and pressuring witnesses not to cooperate with the Mueller investigation.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@MayCaesar
The best way to prevent totalitarianism is to uphold the rule of law and hold those in power accountable. Even former presidents.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Bogan said: Fox is the most trusted news service in the USA.
Bullsh*t. According to a 2022 survey by the Pew Research Center, only 21% of Americans say they trust Fox News "a great deal" or "a fair amount." This is significantly lower than the trust levels for other major news organizations, such as CNN (42%), MSNBC (38%), and the New York Times (36%).
There are a number of reasons why people don't trust Fox News. One reason is that Fox News is a conservative-leaning news organization, and its coverage of news events is often seen as being strongly biased in favor of conservative viewpoints. Additionally, Fox News uses opinion programming, its hosts tend to make false or misleading statements and engage in fear-mongering and propaganda.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Just saying trusted for what protecting United States Constitutional rights, that isn't happening...
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Why are you not more skeptical of the government's claims? Is skepticism towards those who hold the power the foundation of opposition to totalitarianism? Or is it only so when the claim does not happen to align with your personal political preferences?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
If you think that you are really are well informed, then this might be an opportunity to display to you how you are being lied to?. I would opine that a "research Centre" claiming to poll people on who they trust is worthless? Here in Australia, the pollsters get it so wrong when predicting election outcomes that nobody takes any notice of them any wore.. What really denotes trust is ratings. What Pew Research says about ratings I just don't know. But Fox has been bragging about being number one for a couple of years now. Not does Fox claim to be number 1, they have produced graphs on their talk shows displaying an interesting fact. CNN's ratings are in the toilet and most of the former CNN audience, who we can assume is left wing, are for the most part not changing to another left wing media outlet. Fox's research claims that most of them are switching to Fox.
Pew Research's xlaim that CNN is trusted twic as much as Fox sure looks susso when you remember that the CNN management sacked CNN's producer in orer to prevent the continuous slide in ratings that CNN was experiencing. The owners of CNN realised that if they did not do something to stop CNN simply being an extreme left advocacy organization instead of areasonably impartial new sorganisation (which it used to be), their media platform would go bankrupt for lack of an audience. So, the CNN management brought in a new CEO to bring some balanced reportage and try to restore CNN's credibility. This new CEO insisted that CNN stop being an extreme left activist organization and instead, at least pretend to engage in fair and impartial reportage. He sacked Brian Steltor because Steltor is a half wit who's "hate Trump, hate Trump, hate Trump" rhetoric was so all pervasive, that even people who were leery of Trump thought it was over the top.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Bogan said: What really denotes trust is ratings.
More bullsh*t. High ratings of a news show do NOT mean it is highly trusted.
People may watch a news show for reasons other than trust. For example, they may watch a news show because it is entertaining, or because they agree with the political views of the hosts.
Even if people trust a news show, they may not watch it regularly. This is because there are many different news shows available, and people may only watch a few of them regularly.
Ratings can be influenced by factors other than trust. For example, a news show may have high ratings because it is the only news show available in a particular time slot for that viewing area.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@Bogan
Fox News refers to its hosts as "opinion hosts" or "commentators" rather than reporters. This is because they often offer their own personal opinions on the news, rather than simply reporting the facts. They may also use humor, sarcasm, and other forms of entertainment to make their points.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Media organisations usually consist of two divisions, one division which is supposed to simply inform the public of news events, and another consisting of political pundits who examine the significance of breaking news stories, and how this will affect the public. This is common among media of both the left and the right. I have no idea why you are telling me what I already know, as if it is some sort of revelation from you? Although, the tone of your information seems to suggest that if right wing media does it, it is doing something insidious?
I would really like to understand why you think as you do? You have said that you despise Donald Trump because he is “divisive”. I have no idea how you come to that conclusion? Especially when it looks obvious to me that it is the Dems who are stoking up racial hatred, as well as trying to turn the young against the old with their “Human Induced Climate Change” cult. So too, it is the Dems who are stoking the fires of intolerance with their advocacy of absolutely absurd ideas on “transgender” equality, which is making the USA (and many other western countries) the laughing stock of the whole world.
I can not understand how any rational person with a triple digit IQ can once again fall for the empty promises of socialism, which has a perfect record of total failure within every nation which was du-mb enough to embrace it? I can not understand how it is that you think that the Biden administration and the Biden family itself, are not intrinsically corrupt? The latest example being the way in which Hunter Biden has escaped a long jail sentence for a series of serious crimes, including unlicensed influence peddling, serious tax evasion involving millions of dollars in unpaid taxes, and a serious firearms charge? There are other glaring examples of the US dual justice system which should really concern you, but strangely, it does not. I wonder why that is so?
Do you really want a Russian or Chinese style totalitarian state where senior administration officials collude with rich oligarchs to control the US population, through total control of the media, the persecution of political opponents, and the misuse of the judicial system to go after anybody that the Democratic Party and their tame administration, sees as a threat to their power and position?
I have often wondered at how much opposition the intelligent people in Russia, Cambodia, North Korea, Iran, and so many other intelligent people in other countries put up when they realised that more than half of their populations had gone stark raving cra-zy, and were advocating to instal a totalitarian system of government which would enslave them forever? And here we are in 2023, and around half of the US population has gone crazy too. They support the Biden administration with it’self evident corruption, influence peddling, election interference, persecution of political opponents, media manipulation, political censorship by stealth, and it’s two tiered justice system, where the Democratic party’s elite of pseudo aristocratic family members can get away with anything.
And you not only refuse to see what is happening right before your eyes, you even support it? Ama-a-a-azing.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra