Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
Do you get how the facts about climate change caused the shift from the calling it agw to acc? Your coconspirator phite supplied this link: https://e360.yale.edu/features/air-pollutions-upside-a-brake-on-global-warming in a futile effort to disprove agw. But it supported anthropogenic climate change. His and your continued use of the out dated agw is evident of self deception and delusion.
The alarmist and the scammers are losing, being outed as I told you from day one. The scientist are winning the debate. (that too I told you). Thankfully about 98% of them agree anthropogenic climate change is real and are studying it.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Okay, who was the person or organization which conducted this mythical poll? How was it conducted? How many "scientists" were polled? Every scientist in the world, or just a representative example? If a representative example, how big was the representative example? How many scientists are there in the world? Was it a secret ballot ? Or, was it possible, even probable, that any negative statement made about climate change could be made public and therefore a danger to a scientists continued career as a scientist?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Well first of all you need to accept the fact that there is no such thing as a well throught out play from Bogans Playbook. That is because it has been proven that @Bogan has only half a brain and that nullifies the well thought out theory straight a way. Hes been asked that question before any way and he was unable to answer because guess what? He would have to use the other half of of his brain which he doesnt use. And even if he did he would be smaked in the head with a brick that every thing he comes up with is total 100% made up crapola or comes from scam web sites. And be sides it would take ages for him to chew through all the corks dangling from his Acruba before he would even get a round to even think about addressing such a question.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Earth's temperature fluctuates naturally over tens of thousands to millions of years. Today, we are experiencing very rapid change in temperature, which is caused by humans (the greenhouse effect). Not only that, but there are many other problems that humans have created:
Deforestation, habitat deconstruction, overfishing, resource depletion from overconsumption, urbanization, waste generation, marine ecosystem depletion, overfishing, water pollution, industrialization, soil degradation, and much more. I don’t think you will agree with me, but I just wanted to point that out. Edit: I am new to this so I accidentally posted twice so my bad.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Earth's temperature fluctuates naturally over tens of thousands to millions of years. Today, we are experiencing very rapid change in temperature, which is caused by humans (the greenhouse effect). Not only that, but there are many other problems that humans have created:
Deforestation, habitat deconstruction, overfishing, resource depletion from overconsumption, urbanization, waste generation, marine ecosystem depletion, overfishing, water pollution, industrialization, soil degradation, and much more. I don’t think you will agree with me, but I just wanted to point that out.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Today, we are experiencing very rapid change in temperature, which is caused by humans (the greenhouse effect). Not only that, but there are many other problems that humans have created:
Prove it.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
(By, David Herring and Rebecca Lindsey)
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
When you expect poor people to pay $20,000 more for a EV car than they do now, that's someone who doesn't care about poor people, and care more about virtue signaling than actually solving the problem.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Seriously though you're right, virtue signaling isn't helping to solve the problem.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
So true. Why can't we just approach a problem for what it is? It doesn't have to be an 'all in' mentality of us vs them.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
True but then again we're dealing with people who think Large metropolitan cities are "insignificant" pockets of air pollution, causing copd and all.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Our economy is rapidly changing, fast and slow, but mainly that doesn't even matter. We use cars every day for transportation, to get where we have to go, but the catch is that global warming is caused by the CO2 omissions coming from the gas we burn, ultimately causing heat to rise. When we wonder, "Why is it so hot up in here?" while in a traffic jam, seeing that the air is all blurry, that's the exhaust burning. So yes, it's a fact.
But wait. It's also a scam.
When we say that we a going to stop/slow down global warming how is money going to do anything? Just because you are using polyester for your clothing doesn't mean that you aren't wearing clothes at a mass production factory that wovens clothing using electric sewer machines. Global warming happens by not just gas, but from practically everything. The money that we print, the cars that we manufacture, is just causing the heat to climb higher and higher. If we are using money as the husher, doesn't that mean we are just going to either tax clothing more to make it more desirable, or what? There could be more, but for know that's all we know.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
It is feasible that CO2 emissions can cause global temperatures to rise, Mr Christian soilers, but nobody can prove it. However, given what is at stake we should at least concern ourselves that it could be true. But since we just do not know, destroying western economies to chase a mere possibility is insanity. If you are a climate alarmist, then you are definitely going to lose this one. People in democracies can put up with most stu-pid decisions by governments, up until our economies and safety go sideways. When taxation and inflation go through the roof, then the hip pocket nerve kicks in. western people appear to be reaching that point now. Polls, for what they are worth, are consistently showing that of the ten things which concern voters most, climate change is at the bottom of the list. The more the climate cultists run around in red faced apoplexy, gluing themselves to road ways and performing other stu-pid stunts that disrupt ordinary people's lives, the more the public considers the climate crazies are in need of professional help.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Very objective view, I commend you. That's the crux of the problem. Extremes on both sides of this topic are only interested in screaming the loudest. Yes scum on the left exploited the thing before we had a good understanding. Of course the right responds with their extremism thinking we can dump pollutants in the air at will with no consequences. One look at a smoggy city tells us that ain't true. And with one in four copd patients being non smokers we can't deny the effects we ARE having.
Long-term exposure to particulate matter PM 2.5 and nitrogen dioxides increases your risk of developing COPD. Sources of PM 2.5 are motor vehicles, factories, powerplants, wood burning and wildfires. Exposure to poor air quality worsens symptoms and accelerates lung function decline in adults, especially if you have other risk factors for COPD. https://www.lung.org/lung-health-diseases/lung-disease-lookup/copd/what-causes-copd
Most want to phrase the argument as such: Climate change is too big for humans to stop, it's a cycle, or that we've accelerated the cycle and we can slow it down. Those are political positions. But as noted above from the American Lung Association we are having an effect on our environment that makes it very feasible that the cycle of climate change we're experiencing could be effecting us in negatives ways it might not be if we weren't polluting our planet. The science leads us to conclude we need to stop polluting. The problem is too many political and/or economic interests blur the lines.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I made several points in my reply to you, Mr CHristianSollers, it would be helpful if you were more specific in which of my points that you is not agree with.
@ChristianSollers quote But it is proven that CO2 is a huge culprit for anything thermodynamic or heat-related.
CO2 is a greenhouse gas, so increasing it's proportion of CO2 should raise temperatures. But CO2 is, even after nearly 200 years since the industrial revolution, just a trace gas in our atmosphere . It is fark all. If you even double fark all, it is still fark all.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
It is absolutely a scam I believe these fundraisings are for personal benefit especially if it’s government related because even if they’re “trying” to make a difference or not they are getting a cut. Global warming is because of the sun we can’t do anything to stop the sun look at the earth and how big it is. Imagine the sun. We can’t stop them warmings! Also, pollution? Pfft I believe if it were to happen I wouldn’t be in an instant it would take centuries if nit milleniums to destroy the earth unless we had a giant lightsaber lol.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra