Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
If something is scientifically unable to be proven then to believe it is false would be unscientific. I am confused on your position.
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 32%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.02  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
Test: Search for God
Falsifiability: Nope
You cannot find God because humans do not have an infinite perceptual field.
What we can do, is disprove the bible, a book supposedly was written by multiple people over 1500 years that were mind-controlled by God[1] and is considered "infallible."
Since a book written by an infallible being must not be false, then we can prove it to be false(oh wait, we already did)
Sources:
[1] http://www.bibleinfo.com/en/questions/who-wrote-the-bible
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 57%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.14  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 24%  
  Learn More About Debra
The metaphysical is outside the purview of science, science makes no statement on the question of God. Logic and science are not the same thing, neither is philosophy or science.. To deny what is outside the realm of science, does not conflict with it.
If you could point where science makes any claim concerning a deity, I'd be more receptive.
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Which God? How are you defining your deity?
How can you test for which you have not yet defined?
How can you conclude feasibility without defining nor testing?
Why does your deity require an infinite perceptual field to detect? Do all deities require this?
And yes, I do agree with your last statement, personal deities are falsifiable, and it would not be illogical to deny them.
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.62  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 54%  
  Learn More About Debra
But to answer your question, if you indeed believe in everything in science, then you exhibit traits of a religious belief. However, as far as I know, "atheist" refers to someone who rejects the existence of supernatural beings, not necessarily someone who doesn't have any religious beliefs. So the answer is probably "no".
  Considerate: 95%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
The creator and supreme being (in a monotheistic religion such as Christianity)
Feasibility ≠ Falsifiability
You would need an infinite perceptual fiend to detect because humans cannot see simultaneously everywhere.
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 90%  
  Learn More About Debra