Note: I would like to point out that my true position is neither pro-life nor pro-choice as I think both of these terms just reflect dichotomous ways of thinking. However, the position I will be arguing here is for the pro-life position. The reason I am doing this is for a bit of fun, a challenge, and ultimately a way to learn and progress further in civil debates. The way this debate will work is that the first person posts an argument, then the second person posts their rebuttals and then their arguments for their position. So without further ado let's get at it.
Debra AI Prediction
Debate Type: Lincoln-Douglas Debate
Voting Format: Casual Voting
Opponent: Plaffelvohfen
Time Per Round: Blitz - 15 Minutes Per Round
Voting Period: 7 Days
Forfeited
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments (2) Comments (12)
Arguments
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Considering the subjective nature of morality, and the actual purpose of the Law (which is to "protect the rights of citizens", not to impose subjective morality and beliefs), allowing abortions to occur in a safe medical environment is less disturbing (has less negative impact) to society than the opposite.
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra