I don't care if a stripper marries a belly dancer, as long as they are both consenting adults, and love each other. Marriage in my not so huumble opinion, is beteen two consenting adult lovers that want to legally incur rights to their relationship. Race, sex, gender, and gender identity should NOT prevent adult couples from legalizing their love.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
One could make an argument for privatised marriage, where a third part acts as a witness of a legal contract and takes responsibility for its fulfilment. But I am not sure if that would still be formally classified as marriage.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
You never seem to be able to do this.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Do you have any legal objection as why two people can be united by Binivir or UnosMulier speak now of forever hold your peace?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
She is a public witness her opinion maters.....
As a witness like many other people she simply may be unreliable in this matter. A legal objection must be made by her on a union of Binivir or Unosmullier or she will be proven wrong.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Religiously the argument of same gender marriage is basically over alienating parental right placed in danger by children created as a type In Vitro Fertilization, Immaculate Conception, or Virgin Birth by medical science. The cost of the medical research has created a demand for return on investments made in not just human life but in money. Some of those investments by public investors in an open market as public holdings.
The real educated failure may occur when followers of religious institutions did not understand the basic responsibility that are created by a United Marriage state legal by law. This bond has left those who fail at the union with a burden to create there own title upon their failure. Those who succeed with Marriage responsibilities of defending the basic union. The words till death do they part is simple making an agreement that Marriage is a title which can not be dissolved, period, ever. Even when the legal ties of the union have been dismissed by courts and nations, it is a verbal likelihood and lives on past the couples it is carried by.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
You call people names and misrepresent arguments. When your called out on it, your only defense is calling me a troll.
So ill give a second chance, find the quote in my posts where i said we should be able to choose who people marry...otherwise you are the true troll
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
No-one is asking about your right or wrong. Do you, or anyone you know have a legal objection in describing two people united in public likelihoods as Binivir, Unosmulier, or even Virmulier ?
Does anyone on this forum?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
The problem with the question YeshuaRedeemed is being Gay/Lesbian is grounds to break all legal ties to a marriage already as a legal precedent. The two are not the same commitment. The likelihood is still a gay man could be married to a lesbian woman instead of being united as Binivir, even Bini-Mulier.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Lol you still cant quote where i said that i should be able to tell people who they can and cant marry. You cant even backup your own statements.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@MichaelElpers
You’re a poor witness in preserving a public likelihood as the church is not being forced to perform a Marriage. The church is forced to perform a Civil Union. The church is basically forced to witness a likelihood it does not condone, or wishes to be part of.
Does a church agree to a witness account in written documented with Binivir or Unosmulier without legal objection?
Do you legally object to a union made by Binivir and UnosMulier?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
I object. Affirming that same gender contracts are outside the boundery set by Marriage and are private Binivir and Unosmulier conducted by legal counsil directed by civil aligation brough public by an accuser not legal counsil. Legal counsil has to questioin its roll in a persuit in malpractice of law that is undertake by a forced public perjury of witness, in publicly fashion, and should not be made a pupit in abuses held by uncredible witness accounts of longstanding likelihood.
There is no reason to beieve you are Christain, nor should it matter, only a witness in public liklihood.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
@ YeshuaRedeemed: Yes true, the fact is a man who seeks legal attachment to a man, or woman to woman, as a man or woman, can still get married to a woman as man, and man as woman. ( confusing statement) However two men cannot be legally married to each other nor two woman, this do to legal precedent created in the preservation of marriage, prior to creating all woman as equal. The legal precedent itself can be changed that will not fix any relationship to the manipulation taking place of witnesses in wholesale fashion. As you have not objected directly only implying of discrimination, and a state corporation had been created regardless by use of plagiarism, which is a potential crime that can be legally witnessed as it is formed under the title Binivir and Unosdmulier.
Keep in mind Marriages can themselves become crimes, or criminal. Discrimination is criminal as well as perjury and the whole public is a witness to a perjury account. Also very important is Gay and Lesbian are accusation to that become a potential crime after someone is united in Marriage.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
So, we are not confused in the grievance of basic principle. Are you trying to tell me how to be a witness on an open public likelihood? All marriage’s can be objected to, all Binivir’s and Unosmulier’s as well.
We the people have a right to BiniVir, Unosmulier, marriage, and civil union as a legal right being witness…..Gay and lesbian are accusations as much confession when connected to people.
The legal concern that qualifies a truth otherwise is not a right, it is a duty. I have a duty not to commit perjury on official record.
I will not go into detail of the disturbing fact how innuendo of sexual perversions are a part of basic principle in witnessing account that is instructed. Again, another pressing legal matter. Discrimination does not limit the idea any basic truth in simple easy to follow principle along a line of legal history.
This is a new clear legal objection as statement of grievance. The grievance is not saying a focus of witnessing could not have been married. Elaboration can go on to say as a witness that those who have multiple so called marriages with use of divorce are by witness account simple VirMulier, VirFemina, and so, when demonstrating only the ease at which someone, anyone can be married until their death without use of lethal force.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra