Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
People who say that those who advocate for reduction of welfare spending dislike it when poor kids get to eat free lunches - are intellectually dishonest. Almost nobody likes it when someone is malnutritioned; people only disagree on what the best solution to this problem is. California seems to have the worst homelessness and poverty issues in the US right now, and it also happens to have the highest welfare spending per capita in the US, highest taxation rates, etc. Clearly blunt taxation and welfare spending is not the way to solve these issues, and a more delicate approach is needed.
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.8  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: highest homelessness rates    Washington DC   New York   reduction of welfare  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
The Republicans, are trying to do the best that they can, without having to negotiate around the Liberal roadblocks, that the Liberals have built, around their pro illegal immigrant supporter, and pro criminal supporter, or pro offender supporter fan- bases, being that some of the Liberals are doing a great job, of in a sense, Politically kissing up to those same fan-base followers?
The illegal immigrants in the United States, for the most part get free medical care, on the legal US taxpayers some.
Race on race gun violence happens every day in the United States, but I've yet to see any individuals of the same race taking to the streets to protest race on race gun violence or murders?
Kids are getting killed just like the adults are, but no one is brave enough to protest race on race murder, or gun violence?
But if a Caucasian police officer, shoots another individual of a different race, the streets are filled with individuals protesting that kind of a shooting?
If a black police officer, were to shoot a black criminal, or offender, will the same black community, that protested the Caucasian police officer shooting, take to those same streets to protest a black police officer, shooting a black criminal, or offender?
The rest of the non Liberal Voters, are angry right now, because they are watching, some of the illegal immigrants, and some of the criminals, or the offenders, getting a free (lunch) or in other word's, Taxpayer Funded Handouts, being given away by those same pandering Liberals, which is grossly unfair, and unequal to the rest of the non Liberal public?
  Considerate: 49%  
  Substantial: 89%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.28  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: illegal immigrants    offenders of the United State   race gun violence   United States  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Maybe indignant or in denial. The assumption is that the process will die in the senate, that no matter what the impeachment will be overturned and nothing will happen to Trump.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 97%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: best word    assumption   impeachment   process  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 12%  
  Substantial: 68%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.88  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: atheist-progressive socialist democrat    true cancerous boil of the butt of America   mutilation of babies   epitome of stupidity  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
Isn't your god supposed to tell you to be nice to people and provide for the needy and such?
If you really followed the word of Jesus it seems like that would be a natural path to acceptance of a new social order through his spiritual message.
Maybe you are just spiritually and mentally ill.
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 54%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.56  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: free lunch    poor kid   word of Jesus   people  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.16  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 28%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.54  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 47%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.74  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: deep hatred seep    behalf of opinions   lies of your opponents   fingers  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 38%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.52  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: servant of Satan    will of your spiritual father   nbsp   Eternity  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 25%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
First of all I want to apologize for the funny emoji put on your response. I accidentally hit it.
You said>>>4. Republicans want a bigger government when it suits their social conservative values when rallying against LGBT and secularism. It is hypocritical to make this point.
Back to topic.
I have not heard of anyone complaining about free lunches for kids from anybody only complaints of how it is implimented. Those complaints have more to do with proceedures that make it obvious to other children that they are getting free lunches therefore embarrassing the kid to the point where the kid would rather skip lunch. Another has been about giving seperate type lunches to kids on the free lunch program thus causing the same problems as the fist.
People, not just Republicans, are angry about the impeachment b/c it was done soley on political lines. There were no crimes involved. No fact or first hand witnesses to any crimes. That is the first artcle. The second artlcle has no legal basis.
The House screwed up by rushing it and not doing their duel diligence to investigate or prove their case. Every rep who voted for it should be embarrassed by their vote because if they were being honest jurors how could they have been able to come to that vote without facts or actual crimes being involved.
If you were on trial would you want to be convicted on such flimsy evidence? Would you want to convict someone you didn't know or have any preconcieved notions about him or her on that evidence? I would think no matter what your feelings of a person is that any reasonable, rational person would not.
I don't think this a presiddence that that we as the people of the USA should want to see set. An impeachment should rise to the level of beyond reasonable doubt with actual facts backing it as it did in the last impeachments.
This case did not have these elements and that is one of the reasons why the Democrats are so desperately wanting to call witnesses in the Senate. They are praying that these witnesses can prove the case for them in the trail phase. The same witnesses they should have taken the time to call before deciding on impeachment but didn't want to take the time to do. Rushing through it claiming it was a national emergency, which has shown also not to be true since they knew they did not have a case that was compelling enough to remove the President and they are stalling on moving the case further.
The founders I believe intended that an impeachment should contain enough evidence that it would compel a bi-partisan vote for it as there was iprevious impeachments.
Just because the Democratic Senate did not find the arcles against Clinton to be a reason for removal does not undermine the fact that they were factual and President Clinton did have to again face those charges and pay for them after his presidency. Of course he got a sweetheart deal and I don't know if the other 9 indictments were wrapped into the deal.
As in the case of Nixon. Again guilty without a doubt and if he had not resigned probably would have been impeached and removed on a bi-partism vote, which is why he rsigned..
I don't know enough about the first impeachment but what I've heard there was a scandal and.underhanded dealings that surrounded it.
In any case I think I have made my case for why people, not just Republicans are rightfully upset about this impeachment.
  Considerate: 62%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.22  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 60%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 75%  
  Substantial: 94%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11  
  Sources: 2  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
Not in a manner of harping on Republicans here, but I think you pulled those statistics out of your a$$. New England states always rank the lowest on homelessness rates, so Massachusetts would obviously not be on that list. And Massachusetts and Maine shelter 95% of their homeless population. Florida usually ranks as one of the highest, and they aren't a democratic state. Nevada is another bad one, and they're in the red. Texas is also another that ranks highest, and they're as red as you can get. Political affiliation doesn't influence homelessness rates in states.
  Considerate: 72%  
  Substantial: 98%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.52  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: highest homelessness rates    Washington DC   New York   Political affiliation  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
Using left leaning media reports gives only one side of the story.
You said>>>The (biggest) big government laws republicans have ever advocated for, was the war on drugs. It is the pinnacle of big government. I don't think I need to explain this.
I think you do need to explain.
You said>>>When some republicans rally against same-sex marriage, they usually tend to advocate for the government to not recognize them at all and forbid their marriage. Many of these republicans advocate for amending the constitution (government) itself for marriage to say "one man, one woman. I see this as bigger government interference. Also advocating for refusing LGBT in the military, I see as bigger government interference.
Now that is a difference of opinions. I will add it is not one I agree with but it is the right of people, even Republicans, to have a different opinion than yours or mine for that matter.
You said>>>Another big government item that republicans support would be daily prayer in schools. I see this as bigger government, forcing religion into the public (federal) education system and telling children to religiously pray.
Again something I don't believe in b/c what type of religious pray would they be using? Besides there is suppose to be a seperation of church and state. So if is a state paid for school prayer needs to be left out of the classroom. If people want their kids praying in school then they should place them in a private school that supports their choosen religion. If they can't afford that then they just need to continue teaching their children in their homes and places of worship. I do also believe that even public schools need to respect a childs religious beliefs.
Anyways I don't really hear a push for prayer being brought back into schools by politicians. Maybe your hearing something I've missed. Besides I think if the issue was brought in front of the courts it would be struck down.
It is not just Republicans using Governor's and federal laws to surpress local decisions, Democrats do it too.
In some cases when Federal law is in opposition to State or any municipalities laws it is the right of the Fedral government to step in. Especially laws that were but in place by Congress which is represented by every state and party.
If the States or municipalities disagree with it they are free to take it to court. If they do take it to court they are likely to lose if the judges follow their mandates to follow Federal laws. Basically if anyone finds it important enough it would have to be appealed all the way to the Supreme Court to decide as to whether the Federal law is constitutional. Just like they did the marriage law. Now that the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of the right of same sex marriage. If Congress was to legistlate against it I believe it would be immediately relooked at by the Supreme Court and they would have to decide whether or not to overturn themselves, change the parameters of their past rulings or standby the original rulings.
  Considerate: 79%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 17%  
  Learn More About Debra