It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Analyzing Netanyahu's decision to disband war cabinet
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has dissolved his country's war cabinet, which helped set Israel's war policy against Hamas. The move comes after one of Netanyahu's main rivals, former General Benny Gantz, resigned over the lack of a plan for Gaza after the war. Jon Alterman, director of the Middle East Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, joins to...
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
Problems begin either when human rights are not respected, or when people start calling things rights that really should be classified as privileges. In those cases, human right violations are going to follow, making people less free and happy.
  Considerate: 86%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Human rights    great practical ideological axiom   Great societal organisations   inherent rights  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 94%  
  Substantial: 48%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 13.24  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Human rights    human KIND   spiritual image of God   moral law  
  Relevant (Beta): 39%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 57%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.22  
  Sources: 2  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Human rights    human KIND   spiritual image of God   moral law  
  Relevant (Beta): 33%  
  Learn More About Debra
Fabulous piece of writing Ricky
  Considerate: 90%  
  Substantial: 13%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.02  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Fabulous piece    Ricky      
  Relevant (Beta): 84%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 68%  
  Substantial: 68%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.4  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 73%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 70%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 83%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.66  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 60%  
  Learn More About Debra
Sure, what do you specifically disagree about in my comment?
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 29%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.58  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: comment         
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Wrong - in a wrong manner; not rightly; awry; amiss:
https://www.dictionary.com/browse/wrong
A toilet with four toilet seats is a human right. A bathroom with four toilets is a human right.
A bathroom with one toilet, one toilet seat, and one roll of toilet paper is a united state constitutional right.
- Where as -
A bathroom with one toilet, one toilet seat, and no roll of toilet paper is just a human right.
On a scale measuring from right to wrong a civil human right is less than a civil constitutional right, a Civil constitutional right is less than a Civil United State Constitutional right, and a united state constitutional right is less than a independent wrong, but is still a basic human right.
As a high jump in track and field a Human Right is the bar at the knee height of the shortest possible contestant who is human.
The Point
A basic principle that is to be as close to describing of breaking law, without detailing a break of law, as it is at this point that many rights then become wrongs. No longer being right, Right's, or just Wrong's, Wrong. It is a Right at wrong.
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.3  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: human right    united state   civil constitutional right   basic principle  
  Relevant (Beta): 78%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 92%  
  Substantial: 41%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 85%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.46  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: rights    comment   Plaffelvohfen   God  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 93%  
  Substantial: 63%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 84%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.36  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: point btw    rights   comment   moment  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.76  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 21%  
  Learn More About Debra
I think many people confuse freedom of action itself with freedom to take this action under all possible circumstances. For example, you have a freedom to drive a car; however, it does not mean that you can run over pedestrians or crash your car into a grocery store.
Regarding freedom of speech specifically, I do not believe in libel/slander laws and other similar things; I do not think anyone has the right to not be misunderstood/misjudged, as a right of one cannot demand any action from others, including refraining from unfairly criticising them. I have been criticised unfairly many times in my life, with rumors spreading about me that were not true, and every time I felt it was up to me to properly advertise myself so misunderstanding is cleared.
However, action itself can be a part of the bigger action. If I tell someone, "Please take a gun and shoot the person in front of you. The gun is not loaded, so it will be just a prank, and I will pay you money at the end", they take the gun (that happens to be loaded) and shoot the person in front of them, killing them - then obviously I will be responsible for what happened. The responsibility is not for my words themselves, but for the context I created by my actions that made these words harmful.
It is okay to spread lies about someone; I mean, it is not okay morally (in my view), but it should be protected by the law. However, if you spreading lies about someone leads to a tangible harm to their life, then they can sue you for compensation of damages. If you accused someone of a sexual assault on you, which caused them to be fired from their job and ostracised by their acquaintances, and could not prove their misdoing in the end, then you will have to compensate them for their losses.
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 90%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.5  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 95%  
  Learn More About Debra
Stars formed, planets coalesced, and on at least one of them life took root.
Through a long process of evolution this life developed into the human race.
Humans conquered fire, built complex societies and advanced technology .
All of that so we can argue about nothing.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 99%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.68  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: human rights    physical part of reality   humans   rights  
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra