Gay people once married at a much greater rate, having children and wives, even though they may have had an attraction for the same sex.
They at least had somewhat of a normal life with loving kids and a wife, regardless their unnatural attractions.
Today, activist LGBT groups have shamed these people out of the closet to enjoy an epidemic of Aids, and one broken relationship after the next.
Yes yes, I know there are a few committed relationships, but they are the exception.
The problem being that when boys grow up, they find out that living with Dad no longer works out so good. Two male personalities do not fit well together. Two dominate male personalities would more often butt heads.
You ask how I come to these conclusions? Look around, see for yourself how often we find life long committed Gay relationships.
There are also men who have attractions for children, animals, corpses, multiple wives, etc. etc., but they choose to live a normal life with a wife and kids, not giving in to their unnatural attractions.
Today's Left and activist LGBT groups tell Gays to flaunt their lifestyles no matter how many parents are offended. They scream BE WHO YOU ARE, no matter if it goes against the Science of Biology. They say push it into our public schools, indoctrinate those impressionable children against the parent's will.
Don't get me wrong, it is none of my business how you live your lives, and I would never try to prevent your freedoms to live as you choose. My beef is with the LGBT activist groups controlling the Democrat Party and forcing their agendas into every aspect of our lives, our schools, our Girl's sports, our State's rights, etc.
It has become political, and these angry groups are giving Gays, who respect the right of others to disagree, a bad name.
I always say it takes respect for other's beliefs, if you expect respect for your own.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
https://www.mckinleyirvin.com/resources/same-sex-marriage-parenting-divorce-in-washingto/divorce-for-same-sex-couples/
I sympathise with your position with regards to vilification of gays who choose to have heterosexual marriages, but you should not make up your own statistics to support your narrative.
Also, if you want your attributions to biology to be taken seriously, at least name the subject properly. There is no such thing as "Science of Biology": biology is science. And no, that science does not say anything of the sort of statements you are claiming.
  Considerate: 85%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.9  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
Spare me your ludicrous stats. Gay marriage has just recently become legal in most States, and there is no possible way to get any numbers on how many of these marriages will last a lifetime.
I'm not talking about Gay marriage, I'm talking about life long committed relationships. How many have you seen? Do you know of any Gay relationships that have lasted for a lifetime? I'm sure there are a few, but I have not seen any.
Do you remember the Aids crisis? Do you remember all the Gay swapping parties that were a big contributor to the spread of Aids? I don't think there were many committed monogamous relationships going on with those people. Homosexuality seems to revolve around sex, more so then committed relationships.
Oh, I forgot.... IGNORE .
  Considerate: 31%  
  Substantial: 76%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.12  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Gay marriage    possible way   Gay relationships   Gay swapping parties  
  Relevant (Beta): 92%  
  Learn More About Debra
That is why the stats mention the yearly rate. Besides, you were the first one talking about instability of those marriages, yet once the stats turned out to not confirm your narrative, suddenly "there is no possible way to get any numbers"? When you start a game, you get to play it.
Ignore me all you want; you are factually wrong whether you do it or not.
  Considerate: 80%  
  Substantial: 84%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
Also how like to know how many straight people end up with a stable permanent relationship compared to gays.
* I dont know the numbers just being devils advocate.
  Considerate: 77%  
  Substantial: 72%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.72  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
All we have to do is look around us. For any Gay people that you ight know of, how many have you seen with a life long committed relationship. Do you see couples who met in their early twenties, let's say, and are still together at retirement?
  Considerate: 67%  
  Substantial: 67%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: Gay people    committed relationship   couples   life  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
Anyways though anecdotal evidence like that isnt necessarily reliable either.
  Considerate: 91%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 81%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.16  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: track of other peoples relationships    anecdotal evidence   close friends.Anyways   Im  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
One thing you and I both know is that statistics on so many failed Gay relationships will never be published or talked about, because it hurts the Pro LGBT narrative of Homosexuality being a wonderful natural normal sexual orientation.
Are you old enough to remember how desperatly Democrats tried to shift blame for the spread of Aids from the Gay community? Remember how we heard non stop talk about Aids beig spread through blood transfusions of tainted blood in hospitals, through dirty drug needles of addicts, etc. etc.
They went out of their way to down play the harm of all the Gay swapping parties, promiscuous lifestyles, etc, with the spread of Aids.
When they did speak to sex being a cause of spreading Aids, they seldom differentiated how Gay sex spread the majority of Aids cases, versus heterosexual sex.
We also seldom hear from the Left on the undesired results of Transgender surgeries and it's lifetime need for dangerous drugs.
We seldom hear of all the depression and guilt from women after abortions.
We seldom here about the harm from marijuana. Remember the Democrat Party's war on cigarettes? Their silence on the harmful effects of marijuana is deafening.
We hardly ever hear how the Democrat Party supports ALL abortions for any reason at any stage. They love to talk about extreme cases only. They do not talk about how they believe children are mature enough to make decisions on getting abortions without Parents being notified
When the facts do not fit into the Left's narrative, the story seldom appears.
  Considerate: 55%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.7  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: spread of Aids    stop talk   Gay relationships   blood transfusions  
  Relevant (Beta): 82%  
  Learn More About Debra
Yes, We_are_Accountable name the subject properly as a freedom of the press has a prejudice as it's legal precedent and can be abolished by the simple addition of a charge or cost. There is no connection to a fundamental idea that it would be just like quoting the wrong number for scripture religious service of a church as a state of legal principles.
Okay for We_Are_Accountable a homosexual couple is never married until they are in a position to be held as a united state legally by the state's of law. At least one of us had the foresight to address the problem with a legal objection, taking the united state into my constitutional objection. An a new word describing a witness account was formed as an independent state without prejudice, BiniVir. Without prejudice is meant clearly to mean without having a criminal unprosecuted by fear of civil trial creating all criminal equal as a criminal's in the form of united state perjury. This as the crime of perjury can be complex and hard to gain a criminal conviction.
All homosexuals are created equal as men for all men are to be created equal by their creator. Therefore the focus is to be placed here at a legal form of the union set for a law allowing a United State Constitutional structure to remain in tack to preserve the liberty of the Court's right to preserve the American United States constitution, as its constitutional common defense to the general welfare. The creator here is a state of a union of single partnerships in interactions of the legal governing state of law. As the single unit required to form a more perfect state of the union.
Giving forth on this day February 23, 2020, a more perfect state of a union Binivir creating all men equal by their creator. As we are here in United in a debate, I ask officially how you plead. Yeah? in favor of Binivir. Nay? opposed to Binivir.
Let it be known, a female vote is taken but is under prejudice as all women have not yet created themselves as a united state without prejudice constitutionally equal under governing of law. This possible crime, not theirs to bear alone to bear with prejudice.
My fingers hurt when I am forced to write all constitutionally....
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 81%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.54  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 74%  
  Learn More About Debra
Should I be writing a rap to explain this?
It is unclear if people don't just need profanity and twerking to maintain any attention span.
  Considerate: 81%  
  Substantial: 40%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: attention span    rap   people   profanity  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 74%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 5.86  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
I DO remember the AIDs crisis, The first carrier in the U.S. HAPPENED to be a gay guy. When he found he was infected he went kind of bonkers and started "spreading it" throughout N.Y.C. He would say, after a relationship, "I have "gay cancer", and now you have too!" A shame. if he had been simply a sexually active white college guy, it may not have been blamed on the gay community. Such is life. YOUR "ludicrous stats" may have been unavailable today.
The divorce rate is VERY high among your white, religious folk also, and in many cases an unhappy couple is forced to REMAIN unhappy due to religious doctrine. I'd rather we had more happy people that could admit "the shoe doesn't fit", so, …… IGNORE.
  Considerate: 39%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 7.92  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 77%  
  Learn More About Debra
That is very convenient, to claim that the data supports your narrative, but this data will never be published, because it is politically inconvenient. You can make any claim this way: "Drug addicts on average are wealthier than people who do not consume drugs, the drug critics just do not allow any data to be published!"
The question then is, if the data is not published, how in the world can you know what narrative it supports? You do not; it is, once again, a purely emotional position based on your skewed perceptions, rather than on some sort of a logical analysis.
I personally do not know; it is quite possible that gay relationships fail more often than heterosexual relationships. I linked the article that suggests otherwise, but it is just one article based on analysis of one limited dataset which may or may not be restrictive.
The difference between you and me is that when I do not know something, I refrain from making claims on it, whether I want them to be true or not, while in your case you claim whatever you hope is the case. If it turns out that gay relationships are just as stable or more stable than heterosexual ones, then your whole narrative will fall apart, hence you desperately cling to the possibility that this is not the case.
  Considerate: 74%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.88  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 69%  
  Learn More About Debra
A person’s Constitutional right can be assigned Miranda as a united state conducive to law. It can argue that any couple as a homosexual man and heterosexual woman are in fact still married had the exchanged taken place with a traditional wedding vow.
All that is established is an inability to define a preservation of the United State with the Constitution by Court or Religion that hosts the Union. What was to have taken place had there been no prejudice would have simply been a civil union as a second event, the right to marriage is simply no longer viable at any time the courts may release its state of legal bond stopped half of the union but would lose credibility as a witness to religion by this prejudice. The marriage in place would stand to ensure that the couples must remain in a united state of love honor and obey. The Title of marriage stands as having been used by the one choice of whom take the vowed of Marriage with. It is a legal connection. The court does not show any legal reason why a couple must be held in the same residence to serve the likely-hood of Marriage honor and obey. When either couple states leave, the honor of the union of marriage with the word obeying means to leave not superseded the vows of the union and stay. A vow is taken of till death do you part it is not mistakable for murder to abandon the state of the marriage vows.
  Considerate: 88%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.06  
  Sources: 1  
  Relevant (Beta): 80%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 69%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.4  
  Sources: 1  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: LGBTQ defilement    breech of nature   obscenity   immorality  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Well sadly RickyD that is not the issue, it is an issue just not this one. Can you give a reason why two men who set up a household together can not be united as Binivir when you are witnessing them as sharing the same residence? In the most basic way, a large group created by only the need for these two men to be seen legally together.
Keep in mind you are not being asking what they are doing while living together, in a house only that they are in fact living in the same household. Are we not creating all men as equals by providing a title to describing this witness account? Is this something a woman can do, create all men as equal in this way?
  Considerate: 87%  
  Substantial: 91%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.76  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: basic way    large group   witness account   men  
  Relevant (Beta): 85%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 70%  
  Substantial: 80%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.64  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
Thank you for your civil response. I agree with much of what you say. Where I do not agree is your assumption that I have a bias against LGBT groups.
I have no bias, but i do have a brain and can see the bias from the Left pushing these LGBT agendas into our schools, our entertainment programming, our Sports, and our State's rights to disagree.
There is no data on how many Gay relationshps (most revolving around non marital unions) actually last. All we can do is "look around" and see for ourselves how many lifelong committed Gay relationshipsliving there are.
I know of none, but I'm sure there are a few. If Homosexuality is a natural normal sexual orientation, we should see at least as many life long relationships as we do with Heterosexuals. As I mentioned in my debate, two men coming together as one union is not how we are designed. Men and women have totally separate personality traits, and those differences fit well together.
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 92%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.1  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 86%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.6  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 52%  
  Learn More About Debra
FOR THE MILLIONTH TIME, I DO NOT TALK ABOUT HOMOSEXUALITY BEING BAD, I TALK ABOUT LGBT ACTIVISTS PUSHING THEIR AGENDAS INTO OUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND CONDITIONING OUR CHILDREN!
Until you address the truth of what I speak out about, we are through!
  Considerate: 53%  
  Substantial: 63%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: MILLIONTH TIME    PUBLIC SCHOOLS   HOMOSEXUALITY BEING   LGBT ACTIVISTS  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
If homosexuality is not bad, then what is wrong with telling people that homosexuality is not bad? What conditioning exactly do you imply; is someone converting straight kids into homosexuals or something?
You keep talking about some mythical "LGBT agenda", but never explain what exactly it entails.
Now, I do know some aspects of the LGBT movement I wish were not present, and, for that matter, the whole idea of an "LGBT movement" has something off about it; I think people should talk about acceptance of everyone, rather than one specific group.
But something tells me that what I dislike about this movement is quite different from what you dislike about it, hence I would like to see some explanation.
You have mentioned the problem with "LGBT commercials" or something, but never explained how they are fundamentally different from "straight commercials", as an example. It is not clear what exactly you are unhappy with and why.
  Considerate: 69%  
  Substantial: 92%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 12.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 97%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 47%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 91%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 8.78  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
Your every post proves my generalizing of you. You fit the exact person I describe... TO A TEE!
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 38%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 6.24  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: exact person    post   TEE   generalizing  
  Relevant (Beta): 88%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 88%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.48  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 91%  
  Learn More About Debra
If I have to explain to you, in detail, what has OBVIOUSLY been going on for years with this non stop LGBT cheer leading by the Democrat Party, then I have over estimated your knowledge of politics. A person would have had to live in a cave for the last 20 years not to see the activism of these LGBT groups.
I repeatedly give you example of what is happening in our public schools, on our family programming TV commercials, etc.
We can't sit down with our children to watch entertainment shows such as The Vocie, American Idol, Awards shows, etc., where they don't go out of their way to cheer lead a singer being Trangender or Homosexual.
It's funny how they never mention a singer being Heterosexual before he sings. No one needs to know what a person's sexual orientation is! It's a singing competition! Millions of parents do not want their children being conditioned to believe that these sexual orientations are normal.
You know exactly what my concerns are, and simply play ignorant while trying to paint me as hating Gays. STOP THE DECEPTION!
If you are ignorant to all this propaganda and conditioning of our children, then please ignore me, I want to debate people who are hoenst and who watch the news.
I said you are the type of person that fits my generalization to a tee, because you never speak out against all the issues. If you agree with some of my positions, why are you silent on these issues? Where are your debates speaking to these issues?
You are silent on the Left's support of No Restriction abortions, Infanticide, Democrats ending the Hyde Amendment, Democrats trying to force ALL public schools to allow boys, who think they are girls, into our daughter's sports, Transgenders talking to our kindergartners, etc. etc.
Your silence says it all! You have no problem commenting on my concerns with all this LGBT activism. If you agree with some of it, try speaking out once in your life, and may be stemming this extreme Big Brother indoctrination of our children. When I see you actually speaking out, I might actually believe you. Create some debates if you care about these issues.
  Considerate: 46%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Positive  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.9  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: person's sexual orientation    public schools   stop LGBT cheer   Democrat Party  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 78%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 96%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.38  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 35%  
  Learn More About Debra
Singers sing songs about being attracted to the opposite sex all the time. Homosexuals actually very rarely, if ever, sing such songs; it is enough for them to just say, "Guys, I am gay", and move on.
People put out their heterosexuality much-much-much more than their homosexuality. People are just used to it, so they do not pay any attention to it. While putting out one's homosexuality is relatively novel, hence some people feel like it is being overdone.
It is true that there is a lot of identity politics stuff, such as people complaining when there are no homosexuals among the Grammy award winners... But I fail to see how that conditions children in any way. Are your children going to become homosexuals just to spite the Grammy folks? Please.
Lastly, who gives a flying potato about what is "normal" and what is not? It is normal in the world to live in Third World conditions; I do not see people in the First World lining up to do so though. If you want your children to be normal, then you have already failed them in, at least, one way.
  Considerate: 51%  
  Substantial: 79%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.32  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 94%  
  Learn More About Debra
You keep distorting the facts of what we are talking about. This is because there is no refuting the truth of my words. You must distort and deceive in every response.
You just said that people on my side do not accept Homosexuals. COMPLETE DISTORTION AS ALWAYS!
I know why the Left has politicized these LGBT agendas! It's called politics, big money and votes! If you do not know this then WOW!
Yes, this all started for reasons of non discrimination when it came to jobs, hospital visitation rights, etc.
We on the Right accepted these common sense rights. That is old news! Stop talking about old news, and address the activism of what these groups are forcing on everyone. This is where the non stop arguing stems from.
You again distorted my stance on this issue. What a shock! You said I cry at the mear sight of a Homosexual couple in media. COMPLETE DISTORTION ONCE AGAIN!
I speak out against the CHEER LEADING of Homosexuality as being another normal sexual orientation... ON FAMILY PROGRAMMING, IN OUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
They do not simply show to Gay men together which I have no problem with. They spend the next couple minutes lifting up their Gay lifestyles as a wonderful normal thing to be embraced. GUESS WHAT? There are millons of parents watching this show with their impressionable children, who DO NOT AGREE with this political correct indoctrination. How about having some respect for parents when it comes to these very controversial issues.
You again distort my position when talking about freedom of the press. We have this thing called a RATING SYSTEM in our media, and they warn parents that certain shows are meant for an adult audience. This does not prevent free speech. It's a common sense system to protect our children from adult subject matter.
I have no problem with Gays in movies or documentaries, etc. etc. when it is known what the show entails.
I am talking about family programming where kids are watching. I realize you could not care less if our children are being indoctrinated to embrace Homosexuality or Transgenderism as being normal.
It's truly arrogant to so disrepect parent's right's to protect their children from adult subject matter.
So in a couple decades, do you want to live in a culture where people stop worrying about our children being exposed to sexual orientations where people are attracted to corpses, to animals, to consenting children, etc.?
Under your logic, parents such as myself who want to protect our children from all this LGBT normalization, should just and let it happen. Are you ok with your kids being taught that Beastiality, Necrophilia, etc. are also normal sexual orientations, OR DO YOU DRAW THE LINE SOMEWHERE?
Why do you get to draw the line with the current LGBT alphabet, but would deny future groups from jumping on the band wagon? Can you get the point? Can you grasp the slippery slope where society must protect our children from whatever activist group comes out next.
I don't have an outraged mindset! I have simple wisdom to see the slippery slpe in action, while people like you bury your head and say NOTHING! You allow activist groups to shape our children's future and you say NOTHING!!!
It's not outrage to take a stand! People like me took a stand when Slavery was the law of the land! No different then speaking out for unborn lives. This is not outrage. It is humanity!
  Considerate: 47%  
  Substantial: 86%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 94%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.04  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: impressionable children    COMPLETE DISTORTION   millons of parents   Gay men  
  Relevant (Beta): 89%  
  Learn More About Debra
You definitely have an outraged mindset. You hardly post about anything in a positive light and always start your debates by being angry at somebody or some group of people. You come off as extremely angry to me.
  Considerate: 56%  
  Substantial: 85%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 90%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.06  
  Sources: 3  
  Relevant (Beta): 37%  
  Learn More About Debra
I wonder if anti Slavery people came across as angry? I would hope any person with humanity would be outraged at slavery, at viable babies being killed for mere convenience, for children being born alive from an unsuccessful abortion, and then allowed to die on a table with absolutely no help from doctors, to our impressionable children being indoctrinated to ignore the Science of Biology, and believe that unions between two men is natural and normal.
This is like the twilight zone of depravity and for people like you to judge those who speak out, as being angry people? That is the most arrogent condescending denial of a person's right to be angry!
Everyone should be angry when political activist groups prey our children's minds! The only reason you are not angry over these Liberal issues is because you actually support them!!!!!
It's truly says everything about non Christians when they are BLIND to this depravity all around us, and totally silent!
You and every other non Christian who says nothing while our children are targeted, are the biggest proof of God's existence. Only insecure people who are rebelling against God, could support our children being indoctrinated by these activist groups.
Yes, I am angry watching our culture fall into the gutter. For you to try and say that all of this propaganda and LGBT cheer leading does not affect how our children will grow up and to what they will believe, is absolutely ludicrous!
Are you blind to the change in American culture? I can not debate dishonesty! To try to say that all this LGBT hysteria is not affecting our children's view on sexuality and the natural design of our Bodies, is ludicrous.
OF COURSE THIS AFFECTS OUR CHILDREN AND WHAT THEY GROW UP TO BELIEVE! GET REAL!
Why was the Left so outraged over the freedom of a community public school to vote to allow a morning prayer with no child forced to pray along?
According to you, children will grow up to be who they are no matter how they are raised, or what prayers they might hear in schools, etc. etc.
How can you be so hypocritical to fear children hearing a simple prayer in schools, but having no problem when LGBT groups are coming into the school to INDOCTRINATE THEM?
Yes, I get angry every time I debate a hypocrite who wants it ALL THEIR WAY! It's always ok to censor religious expression, but not LGBT expression!
Please don't tell me how you are not against allowing religious expression on public land, because you never speak out against THAT censorship!
  Considerate: 45%  
  Substantial: 87%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 97%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.2  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: public school    morning prayer   impressionable children   religious expression  
  Relevant (Beta): 93%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 57%  
  Substantial: 77%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 99%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.9  
  Sources: 4  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: religious expression    child   own brain cells   LGBT expression  
  Relevant (Beta): 28%  
  Learn More About Debra
I will waste no more time with a very very deceptive person if you continue to distort my position!
It says everything about a person's position when they refuse to debate the facts and constantly distort the positions of others.
Again you said I want to black out everything I don't like... !
I said I want to keep LGBT content and indoctrination off FAMILY PROGRAMMING WHERE KIDS ARE WATCHING!
CAN YOU READ? OR MUST YOU ALWAYS DISTORT THE DEBATE TO TRY AND DEMONIZE YOUR OPPONENT?
Where did I EVER say people can not believe whatever they want to believe? !
You did what you always do and DISTORTED what i said about school prayer. Who does not know that schools have diverse classes where children can voluntarily join. That's called a CHOICE with the parents understanding the class and agreeing to it.
I'm talking about Transgenders coming into the classrooms, talking to every child. I'm not talking about special classes where kids join up.
What a shock that you did not mention school prayer? I must have missed where you said you support a public school's choice to have a prayer at beginning of day, with no chIld forced to pray. According to you, this will have no affect on what a child grows up to believe, correct. Are you for the freedom of choice for a school prayer in public schools?
If so, why have I never heard you speaking out against that censorship? It's amazing how fast people like you will demonize any Christian or Conservative who dares to question LGBT indoctrination of our children, yet you never defend a school's right to have a prayer.
Why is your so called anti censorship always one way? I don't want to censor anything unless it is controversial adult subject manner being put forth on our children. If you support censoring a school's choice to have a prayer, you better also support censoring every other controversial issue from schools.
  Considerate: 57%  
  Substantial: 82%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.06  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: school prayer    deceptive person   public school's choice   person's position  
  Relevant (Beta): 55%  
  Learn More About Debra
Slavery was defeated exactly because people, instead of flipping out, made rational arguments against it and defeated the opposition in an open debate. Those who yelled in anger, on the other hand, have been left out of the pages of history books, and even other anti-slavery people tried to stay as far away from them as possible.
You are also picking the most irrelevant things ever, making the claim that the culture is falling apart based on them. Really, LGBT commercials and abortion clinics is what upsets you? ... How are you still alive? On this planet, there are wars, there are millions people starving, there are totalitarian states, there are genocides, there is torture. Yet two girls kissing on TV is what prevents you from sleeping at night?
I sense that it is not a real concern, but, rather, a product of your media bubble. There is no way anyone would start worrying about these things on their own; there has to be some serious outside influence here. Virtually all of your positions are exactly the same as those of the current bunch of Fox News anchors. It cannot be a coincidence.
  Considerate: 63%  
  Substantial: 88%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 98%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.26  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: pages of history books    accountable Slavery   anti-slavery people   totalitarian states  
  Relevant (Beta): 96%  
  Learn More About Debra
LOL, spoken from the side that could not sleep at night from the thought of a public school prayer!!!!!
Your hypocrisy is truly pathetic.
You call killing viable babies for mere convenience as being irrelevant? How dead inside are you?
Would you have no problem with some dysfunctional person talking to your kids in school about Nechrofilia, or Beastiality? According to those groups, they are also born that way and want to be recognised with every other LGBT group in our public schools.They would also like to be included in the discussions with "safe places", and also be included in our history books.
It's truly sick how far the Left has fallen into bed with anti Science sexual disorders, and now conditioning our children to embrace.
For you to be so blind to the dangers of what is happening, means you lack the most basic of discernment to the dangers of all this LGBT madness.
You would be fine living in a world where the children's fathers are a name on a sperm bank's donor list. It is hard knowing we have so many people such as yourself, who fear the very mention moral values.
  Considerate: 38%  
  Substantial: 93%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level: 9.98  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 99%  
  Learn More About Debra
I could not care less about public school prayer. You should stop prescribing people positions they do not hold.
People are free to talk to my potential kids about anything; I do not believe in sheltered parenting and think my kids should get to interact with the real world, including its most controversial sides.
I am not "blind" to the dangers; I am perfectly aware of them as a result of cold, emotionless analysis, which is why I know that they are inconsequential. You would not even think about them, if you did not watch sensationalist media all the time, is my guess.
Once again, your positions mirror those promoted by Fox News one-in-one. It is clear that you are not thinking for yourself, and this is further supported by how weak and shallow your arguments are. You do not have a well thought-out position on things you talk about; your positions are not yours.
  Considerate: 78%  
  Substantial: 95%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 95%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 10.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Relevant (Beta): 98%  
  Learn More About Debra
LGBT attractions are not unnatural, because they happen in nature.
You say that homosexual relationships are broken. Well, if a homosexual man had a relationship with a heterosexual woman or vice versa, the relationship would be even more likely to break up.
  Considerate: 83%  
  Substantial: 55%  
  Spelling & Grammar: 93%  
  Sentiment: Neutral  
  Avg. Grade Level: 11.96  
  Sources: 0  
  Entity Sentiment Detection: accountable LGBT attractions    homosexual relationships   homosexual man   vice  
  Relevant (Beta): 63%  
  Learn More About Debra