It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
The heliocentric model is accurate and correct. With a flat earth, the earth may not be able to revolve and rotate. Also, with a flat earth ships, airplanes, etc. would fall off if they would reach the West, East, North, and South.
I believe that the Earth is heliocentric. An Antarctic wall of ice may not span all sides of the Earth. Also, planes and boats wouldn’t be able to go back to their previous location if the Earth was flat.
The earth must be round due to the edges on a flat Earth. Objects and people would fall off the Earth if there was curvature. Also, weather would not be abelt to go around the Earth if it was flat as well as some objects like planes and boats.
@SilverishGoldNova To directly address the images you posted, if you claim that they're from NASA then you need to provide links to the original photos as published by them. What you've posted looks like a meme and looks entirely uncredible. The only difference in the images of the Earth over the course of 43 years is in the formation and structure of the clouds. Obviously each photo is taken from a different perspective. Do you expect not clouds to change shape over 43 years?
@SilverishGoldNova can you provide me with some sources to show that NASA openly admit to their photos being fake? If you're talking about NASA 'admitting' that their photos are edited using photoshop, that does not mean that they are fake. Most of the photos you see of the Earth consist of several little photos made into one. Apply this principle to other images. If I take a panoramic photo of the beach on my smart phone, that is an image that is made up by several other images. Does that mean that image is fake? Does it not accurately depict the scene I was trying to capture? They are uncredible sources because they've not been verified by any real science or proven to be true through evidence. None of the world's public intellectuals and/or science communicators believe the Earth is flat - they actively promote the factual evidence to show that it is not.How would the government benefit from lying to us about the shape of the Earth?In your argument of 'the disc shaped Earth', what would happen if you constantly travelled North? We know that because the Earth is round you would end up at the exact place you started. This would be impossible if the Earth was a disc shape?
Also IM the one gish galloping?
If you're going to
claim that the photos of the earth are original from NASA, you need to provide
links to the publications made by them of the same photos. The chance that they
have been manipulated to fool people like you is very, very high.
are the oceans and the land?" The colour of the oceans and the land
differentiates in each photo because of the technology that was available at
"Why is there
never any real video of the Earth spinning?
"Why are the
images so varied?" Because each photo is taken on a different camera
showing the earth at a different point in time, from a different perspective.
I didn't ignore the
point of copy & pasted clouds, I asked you to provide links to the original
photos as published by NASA to prove that the photo you posted has not been
tampered with or altered.
I am not claiming
that scientists and cosmologists are immune to making mistakes. But are you
telling me that for centuries every astronomer, astrophysicist, cosmologist,
scientists and every other kind of public intellectual have been consciously
lying and/or making critical mistakes in their research for several centuries?
Can you also explain the above diagram?
@SilverishGoldNova Could you explain why you deleted my post that had points you couldn't refute? I'm not asking about planes and boast going around the disc shaped earth, I'm asking if they went in one straight line continuously. They would eventually have to reach the edge.
@SilverishGoldNova have you ever been on a plane in your life? You can so clearly see the curvature of the Earth.
@Erfisflat so you're claiming that there is some kind of magical force that takes control of your aircraft and spins you around mid-flight? Seems very logical.