Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
DebateIsland.com is the largest online debate website globally where anyone can anonymously and easily debate online, casually or formally, while connecting with their friends and others. Users, regardless of debating skill level, can civilly debate just about anything online in a text-based online debate website that supports five easy-to-use and fun debating formats ranging from Casual, to Formalish, to Lincoln-Douglas Formal. In addition, people can improve their debating skills with the help of revolutionary artificial intelligence-powered technology on our debate website. DebateIsland is totally free and provides the best online debate experience of any debate website.
Debra AI Prediction
Post Argument Now Debate Details +
Arguments
Do you get how the facts about climate change caused the shift from the calling it agw to acc? Your coconspirator phite supplied this link: https://e360.yale.edu/features/air-pollutions-upside-a-brake-on-global-warming in a futile effort to disprove agw. But it supported anthropogenic climate change. His and your continued use of the out dated agw is evident of self deception and delusion.
The alarmist and the scammers are losing, being outed as I told you from day one. The scientist are winning the debate. (that too I told you). Thankfully about 98% of them agree anthropogenic climate change is real and are studying it.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Okay, who was the person or organization which conducted this mythical poll? How was it conducted? How many "scientists" were polled? Every scientist in the world, or just a representative example? If a representative example, how big was the representative example? How many scientists are there in the world? Was it a secret ballot ? Or, was it possible, even probable, that any negative statement made about climate change could be made public and therefore a danger to a scientists continued career as a scientist?
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Well first of all you need to accept the fact that there is no such thing as a well throught out play from Bogans Playbook. That is because it has been proven that @Bogan has only half a brain and that nullifies the well thought out theory straight a way. Hes been asked that question before any way and he was unable to answer because guess what? He would have to use the other half of of his brain which he doesnt use. And even if he did he would be smaked in the head with a brick that every thing he comes up with is total 100% made up crapola or comes from scam web sites. And be sides it would take ages for him to chew through all the corks dangling from his Acruba before he would even get a round to even think about addressing such a question.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Earth's temperature fluctuates naturally over tens of thousands to millions of years. Today, we are experiencing very rapid change in temperature, which is caused by humans (the greenhouse effect). Not only that, but there are many other problems that humans have created:
Deforestation, habitat deconstruction, overfishing, resource depletion from overconsumption, urbanization, waste generation, marine ecosystem depletion, overfishing, water pollution, industrialization, soil degradation, and much more. I don’t think you will agree with me, but I just wanted to point that out. Edit: I am new to this so I accidentally posted twice so my bad.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Earth's temperature fluctuates naturally over tens of thousands to millions of years. Today, we are experiencing very rapid change in temperature, which is caused by humans (the greenhouse effect). Not only that, but there are many other problems that humans have created:
Deforestation, habitat deconstruction, overfishing, resource depletion from overconsumption, urbanization, waste generation, marine ecosystem depletion, overfishing, water pollution, industrialization, soil degradation, and much more. I don’t think you will agree with me, but I just wanted to point that out.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Today, we are experiencing very rapid change in temperature, which is caused by humans (the greenhouse effect). Not only that, but there are many other problems that humans have created:
Prove it.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
(By, David Herring and Rebecca Lindsey)
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
When you expect poor people to pay $20,000 more for a EV car than they do now, that's someone who doesn't care about poor people, and care more about virtue signaling than actually solving the problem.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
Seriously though you're right, virtue signaling isn't helping to solve the problem.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
So true. Why can't we just approach a problem for what it is? It doesn't have to be an 'all in' mentality of us vs them.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra
True but then again we're dealing with people who think Large metropolitan cities are "insignificant" pockets of air pollution, causing copd and all.
  Considerate: 100%  
  Substantial: 100%  
  Sentiment: Negative  
  Avg. Grade Level:   
  Sources:   
  Relevant (Beta): 100%  
  Learn More About Debra